Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Logan13's Avatar
    Logan13 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740

    Clinton Admin. spied on Princess Diana without permission from Brits...

    Clinton Admin. spied on Princess Diana without permission from Brits...
    Daily Mail.Uk
    12/10/06
    American intelligence agencies were bugging Princess Diana's telephone over her relationship with a US billionaire, the Mail's sister paper has learned.

    Evening Standard reports that she was even forced to abandon a planned holiday with her sons in the US with tycoon Teddy Forstmann on advice from secret services, who passed on their concerns to their British counterparts.

    Both US and British intelligence then forced Diana to change her plans to stay with Mr Forstmann in the summer of 1997, saying it was too "dangerous" to take her sons there.

    Instead the princess took the fateful decision to take a summer break with Harrods owner Mohamed Fayed. This ultimately led to her going to Paris with his son Dodi, where they died in a car crash.

    The revelation from independent inquiries by the Evening Standard comes as it emerged that Princess Diana's phone was bugged by US intelligence agencies on the night she died without the permission of the British secret intelligence services.

    Authoritative leaks say the extraordinary revelations will be published this week by Lord Stevens and is bound to raise fresh questions about conspiracy theories.

    The US secret service was monitoring Diana's friendship with the controversial financier Mr Forstmann for some weeks.

    Mohamed Fayed has always insisted the princess and Dodi Fayed were murdered in a plot involving MI6 agents and US intelligence.

    The Standard has learned that Diana had agreed to a week's holiday with princes William and Harry in the US.

    She had accepted an invitation from her one-time American boyfriend Mr Forstmann to stay with him at his house in the Hamptons.

    But as she was travelling with the princes, she needed the trip to be cleared by the British security services. They surprisingly vetoed Diana's plans because of concerns about the security surrounding the billionaire's homes or perhaps a possible threat from elsewhere.

    The decision by the security services ultimately led to Diana striking up her friendship with Dodi and returning to the south of France to holiday with him.

    This led to her being in Paris on 31 August, the day of the crash.

    The Evening Standard also understands that US secret services have a number of secret files on Diana and her closest associates that are held by the national security agency. The files, which include reports from foreign intelligence - thought to include MI5 and MI6 - come under both top secret and secret categories.The reports cannot be released because of "exceptionally grave damage to the national security". The documents on the princess seem to have arisen because of the company she kept rather than through any attempt to target her.

    Diana enjoyed an intimate friendship with Mr Forstmann after her relationship with Prince Charles had broken down.

    Lord Stevens is expected to conclude on Thursday that Diana, Dodi Fayed, and their driver Henri Paul died in an accident caused by him driving too fast through the Pont de l'Alma underpass in Paris while under the influence of drink.

  2. #2
    3Vandoo's Avatar
    3Vandoo is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Bandit County
    Posts
    0
    This is funny

    Without permission of the brits

    under the intel act and agreements, the UK cannot spy on Diana so they ask their sister agencies either in the US or Canada

  3. #3
    J.S.N.'s Avatar
    J.S.N. is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    all up in yo' buttho'
    Posts
    2,720
    Quote Originally Posted by 3Vandoo
    This is funny

    Without permission of the brits

    under the intel act and agreements, the UK cannot spy on Diana so they ask their sister agencies either in the US or Canada
    yes, everyone knows that the uk spies on americans and the us spies on brit's for each other, and by everyone i mean everyone who knows jack shit about the way international illegence functions in western republics.

  4. #4
    BITTAPART2's Avatar
    BITTAPART2 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    anywhere my son lives
    Posts
    1,745
    exactly he did it the way we have been doing it for years, and the man had some good intel period. he didnt spy on his own here in the US like some other impatient arrogant doushbag did. not mentioning names

  5. #5
    J.S.N.'s Avatar
    J.S.N. is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    all up in yo' buttho'
    Posts
    2,720
    Quote Originally Posted by BITTAPART2
    exactly he did it the way we have been doing it for years, and the man had some good intel period. he didnt spy on his own here in the US like some other impatient arrogant doushbag did. not mentioning names
    well to be fair if the clinton admin wanted to spy on us they just had MI6 do it but i do agree it's much more dangerous to simply declare the constitution doesn't apply to you than to skirt around it.

  6. #6
    BITTAPART2's Avatar
    BITTAPART2 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    anywhere my son lives
    Posts
    1,745
    that has to be onje of the most stupid things that the far right believes, the thought that Bush needed to throw out the constitution to protect us? WTF b/c he isnt patient or tactfull enough to do what we have been doing for years, upholing the importance of our constitution and finding ways to find info out within the paramaters of the constitution. and as far as intel goes WE HAD ALL THE INTEL WE NEEDED TO PROTECT US FROM sep 11th! he got a friggin memo warning of the attacks and took NO precautions whatsoever to protect our country from this.

  7. #7
    Logan13's Avatar
    Logan13 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740
    Quote Originally Posted by BITTAPART2
    that has to be onje of the most stupid things that the far right believes, the thought that Bush needed to throw out the constitution to protect us? WTF b/c he isnt patient or tactfull enough to do what we have been doing for years, upholing the importance of our constitution and finding ways to find info out within the paramaters of the constitution. and as far as intel goes WE HAD ALL THE INTEL WE NEEDED TO PROTECT US FROM sep 11th! he got a friggin memo warning of the attacks and took NO precautions whatsoever to protect our country from this.
    No one has taken the necessary precautions. 9/11 was obviously not the first terrorist strike against US assets.......Question is how do we deal with this Today!

  8. #8
    BITTAPART2's Avatar
    BITTAPART2 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    anywhere my son lives
    Posts
    1,745
    thats the new foxhole from the far right as well....dont dwell on the fact that our president grossly underestimated his intelligence that was brought to him regarding 911 (the worst an most substanstial attack in us history) just figure out how the next administration will try and deal with the mess. the only way to deal w/ this today is to build a time machine, count the votes again and make sure W doesnt set foot in a position of power ever again

  9. #9
    LawMan018's Avatar
    LawMan018 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,661
    Quote Originally Posted by BITTAPART2
    exactly he did it the way we have been doing it for years, and the man had some good intel period. he didnt spy on his own here in the US like some other impatient arrogant doushbag did. not mentioning names
    Amen!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •