Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359

    Myostatin blockers are already banned

    Next-Generation Sports Doping
    http://www.technologyreview.com/Biotech/19623/

    Two new classes of experimental drugs shown to have powerful muscle-building capabilities--selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) and myostatin inhibitors--have been added to the World Anti-Doping Agency's (WADA) list of prohibited substances for 2008. Neither class of drugs is yet on the market. But the agency, an international, independent organization based in Lausanne, Switzerland, that coordinates anti-doping regulations across sports, is gearing up for future abuse by limiting use among athletes and by developing new detection methods. "We now have convincing data on those drugs and what they can do," says Olivier Rabin, science director at WADA. "We have a duty to act as early as we can when drugs have the potential to be doping agents."

    Unlike with testosterone and other anabolic steroids , the action of SARMs and myostatin inhibitors is restricted to muscle, likely limiting side effects. That's a very good thing for patients, but it also makes the drugs more attractive to those looking to bulk up. "I think there's a whole new horizon for anabolic therapies, and the potential for abuse will be exceedingly high," says William Evans, director of the Nutrition, Metabolism, and Exercise Laboratory at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

    Compounds of both classes are currently in clinical trials for muscle wasting related to diseases such as cancer and muscular dystrophy. There have been no official reports of athletes using these drugs, but because there previously have been cases of athletes gaining access to compounds in clinical development, WADA officials say that they want to act early.

    SARMs work similarly to testosterone but in a more targeted way. "They are effective by binding to the steroid receptor in only specific tissue, like muscle," says Evans, who is also a scientific advisor to GTx, a company developing the drugs. "They are not steroid drugs, but they produce the anabolic effect of the steroids." GTx, based in Memphis, TN, has shown in a clinical trial that one compound being developed for muscle wasting and bone loss can significantly boost lean muscle mass in older people.

    Myostatin inhibitors work through a fundamentally different mechanism. They block myostatin, a naturally occurring protein in the body that stops growth of skeletal muscle. Cattle, sheep, dogs, and, in one confirmed case, a human with mutations in this gene are extremely muscular. (See "Mimicking the Massively Muscular.")

    Scientists have developed antibodies to myostatin and other molecules that can boost lean muscle mass in animals by as much as 60 percent. It's not yet clear how well myostatin inhibitors will work in humans. Clinical studies of two myostatin inhibitors are now under way for muscular dystrophy and other muscle-wasting diseases.

    WADA is developing detection methods for both SARMs and myostatin inhibitors, although the agency declined to say how far along those tests are. "In fairness to athletes who stay clean, we don't say when detection tools are available," says Rabin. "We say when we detect the first athletes using the drugs."
    More in the link.

    This is such bullshit. No one even knows if these substances are dangerous yet. If they are safe, something even the IOC ****nuts acknoweledge they might be, why the **** should they be prohibited by sports federations? If they are not dangerous why the **** is it "abuse" to use it to build muscle.

    God I hate those stupid sons of bitches.

  2. #2
    Pheedno is offline Respected Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Miller's Crossing
    Posts
    6,270
    Actually, the only 3 people that I've seen with documented cases of myostatin inhibition have all been seen to have no effect, with the exception towards skeletal muscle. In other words heart, lung and various other smooth muscle functions were not effected.
    It seems as if they're taking a "better safe than sorry" approach, which is unfortunate. Granted, research in this particular capacity isn't the same, but think of today if that kind of mentality was garnished on all medical research.

  3. #3
    Elite1287 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    45
    its not even out yet and its banned...wtf. it seems incredible though

  4. #4
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by Pheedno
    Actually, the only 3 people that I've seen with documented cases of myostatin inhibition have all been seen to have no effect, with the exception towards skeletal muscle. In other words heart, lung and various other smooth muscle functions were not effected.
    It seems as if they're taking a "better safe than sorry" approach, which is unfortunate. Granted, research in this particular capacity isn't the same, but think of today if that kind of mentality was garnished on all medical research.
    Interesting to hear, I cant wait untill this stuff gets out on the market.

    This is just another example of "the precautionary principle" gone terribly wrong. Assume everything is horribly dangerous until proven safe, which is offcourse impossible to do even in principle.

    But the WADA probably hasnt any health concerns in mind. Its just the ideological bs that any enhancement to performance that isnt "natural" is wrong.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •