He takes a swipe at Bush just to make his article appear legit to liberals
I guess its all to easy to take swipes at that halfwitOriginally Posted by roidattack
The article is spot on though![]()
Halfwit is an egregious understatment.
BTW he makes it easy to take swipes at him.
Originally Posted by johan
See what I mean..he automatically endeared himself to you with that crap..
I love how liberals always paint conservative presidents as stupid and democrats as somehow brilliant. "Well if he doesnt agree with me he must be stupid" Just propaganda.
The writer did make some good points though.
They said Ronald Reagan was stupid..you remember, the guy that ended the cold war?
To be honest I didnt even reflect over the bush comment before you posted your reply. I even had to go back and reread it. Its not like his two short comments about bush held any kind of importance to the article.Originally Posted by roidattack
The author of that paper sounds more conservative than liberal to me.Originally Posted by roidattack
I mean all liberals have there buts firmly placed on the "technology stupid and evil, green earth good" bandwagon. This guy seems alot more realistic, have never heard of him before today though.
I think the cold war would have ended either way, I would like to se some real analysis about how much effect Reagans policies realy had on the collaps of the soviet empire.Originally Posted by roidattack
I doubt it was as easy to make a fool out of reagan as it is to make a fool out of bush though, you got to admit he sure isnt a good public speaker![]()
Originally Posted by johan
Possibly you didnt reflect on the comment but it didnt hurt his credibility with libs..and Im sure helped..
You think the cold war would have ended either wayok
Is it possible for you to give any conservative leaders in the US history their due?
He took the armed forces and built and built and built. He was going to have the greatest military on the planet and bankrupt the Soviets by trying to keep pace.
The missle defense system was started by him and at the time their scientists didnt think we could do it but the leadership was afraid we could. Reagans advisors told him to back off from throwing that in their face but he went in and dictated terms. Thats what ended the cold war..it wasnt going to end on its own.
They honestly did say some of the same things about Bush as they did Reagan. With Reagan they said it was just slick marketing, that he wasnt that bright.
I do admit Bush is not the best public speaker we ever had but that doesnt make him stupid.
Sure I give good leaders there due, rosevelt was a good man, to bad he listened to much to churchil(also a good man, but far to shortsighted). American leaders around the ww2 times was great. The marshall plan was one of the best things that ever has happened to this world to ensure peaceOriginally Posted by roidattack
Well the soviet economy was going to hell with or without trying to compete with star wars. Thats all I know. I have never read up on it more. Im sure reagan probably accelerated it. But was his policies solely responsible for the fall of the soviet union? I doubt it. The whole political system in soviet was doomed to fail.Originally Posted by roidattack
You give far to little credit to Mikhail Gorbachev. Id say Gorbachev's reforms was more important than reagans spendings no doubt. Perestroika and glasnost.
I think bush is stupid because of the descisions he has made firstly and his public speaking secondOriginally Posted by roidattack
I love his public speaking, its pure comedy. I just can not get how he could get elected when he cant even talk publicly. He must have been embarassed in all debates or maby kerry was even more stupid.
A swedish politician would never get away with beeing such a poor speaker.
But over here debates betwen party leaders are the most important deciding factor of the election and we have plenty of them on national television.
Its comical that the leader of the biggest western nation with the best higher education has only a weak grasp of his own language.
Reagan is given way too much credit for ending the cold war. He didn't, Russia had massive internal economic issues and had to drastically cut back on defense spending. Ironic now because the US spends more on military/defense than the rest of the world combined. You take a portion of what the US spends on mililtary/financing conflicts and spend it on fighting abject poverty in countries and regions of the south (developing nations)Originally Posted by roidattack
and see what benefits that type of foreign policy/diplomacy benefits/dividends that will play in fighting growing unrest and fundamentalism in regions of conflict and hostility. Breshnev deserves more recognition for ending the cold war than Reagan as he wanted to open up Russia to the outside world.
Originally Posted by ecivon
Bullshit. Their defense spending broke their economy and they couldnt keep up with the US.
Originally Posted by johan
Johan your a die hard liberal...
Nah dont put me in the same group as those asshole american democrats and michael moore cooksuckersOriginally Posted by roidattack
![]()
Im a social liberal. freedom with responsibilityBoth for ourself and everyone else.
Im not calling you a wacko, you just dont espouse anything conservative. I mean anything.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)