View Poll Results: do you agree with this?
- Voters
- 21. You may not vote on this poll
-
yes
11 52.38% -
no
10 47.62%
Thread: This is getting out of hand.
-
04-15-2011, 11:54 AM #81Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- The Beach
- Posts
- 1,524
How is anything I have said not on point. These are the reasons that airport security is what it is.
So the guy in time square had FIREWORKS in a truck. How is that a terroist threat. That is one of the stupidest things ever. A bunch of bottle rockets and M-80's thats a ****ing joke.
And some idiot tring to light his shoes on fire on a plane. Bad example. You think that warrents the right to to grope little children. You sir have no valid points Latissumus. These are all horrible reasons to treat good patriotic Americans like terroist threats.
-
04-15-2011, 04:25 PM #82
-
04-16-2011, 12:03 AM #83
-
04-16-2011, 12:07 AM #84
so messed up...
-
04-16-2011, 08:32 AM #85
voting is being skewed I'M SURE
-
04-16-2011, 12:25 PM #86
-
04-18-2011, 02:13 AM #87
Isnt this exactly what we are supposed to teach our children? Teach them it's OK for some strange adult to touch you anywhere they want, everywhere and you are supposed to just stand there and let them do it as long as they have some type of uniform on or a superior of some type. I'm sure kids dont have a problem getting confused by all the mixed messages.
I agree with a lot of the comments both ways. Many have valid points but I think profiling should be used since that is what it's designed for. If I am mugged by a 6' 4" 190bl Asian guy with spiked black hair, tiger tattoo on his left arm etc I would be a little pissed if I was called in for a lineup of Hispanic and Caucasian guys all 5' 10" or under and 200 lbs or a bunch of women/dykes.
I have not heard of many kids carrying bombs into or out of the US. Yes it's getting out of hand and just stupid. Yes it has it's purpose but it's being misused and abused. Now instead of people wanting to become a priest they only have to apply to become a TSA officer.
-
04-18-2011, 02:38 PM #88
-
04-18-2011, 03:56 PM #89
The government and media keep telling people in America that Muslims are terrorist. They say this to Americans everyday that middle east is riddled with terrorist who want to bomb are planes and are country. Thats why we have HLS and TSA and other terrorist programs everyone can agree on that right?
so when they tell people this all day everyday, it seems to me we should be profiling these people "Muslims" it would make sense right?
but for some reason we keep going after regular citizens of this country with clearly no intention of bombing things.
this begin the case we should pull aside every Muslim in a airport and do the TSA on them. since they are the ones supposedly trying to bomb us right? "they should understand its for there safety"
it just seem very contradicting to harass everyone that goes through the airport when we have never even had a hijacking since 9/11 and that never really happened anyway.
how many whit black chines Korean Indian German Italian Iris.whatever , have ever hijacked a plane.
-
04-18-2011, 04:07 PM #90Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- The Beach
- Posts
- 1,524
Do you really consider the TSA agents trusted members of law enforcment? Have you seen these people or talked to them. They are uneducated idiots, for the most part. They are not trained law enforcement.
-
04-18-2011, 04:12 PM #91
I know that you don't want to believe it (you think its an inside job), but the underwear bomber was black. Also post up the numbers of Arabs, Sheiks, and Persians who have been patted down by the TSA. I can pretty much guarantee the numbers outweigh any other demographic by far. Lastly the TSA isn't only looking for just terrorists, they are instructed to look for any and all contraband.
So are many cops and corrections officers (especially outsourced corrections officers). Whether you like it or not, TSA is considered members of law enforcement and HLS, just like the Border Patrol.
-
04-18-2011, 04:53 PM #92Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- The Beach
- Posts
- 1,524
So are many cops and corrections officers (especially outsourced corrections officers). Whether you like it or not, TSA is considered members of law enforcement and HLS, just like the Border Patrol.[/QUOTE]
Damn, BgMc we agree on something. There is hope after all. i think you are coming around brother.
-
04-18-2011, 05:11 PM #93
^^^HOLY SHIT!!! ARMAGEDDON IS UPON US!!!!! Hahahahahahahahha!
-
04-18-2011, 05:21 PM #94Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- The Beach
- Posts
- 1,524
I know, soon you are going to be banging on my door wanting some of my food and water i have stocked up. Im afraid that you will eat it all in one sitting tho.
-
04-19-2011, 03:55 AM #95
I have noticed on a lot of threads you like to use the term flawed logic. A lot of flawed logic is nothing more than personal opinions. In my view I can see different scenarios than the ones you are stating. Yes in yours it makes sense and I think it does in mine also but no need to get into yet another useless debate over opinions.
Maybe there is no perfect answer but I think many of the things that are happening are wrong and useless. I'm sure some is just media hype and hopefully this is not the norm but the exception.
-
04-19-2011, 12:21 PM #96
im sorry, but this is a ****ing joke 588 views and 20 votes. what are ppl so scared of just vote.
-
04-19-2011, 02:02 PM #97
-
04-19-2011, 02:16 PM #98
you can only vote once. just don't get it, why ppl are so scared or blind to the vote button.
-
04-19-2011, 02:26 PM #99
quite a few hangin chads i reckon
-
04-19-2011, 05:09 PM #100Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- The Beach
- Posts
- 1,524
Be careful what you say about the TSA!
http://www.naturalnews.com/032126_TSA_travelers.html
-
04-19-2011, 05:39 PM #101
-
04-19-2011, 05:44 PM #102
if they stayed away from my threads or did not see it as an issue there wouldn't be 588 views,
-
04-19-2011, 06:41 PM #103
In that case^ ^The lack on votes reflect that most people don't see the pat downs as an issue ...
-
04-19-2011, 09:10 PM #104
not trying to Carty this on but they should just vote no then.
-
04-20-2011, 03:09 PM #105Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- The Beach
- Posts
- 1,524
Here you go, even your trusted lawmakers in Washington think this infringes on our rights as American Citizens:
(NaturalNews) Several state legislators are outraged over the US Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) continued and escalating assaults against individual freedom, personal privacy, and even the Constitution itself, through the use of naked body scanners and full-body pat downs. So these lawmakers from Hawaii and several other US states are banding together to form the "United States for Travel Freedom" (USTF) caucus, whose aim is to pass state laws that combat TSA tyranny (http://www.akhealthcaucus.org/TSA.php).
When Alaska Representative Sharon Cissna, a breast cancer survivor, was recently pulled aside after going through the naked body scanner at a Colorado airport, agents insisted that she also undergo a full-body pat down. TSA agents had detected Cissna's breast implant, which was the result of a mastectomy she underwent, and insisted that she also be felt up by a TSA agent. When she refused, agents would not let her proceed, and instead she had to find an alternate form of travel.
Similar incidents in other states, including the recent, inappropriate full-body pat down of a six year old girl (http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_...), have been the tipping point for many states that have decided, enough is enough. Thus, legislators in several US states are fighting back against the TSA's gross violation of privacy and freedom by working to pass airport security legislation that bars the TSA from certain invasive protocols.
In Hawaii, Sen. Sam Slom introduced Senate Bill 1150, "Relating to the use of Body Imaging Scanners at Airports," which would prohibit the use of non-consensual naked body scanners at Hawaii airports. The bill was never given a proper hearing at the time it was introduced, but Sen. Slom has said it will be reintroduced again in 2012.
In Michigan, Rep. Eileen Kowall introduced the latest version of House Resolution 368 in 2010, which would fully prohibit the use of naked body scanners and full-body pat downs in airports, citing the procedures' explicit constitutional violations.
Other states with TSA legislation include Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington.
Sources for this story include:
http://www.hawaiireporter.com/hawai...
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032122_TS...#ixzz1K68xjYNB
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS