Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    mcpeepants's Avatar
    mcpeepants is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    822

    Blair to announce Iraq withdrawal plan

    Blair to announce Iraq withdrawal plan

    By DAVID STRINGER, Associated Press Writer 29 minutes ago

    LONDON - Britain will withdraw nearly half its troops from
    Iraq by the end of the year if local forces can secure the southern part of the country, Prime Minister
    Tony Blair planned to announce Wednesday.
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Around 1,500 of Britain's 7,000-strong force will return home shortly, a British government official said on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak before Blair's statement. Britain has long been America's biggest coalition partner in Iraq.

    Another coalition member, Denmark, was also expected to announce plans to begin withdrawing its troops from Iraq, Danish media reported. Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen had earlier said he hoped Denmark would begin scaling back its 460-troop contingent this year, without setting a precise timetable.

    Blair's office said the British leader would make a statement on Iraq and the Middle East to Britain's parliament following his weekly House of Commons questions session. It would not disclose the content.

    But the official said Blair planned to outline a strategy which would leave about 4,000 British soldiers in southern Iraq by the end of 2007 if the security there is sufficient.

    Blair and
    President Bush talked by secure video link Tuesday morning about the proposals, U.S. National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe said. Bush views Britain's troop cutbacks as "a sign of success" in Iraq, he said.

    "While the United Kingdom is maintaining a robust force in southern Iraq, we're pleased that conditions in Basra have improved sufficiently that they are able to transition more control to the Iraqis," Johndroe said.

    British Defense Secretary Des Browne, who planned to speak to reporters following Blair's statement, said in November he believed the number of British troops based in Iraq would be "significantly lower by a matter of thousands" by the end of 2007.

    Browne and Blair held talks last month with U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates in London. Gates told a news conference in Brussels on Jan. 15, that Britain was "planning a drawdown at some point this year in their forces in the south."

    According to the Brookings Institution, other major partners in the coalition include
    South Korea (2,300 troops), Poland (900), Australia and Georgia (both 800) and Romania (600).

    Blair's announcement comes as Bush sends 21,000 more troops to Iraq. Analysts say there is little point in boosting forces in the largely Shiite south of Iraq, where most non-U.S. coalition troops are concentrated.

    Countries' drawing down or pulling out troops could create a security vacuum if radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr stirs up trouble.

    Militarily, a British withdrawal is not likely to have much effect on the stepped-up U.S. operation in Baghdad or the war with the Sunnis in Anbar province west of the Iraqi capital.

    Gates said Basra's security situation was much different than Baghdad's and that the plan would probably not affect on the work of U.S. forces

    "We want to bring our troops homes as well," Johndroe said. "It's the model we want to emulate, to turn over more responsibilities to Iraqis and bring our troops home. That's the goal and always has been."

    Blair, who is expected to step down from office by September after a decade in power, has seen his foreign-policy record overshadowed by his role as Bush's leading ally in the unpopular war.

    As recently as late last month, Blair rejected opposition calls to withdraw British troops by October, calling such a plan irresponsible.

    "That would send the most disastrous signal to the people that we are fighting in Iraq. It's a policy that, whatever its superficial attractions may be, is actually deeply irresponsible," Blair said on Jan. 24 in the Commons.

  2. #2
    DTBusta's Avatar
    DTBusta is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    245
    great , someone tell Bush we need even more troops.Oh wait he knew about this already, this is why they need the surge...Some are saying that this some 7,000 out by the end of the year in that specific province will cause shite to shite civil war?

  3. #3
    singern's Avatar
    singern is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Chicago/Israel
    Posts
    946
    Why so pessimistic, Hopefully the Iraqis will Man-Up and control the terrorists on there own, and then all foreign troops can go home, After all isnt that the goal.

    The glass is still half full...........
    Last edited by singern; 02-22-2007 at 09:57 AM.

  4. #4
    DTBusta's Avatar
    DTBusta is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    245
    hopefully...yes... not pessimistic though, some have learned not to trust the current leadership in both countries, and for very good reasons... wmd, false intelligence, fake intelligence ect..But if it works and they do man up then great..but along with England about 3 other countries announced they were leaving. Be it that they only had less than a thousand guys each it still isn't a great sign. Isn't that considered the "pulling out" . Cheny says thats a bad thing and compares those in this country, Usa that want this , to "emboldening the terrorists."-...........friggin hypocrytes.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •