http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...n8w&refer=home
Stop firing rockets and there might be a end to this....
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...n8w&refer=home
Stop firing rockets and there might be a end to this....
There will never be an end, israel still has thier land, and the boarders are still locked down.. The people in Gaza are dieing, they might aswell fight..
A few relevant points from the same article you quoted.
First point:
Israel’s operation in Gaza, which left more than 1,300 Palestinians and 13 Israelis [soldiers]dead
source: same article you linked to
Of those, 50% were confirmed women and children:
Those 1,000-plus dead Gazans are broken down into percentages defined in terms of women and children and the rest. The earliest figures stated that about 25 per cent of Gaza's dead were women and children , and that has steadily climbed close to the 50 per cent mark since Israel's ground invasion got under way.And here is a number to put that into perspective:
http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache...lnk&cd=5&gl=us
One point five MILLION!
Second point:
Israel’s operation in Gaza...was said by the military to be aimed at stopping Hamas from firing rockets into Israeli territory. More than 30 rockets and mortar shells have been fired since Israel declared the [unilateral] cease-fire.
source: from the same article you linked to
Remember: all of you had justified the massive murder of Gazan civilians by saying that it was a-ok because it was the only way to stop rockets being fired at Israel. And was it not all of us who told you that no matter how massive Israel's response was, it could not stop the rocket attacks? Rather, the only way to stop the rocket attacks was through negotiating a peace treaty or mutual ceasefire? Do we not now see how the only few months in which no rockets were fired were when the two sides had agreed to a ceasefire, which Israel then broke?
If the rockets started up again so quickly, what was the point of murdering 1,000+ Palestinians?
Third point:
The rockets were fired by other than Hamas to begin with:
Responsibility for today’s attack on Ashkelon was claimed by a Gaza militant group affiliated with the Lebanese Shiite Muslim Hezbollah, which fought a monthlong war with Israel in 2006.
source: from the same article you linked to
Fourth point:
Those who fired the rocket gave the exact same reason for firing them as Israel gives for devastating Gaza:
“In a continuation of revenge for our people’s blood, members of our rockets unit today fired two rockets,” the group, the Brigades of Hezbollah in Palestine, said in a leaflet faxed to journalists.
source: from the same article you linked to
So Israel says it is retaliating for rocket attacks, and the militants say the exact same thing.
Fifth point:
The ceasefire was "unilateral", meaning Hamas was given no input on the matter. It is like me jumping you from behind, beating you up, raping you, and then just when you are about to retaliate, I say "ceasefire!" Having said that, Hamas did agree to a one-week ceasefire, which brings me to my sixth point.
Sixth point:
Gaza is blockaded on all sides, a tactic used since ancient times to starve out a people to death. This is the crux of the matter, and anyone who cannot see that is blind:
Hamas is conditioning its agreement [to a permanent ceasefire] on Israel opening border crossings into Gaza.
source: from the same article you linked to
And from another article:
One aspect of the blockade that seems to have been overlooked is the way it has been used to soften up Gaza...For three years Gaza's population has been denied food, medicines and fuel.
http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache...lnk&cd=5&gl=us
According to the United Nations, Palestinians are dying because of this blockade. According to everyone, no Israelis have died since the rocket attacks on Israel have resumed. So why is it that you are only focusing on the rocket attacks which kill nobody and not the starving out a people to death which *is* killing people? One point five MILLION Palestinians have been injured by Israel, and you are worrying about a few rockets that land on the side of the road?
Last edited by BuffedGuy; 02-03-2009 at 12:24 PM.
because if hamas did not start this with rockets then the 1.5 million you have stated over and over would not be getting hurt.....
in bold..........
buff 90% of your thread are about palestinians so what if i write about israel both side of the story is always a good thing..dont you think??????/
Last edited by *RAGE*; 02-03-2009 at 01:03 PM.
You can live without food for sometime, i think depending on the person, upto 6/7 weeks maybe longer...
I would live longer lol because i would eat my toe nails, snot and hair..
I wonder if Hamas will ever get to preach to the world about their Concentration Camp that they live in, and people starving? Or do the Jews have the Holocaust market cornered?![]()
***No source checks!!!***
Israel’s air force attacked targets in the Gaza Strip, saying it was responding to Qassam rockets, mortar shells and Grad missiles fired at the country in recent days. these rockets and missiles sound kind of expensive, im sure they cost more than a few hundred dollars... point is if humus (another bad dont mess with Zohan joke) chose to keep that money and not fire it back at israel they would have more money to feed the people the govern.
“It appears that Hamas is out to deliberately undermine any chance for quiet,” said Mark Regev, spokesman for Olmert. “In allowing the launching of deadly rockets at Israeli cities, Hamas alone holds responsibility for any possible escalation.” hamas is going to get pounded a gain just imo, i didnt say they should but israel is going to make an example of them... and prob have the worlds permission- because simply hamas wont stop the attacks
I love how people somehow try to justify what happened in Gaza in those three weeks was perfectly fine.
that is not what I am saying......DO i think israel is justified in defieding its self yes. Is it sad that innocent people die..yes....buff if it does not go your way you dont want to talk about it..hamas fired rockets....trying to kill israels did they guess not but were they trying....yes.....you are one sided....
Oh brother.. so now the Palis have the "right"
to fire rockets also.
Of course Israel has the right to defend itself. It does not have the right to shoot through women and children to get to it's target. People can argue that Hamas deliberately hid in places they considered safe, but Israel still pulled the trigger. 1400 dead innocent people to get to a handful of Hamas, surely you cannot think that is acceptable?
What im trying to say mate, is how would you feel if you saw the police shooting through customers and staff to get to armed bank robbers?
Hamas has said LITERALLY "We do not target civilians; rather, we fire rockets at Israel, and since they are not smart missiles they just land wherever." Do I agree with this justification? No. But do I see that it is the same thing Israel claims when it devastates civilian areas? Yes. So does Hamas get away with what it does by chanting "Palestine has the right to defend itself" ? If not, then why does Isreal get away with this mantra? B-i-g-o-t-r-y. Jews can do no harm, and Muslims are devil worshipers.
I dont believe this is the case I think that is how it is being put out in the new....I can not say for sure because I am not there but I have a lot of experience in this kind of work and not one targets women and children...so I think it is on which new case do you believe...
They targeted schools and hospitals. You KNOW they targeted these areas and they didn't give a damn who died to get to their intended target. I can produce sources if you would like, SHOWING what was hit, and how many people were killed if you like? If it wasn't for a UN building being hit, who knows how much longer they would have go on for.
The sad part of this is, Hamas is not going to stop. And what is going to happen, is soon Gaza will cease to exist.
Prehaps Buffed is one sided on the basis of his Faith.
I am not religious, I am a scientist first. But I agree with Buff. Hamas needs to go, that much is simple...but why cant you see that the Israeli attack was exactly the same as Hamas only on a much bigger scale? I have a friend that is Palestinian, and she is currently in the UAE, and I think it's terrible that one day her home could cease to exist. Why can't you see that Israel are doing to the Palestinians what Germany was doing to Jewish people 60 years ago?
this is a very true statement....and for this I am sad...now you might not want to believe this but i dont have a problem with anyone but hamas
I feel that hamas is to blame in this now I am not say that israel is not to blame for some of the way they handled this...I am not a supporter of israel like this thread sounds....I have other issues that would talk to you on pm or some other way
No problem Buffed. You remind me a little of another member on this board who was very religious, but he passed away some time ago. Even though he strongly valued his faith, he was very polite and very wise.
Prone, at least we can all agree that Hamas needs to go. I just dont think bombing Gaza flat is the answer. We are supposed to be living in civilised times, what the Hell happened to diplomatic relations? We can all argue till we're blue in the face "who attacked who first", that argument is not valid any longer. What does matter is that there has to be a peaceful resolution and there have to be concesions made on BOTH SIDES. Yes, I know the world is a harsh place but we can't go on like this forever.
You keep presupposing that Israel is *only* attacking as a retaliation. I disagree with your belief in the first place (since unlike you, I see that both sides argue that they are "retaliating")...almost no aggressor on earth has proudly said that they are guilty of aggression; rather, they almost always hide under the feeble excuse of "defense." Even when Adolf Hitler invaded various lands, he said that this was in defense, and he justified it.
So to answer your question: of course I believe that Israel will continue to attack Palestinians regardless of what Palestinians do or do not do. This is the logical conclusion one can draw just by looking at the historical record. But of course, when you always say that one side is 'retaliating' whenever it attacks, and the other side is always guilty of aggression whenever it attacks, then I do not think you can ever reach a just conclusion on the matter.
As a strong proof, I say what I've repeated a hundred times on this forum: Hamas fired zero rockets during the ceasefire months, and Israel still bombed them. So yeah, I--like the Palestinian people themselves--have realized that there is no way to prevent the Israeli aggression. To always put the blame on the Palestinians (i.e. "YOU brought this upon YOURSELVES") is like when people blame the rape victim instead of laying the blame at the feet of the rapist. The Palestinians have understood what the Native Americans took a long time to understand as well: they can do nothing to prevent the colonial power from devouring their land and depriving them of their rights. No matter what the Palestinians do, the Israelis will generate an excuse to attack.
To conclude: the answer to your question is beyond obvious.
Last edited by BuffedGuy; 02-03-2009 at 04:11 PM.
You can't ask two opposing warrior cultures to lay down their weapons and "talk it out", Hamas is clearly not interested in talking about anything of any merit. Israel is clearly not interested in allowing Hamas to exist so close to home. Neither will stop until the other is dead.
Israel only exists today because they told the world to **** off and did what they had to do in their early years to survive.
Not everyone is meant to live...some people have to die violently. The strong survive, and the meak perish. It's the way it always has been and always will be.
You can't save everyone.
I say let them fight it out, and party with the winner.![]()
The underlined part is complete baloney. It is Israel that refuses to talk, whereas Hamas has continually said they are willing to negotiate and compromise even back to the 1967 borders. If Israel is not even willing to concede to this, then it is quite clear which side is "not being a partner for peace." As for your claim that "Israel is not interested in Hamas existing so close to home", that is just white-washing what the reality is: Israelis believe that God gave them the land of Eretz Israel and they will annihilate anyone who gets in their way of that religious right. They want the land, simple as that.
Yes, the difference is that the land belongs to Palestine, not Israel. It's part of the half of the land which the United Nations mandate bequeathed to Palestinians. So your argument is as illogical as saying "USA wants New York, Russia wants New York, so let them fight over it and winner gets it."
Hitler wanted Poland. Poland wanted Poland. Someone will lose, eventually.Someone will lose, eventually.
No Jew on earth would accept the "might is right" argument when it came to Hitler's Nazi Germany. No French person would accept it when it came to Paris. Yet suddenly we're supposed to accept it when it comes to our land? Absurd.
My point being that if they were allowed to fight it out, the loser will have no choice but to accept it...because the loser will be dead.
That to me seems better than bitching about everything. It's simple.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)