Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Politically correct?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Bandit County
    Posts
    0

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740
    This could get nasty...........
    For what it is worth, my best friend's sister flies F15's over Iraq. In fact her squad leader was the one shot down a couple of weeks ago. She is a smart girl, but even she admits that she got in because the AirForce needed to fill quotas..........

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Aslong as the demands on chicks and males are the same I dont care. The moment we start to lower expectations to get chicks into things like firedepartments, military ect I get pissed off.

    I dont se why women wouldnt be just as good as men at flying jets. Its not like men have some kind of physical superiority in that setting

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Bandit County
    Posts
    0
    Johan it is already done

    in the canadian military they reduced the standards to get more women, then they reduced the standard to get more "ethnicities", physically and mentally.

    I luv the pussification of the western world
    neither, I am sure they are super qualified, I havent seen a dumb astronaut yet, except that first canadian chick who thinks she's all that...
    anyway

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Getting madcow treatments
    Posts
    16,450
    Quote Originally Posted by 3Vandoo
    Johan it is already done

    in the canadian military they reduced the standards to get more women, then they reduced the standard to get more "ethnicities", physically and mentally.

    I luv the pussification of the western world
    neither, I am sure they are super qualified, I havent seen a dumb astronaut yet, except that first canadian chick who thinks she's all that...
    anyway

    The us military has different standards too. That pisses me off. If your making a soldier, make a soldier

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by 3Vandoo
    Johan it is already done

    in the canadian military they reduced the standards to get more women, then they reduced the standard to get more "ethnicities", physically and mentally.

    I luv the pussification of the western world
    neither, I am sure they are super qualified, I havent seen a dumb astronaut yet, except that first canadian chick who thinks she's all that...
    anyway
    Well thats stupid. I would not be suprised if its the same in sweden aswell I have never bothered to check.

    I dont think the enemy will treat a chick nicer or a fire beeing more kind on a female firefighter. Damn feminists and there bullshit

    Equality should be equality, not perks for females and minorites.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740
    Quote Originally Posted by johan
    Aslong as the demands on chicks and males are the same I dont care. The moment we start to lower expectations to get chicks into things like firedepartments, military ect I get pissed off.

    I dont se why women wouldnt be just as good as men at flying jets. Its not like men have some kind of physical superiority in that setting
    I think that woman are more technical than men, which would make them good pilots. I kayak whitewater alot, and the kayakers with the best technique are almost always women.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740
    Quote Originally Posted by johan
    Well thats stupid. I would not be suprised if its the same in sweden aswell I have never bothered to check.

    I dont think the enemy will treat a chick nicer or a fire beeing more kind on a female firefighter. Damn feminists and there bullshit

    Equality should be equality, not perks for females and minorites.
    The US Supreme Court is hearing two cases that have to do with reverse discrimination right now. The plaintiffs case is based on the "Equal Protection under the law" clause. They claim that white males are not being given equal protection....I obviously agree.........

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •