Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Eliminate domestic drilling, an Obama initiative

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    34,255

    Eliminate domestic drilling, an Obama initiative

    WASHINGTON - The Obama administration on Tuesday overturned another Bush-era energy policy, setting aside a draft plan to allow drilling off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts.

    "To establish an orderly process that allows us to make wise decisions based on sound information, we need to set aside" the plan "and create our own timeline," Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced in a statement.

    Alleging that the Bush administration "had torpedoed" offshore renewable energy in favor of oil and natural gas, Salazar said he was extending the public comment period by 6 months.

    "The additional time we are providing will give states, stakeholders, and affected communities the opportunity to provide input on the future of our offshore areas," he said.

    Salazar also ordered Interior Department experts to compile a report on the Outer Continental Shelf's energy potential — not just oil and gas, but also renewables like wind and wave energy.

    "In the biggest area that the Bush administration’s draft OCS plan proposes for oil and gas drilling — the Atlantic seaboard, from Maine to Florida — our data on available resources is very thin, and what little we have is twenty to thirty years old," he said. "We shouldn't make decisions to sell off taxpayer resources based on old information."

    The Interior Department oversees 1.75 billion acres on the Outer Continental Shelf, an area that's about three fourths the size of the entire United States.

    Environmentalists and some tourism-dependent coastal states oppose the drilling, citing the potential for spills and urging an emphasis on renewable energy instead. Energy companies counter that drilling has become safer over the years and that royalties from any finds would be in the billions of dollars.

    "I intend to issue a final rulemaking ... in the coming months, so that potential developers know the rules of the road," Salazar said. "This rulemaking will allow us to move from the 'oil and gas only' approach of the previous administration to the comprehensive energy plan that we need."

    "We need a new, comprehensive energy plan that takes us to the new energy frontier and secures our energy independence," he added. "We must embrace President Obama's vision of energy independence for the sake of our national security, our economic security, and our environmental security."

    Moratorium ended last year
    The Bush administration had authorized the Interior Department to open areas off both coasts to oil and gas drilling during a five-year period. That move came after a moratorium on drilling there expired last year. Offshore drilling is already allowed in the Gulf of Mexico.

    Both Obama and Salazar have said that expanding offshore oil drilling should be worked out with Congress as part of a broad energy blueprint, and not independent action by the Interior Department.

    The move comes a week after the Interior Department shelved energy leases on 130,000 acres near two national parks and other federally protected lands in Utah.

    In Congress, Democrats have long wanted to rewrite the rules on royalties from offshore drilling, arguing that energy companies have been paying too little.

    Rep. Ed Markey, D-Mass., praised the move as an end to "drill first and ask questions later".

    "The tide has turned back towards reason and a comprehensive energy plan for our country that sees promise in the winds and the tides, not just in drills and rigs," added Markey, who chairs the select committee on energy independence and global warming.

    But House Republicans last week urged Obama not to close areas off the Atlantic and Pacific coastlines.

    "We respectfully urge that you allow the five-year offshore drilling plan to continue because it is vital to our economy," the lawmakers, led by House Republican leader John Boehner, said in a letter. "Our country needs to remain on the path to American energy independence, and we believe this is a critical and achievable goal."

    Jack Gerard, president of the American Petroleum Institute, which represents the large oil companies, said Salazar's announcement "means that development of our offshore resources could be stalled indefinitely."

    31 lease sales were proposed
    The preliminary plan drawn up by the Bush administration would have authorized 31 energy exploration lease sales between 2010 and 2015 for tracts along the East Coast and off the coasts of Alaska and California.

    The Republican lawmakers cited a study that concluded the untapped offshore oil and gas reserves would create more than 160,000 jobs by 2030 and provide the government with $1.7 trillion in royalties on the oil and gas drilled.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29119940/

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    34,255
    What's the point of stimulating the ecomony, when a worldwide recovery is sure to send gas prices soaring and be the limiting factor?

    Throw a trillion dollars of spending around so we can have $200 per barrel oil without any thoughts of preperation for a recovery.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Labyrinth
    Posts
    14,491
    kratos <3 Obama

  4. #4
    In case anyone missed colbert report:

    George bush's energy advisor

    the exxon tiger, lol

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    34,255
    Quote Originally Posted by JiGGaMaN View Post
    In case anyone missed colbert report:

    George bush's energy advisor

    the exxon tiger, lol
    ....or the American public when gas was at $5 a gallon crying "oh God make it stop." Which it did when the world economy went to crap, which oil prices played a major role in. What happens upon recovery if that's what Obama is trying to acheive?
    alternative energy? Can I fill my gas tank with wind made electricity? Ever seen an electric airplane or tractor trailor truck that didn't come from a hobby store? How about the countless miles of Rail that aren't electrified for freight and passenger transport? You can make all the alternative power you want, higher gas prices are still going to limit what the economy can support. A quick look at our current transportation system should make that clear.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in dreamy land
    Posts
    33,788
    stupid morons

    in the words of larry kudlow: "DRILL, DRILL, DRILL!!"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    270
    Let's just depend on the middle east to supply all of our energy needs. Thats a great strategy!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    4,264
    Nothing wrong with the "Let's use their oil first" strategy. No need to burn it all up when it might come in handy to make drugs, fertilizer, electronics, etc etc etc.

    Ya, at $5 a gallon for gas, and liklihood that it'll get back up there once the US economy gets going again, it's time to find something else.

    BTW, have any of y'all see the tens of thousands of electric generating windmills around Amarillo, Texas? There's lots more out there than there were 6 years ago. And they're setting up lots more. IMHO, a good idea. A better idea would be to build cities there. Use the electricity to power factories to make stuff, and bring US manufacturing jobs back.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,983
    Ya know how when you look at the tag on a tshirt it says made in China. Why can't they do that at the gas pump? It could say 25% USA, 25% Canada, 50% OPEC terrorists...

    I mean why not?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    34,255
    Quote Originally Posted by Tock View Post
    Nothing wrong with the "Let's use their oil first" strategy. No need to burn it all up when it might come in handy to make drugs, fertilizer, electronics, etc etc etc.

    Ya, at $5 a gallon for gas, and liklihood that it'll get back up there once the US economy gets going again, it's time to find something else.

    BTW, have any of y'all see the tens of thousands of electric generating windmills around Amarillo, Texas? There's lots more out there than there were 6 years ago. And they're setting up lots more. IMHO, a good idea. A better idea would be to build cities there. Use the electricity to power factories to make stuff, and bring US manufacturing jobs back.
    While I agree with you to some extent...using their oil first is not a bad idea. The oil we're talking about here is several years away from making it to market. If the US recovers, so does China, the 3rd word, and every other oil buying nation. 1 year ago, it was proven the global output for oil can't meet that demand. It's not theoretical, they were pumping all they could and the price was still going up. Also, being at the mercy of OPEC is a threat to national security. We need to plan ahead and be realistic about what our economy needs vs what is idealistic thinking.

    The ultimate goal is to greatly reduce US oil consumption while retaining the same level of economic efficency.

    Providing cheap power no doubt will encourage power hungry factories to relocate to the US. For example I read something about Iceland's Aluminum industry as a result of all the geothermal and hydo power they have.

    I think the bottom line for me is we're dependant on oil and we can change that over the next couple of decades, but we need to remain prepared. I think if you put it to a vote most Americans would not be for this action.
    Last edited by Kratos; 02-12-2009 at 09:07 AM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    270
    I agree with Kratos 100%. I could not have said it better.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,541
    Quote Originally Posted by FallenWyvern View Post
    Ya know how when you look at the tag on a tshirt it says made in China. Why can't they do that at the gas pump? It could say 25% USA, 25% Canada, 50% OPEC terrorists...

    I mean why not?
    I like ur statement.. hehe

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Front toward enemy
    Posts
    6,265
    Well when is a good time to stop using oil? Never? It's not going to be around forever. Sir Nicholas Stern claims if we invested into renewable technologies now, only 1% of global per capita per consumption per year would be needed to cover costs. If we leave this till oil has practically run out, that could be as high as 20%. People need to start looking a little further than what affects them now, and look at how hard they could be hit later.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    34,255
    Quote Originally Posted by Flagg View Post
    Well when is a good time to stop using oil? Never? It's not going to be around forever. Sir Nicholas Stern claims if we invested into renewable technologies now, only 1% of global per capita per consumption per year would be needed to cover costs. If we leave this till oil has practically run out, that could be as high as 20%. People need to start looking a little further than what affects them now, and look at how hard they could be hit later.
    Sir Nicholas Stern is a global warming nut, what do you expect?
    Yes, we need to end our dependence on oil. When is a good time? When we can sustain an economy without it or at least much less. So, now is the time to invest in alternative technologies without creating a disruption in the oil supply. It's easier to divert resources to alternative energy in a functioning economy.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •