View Poll Results: do you agree with this?

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • yes

    11 52.38%
  • no

    10 47.62%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 105 of 105
  1. #81
    JJ78 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The Beach
    Posts
    1,524
    How is anything I have said not on point. These are the reasons that airport security is what it is.

    So the guy in time square had FIREWORKS in a truck. How is that a terroist threat. That is one of the stupidest things ever. A bunch of bottle rockets and M-80's thats a ****ing joke.

    And some idiot tring to light his shoes on fire on a plane. Bad example. You think that warrents the right to to grope little children. You sir have no valid points Latissumus. These are all horrible reasons to treat good patriotic Americans like terroist threats.

  2. #82
    zaggahamma's Avatar
    zaggahamma is offline Mr. Moderation
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    19,486
    Quote Originally Posted by JJ78 View Post
    How is anything I have said not on point. These are the reasons that airport security is what it is.

    So the guy in time square had FIREWORKS in a truck. How is that a terroist threat. That is one of the stupidest things ever. A bunch of bottle rockets and M-80's thats a ****ing joke.

    And some idiot tring to light his shoes on fire on a plane. Bad example. You think that warrents the right to to grope little children. You sir have no valid points Latissumus. These are all horrible reasons to treat good patriotic Americans like terroist threats.
    agree..

    i wonder what the trumpster has to say about this child molesting by the TSA....

    "tsa, youre FIRED!!!!!!"

  3. #83
    deladude's Avatar
    deladude is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    268
    Quote Originally Posted by BgMc31 View Post
    So if it were a little brown kid it would be ok?
    ........ yes

  4. #84
    massemotions's Avatar
    massemotions is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    49
    so messed up...

  5. #85
    zaggahamma's Avatar
    zaggahamma is offline Mr. Moderation
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    19,486
    voting is being skewed I'M SURE

  6. #86
    BgMc31's Avatar
    BgMc31 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Vegas, bitches!!!
    Posts
    3,855
    Quote Originally Posted by deladude View Post
    ........ Yes
    no!!!!

  7. #87
    lovbyts's Avatar
    lovbyts is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    30,260
    Isnt this exactly what we are supposed to teach our children? Teach them it's OK for some strange adult to touch you anywhere they want, everywhere and you are supposed to just stand there and let them do it as long as they have some type of uniform on or a superior of some type. I'm sure kids dont have a problem getting confused by all the mixed messages.

    I agree with a lot of the comments both ways. Many have valid points but I think profiling should be used since that is what it's designed for. If I am mugged by a 6' 4" 190bl Asian guy with spiked black hair, tiger tattoo on his left arm etc I would be a little pissed if I was called in for a lineup of Hispanic and Caucasian guys all 5' 10" or under and 200 lbs or a bunch of women/dykes.

    I have not heard of many kids carrying bombs into or out of the US. Yes it's getting out of hand and just stupid. Yes it has it's purpose but it's being misused and abused. Now instead of people wanting to become a priest they only have to apply to become a TSA officer.

  8. #88
    BgMc31's Avatar
    BgMc31 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Vegas, bitches!!!
    Posts
    3,855
    Quote Originally Posted by lovbyts View Post
    Isnt this exactly what we are supposed to teach our children? Teach them it's OK for some strange adult to touch you anywhere they want, everywhere and you are supposed to just stand there and let them do it as long as they have some type of uniform on or a superior of some type. I'm sure kids dont have a problem getting confused by all the mixed messages.
    Flawed logic. There is a difference between telling children not to let strange adults touch them in certain situations and having a trusted member of law enforcement pat you down when looking for certain items. These TSA pat downs aren't looking for just terrorists, there are some unscrupulous adults who will hide drugs and other items on their children.
    I agree with a lot of the comments both ways. Many have valid points but I think profiling should be used since that is what it's designed for. If I am mugged by a 6' 4" 190bl Asian guy with spiked black hair, tiger tattoo on his left arm etc I would be a little pissed if I was called in for a lineup of Hispanic and Caucasian guys all 5' 10" or under and 200 lbs or a bunch of women/dykes.
    Flawed logic again. You are confused about profiling. If you are assaulted by an Asian and you tell that to a police officer, a police officer is going to look for an Asian that fits your description. That is different when looking for someone who MAY perpetrate a crime.

    I have not heard of many kids carrying bombs into or out of the US. Yes it's getting out of hand and just stupid. Yes it has it's purpose but it's being misused and abused. Now instead of people wanting to become a priest they only have to apply to become a TSA officer.
    In bold...

  9. #89
    zabster151's Avatar
    zabster151 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    812
    The government and media keep telling people in America that Muslims are terrorist. They say this to Americans everyday that middle east is riddled with terrorist who want to bomb are planes and are country. Thats why we have HLS and TSA and other terrorist programs everyone can agree on that right?

    so when they tell people this all day everyday, it seems to me we should be profiling these people "Muslims" it would make sense right?
    but for some reason we keep going after regular citizens of this country with clearly no intention of bombing things.
    this begin the case we should pull aside every Muslim in a airport and do the TSA on them. since they are the ones supposedly trying to bomb us right? "they should understand its for there safety"
    it just seem very contradicting to harass everyone that goes through the airport when we have never even had a hijacking since 9/11 and that never really happened anyway.
    how many whit black chines Korean Indian German Italian Iris.whatever , have ever hijacked a plane.

  10. #90
    JJ78 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The Beach
    Posts
    1,524
    Do you really consider the TSA agents trusted members of law enforcment? Have you seen these people or talked to them. They are uneducated idiots, for the most part. They are not trained law enforcement.

  11. #91
    BgMc31's Avatar
    BgMc31 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Vegas, bitches!!!
    Posts
    3,855
    Quote Originally Posted by zabster151 View Post
    The government and media keep telling people in America that Muslims are terrorist. They say this to Americans everyday that middle east is riddled with terrorist who want to bomb are planes and are country. Thats why we have HLS and TSA and other terrorist programs everyone can agree on that right?

    so when they tell people this all day everyday, it seems to me we should be profiling these people "Muslims" it would make sense right?
    but for some reason we keep going after regular citizens of this country with clearly no intention of bombing things.
    this begin the case we should pull aside every Muslim in a airport and do the TSA on them. since they are the ones supposedly trying to bomb us right? "they should understand its for there safety"
    it just seem very contradicting to harass everyone that goes through the airport when we have never even had a hijacking since 9/11 and that never really happened anyway.
    how many whit black chines Korean Indian German Italian Iris.whatever , have ever hijacked a plane.
    I know that you don't want to believe it (you think its an inside job), but the underwear bomber was black. Also post up the numbers of Arabs, Sheiks, and Persians who have been patted down by the TSA. I can pretty much guarantee the numbers outweigh any other demographic by far. Lastly the TSA isn't only looking for just terrorists, they are instructed to look for any and all contraband.

    Quote Originally Posted by JJ78 View Post
    Do you really consider the TSA agents trusted members of law enforcment? Have you seen these people or talked to them. They are uneducated idiots, for the most part. They are not trained law enforcement.
    So are many cops and corrections officers (especially outsourced corrections officers). Whether you like it or not, TSA is considered members of law enforcement and HLS, just like the Border Patrol.

  12. #92
    JJ78 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The Beach
    Posts
    1,524
    So are many cops and corrections officers (especially outsourced corrections officers). Whether you like it or not, TSA is considered members of law enforcement and HLS, just like the Border Patrol.[/QUOTE]

    Damn, BgMc we agree on something. There is hope after all. i think you are coming around brother.

  13. #93
    BgMc31's Avatar
    BgMc31 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Vegas, bitches!!!
    Posts
    3,855
    ^^^HOLY SHIT!!! ARMAGEDDON IS UPON US!!!!! Hahahahahahahahha!

  14. #94
    JJ78 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The Beach
    Posts
    1,524
    I know, soon you are going to be banging on my door wanting some of my food and water i have stocked up. Im afraid that you will eat it all in one sitting tho.

  15. #95
    lovbyts's Avatar
    lovbyts is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    30,260
    Quote Originally Posted by BgMc31 View Post
    In bold...
    I have noticed on a lot of threads you like to use the term flawed logic. A lot of flawed logic is nothing more than personal opinions. In my view I can see different scenarios than the ones you are stating. Yes in yours it makes sense and I think it does in mine also but no need to get into yet another useless debate over opinions.

    Maybe there is no perfect answer but I think many of the things that are happening are wrong and useless. I'm sure some is just media hype and hopefully this is not the norm but the exception.

  16. #96
    zabster151's Avatar
    zabster151 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    812
    im sorry, but this is a ****ing joke 588 views and 20 votes. what are ppl so scared of just vote.

  17. #97
    zaggahamma's Avatar
    zaggahamma is offline Mr. Moderation
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    19,486
    Quote Originally Posted by zabster151 View Post
    im sorry, but this is a ****ing joke 588 views and 20 votes. what are ppl so scared of just vote.
    i was wondering the same...also wondered if you can vote more than once (not that I would...just sayin)...suprised at the tie actually

  18. #98
    zabster151's Avatar
    zabster151 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    812
    you can only vote once. just don't get it, why ppl are so scared or blind to the vote button.

  19. #99
    zaggahamma's Avatar
    zaggahamma is offline Mr. Moderation
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Orlando
    Posts
    19,486
    quite a few hangin chads i reckon

  20. #100
    JJ78 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The Beach
    Posts
    1,524
    Be careful what you say about the TSA!

    http://www.naturalnews.com/032126_TSA_travelers.html

  21. #101
    terraj's Avatar
    terraj is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    2,280
    Quote Originally Posted by zabster151 View Post
    im sorry, but this is a ****ing joke 588 views and 20 votes. what are ppl so scared of just vote.
    Could it be that most people don't see it as an issue? Or most people on here stay away from your threads?

    I voted.

  22. #102
    zabster151's Avatar
    zabster151 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    812
    if they stayed away from my threads or did not see it as an issue there wouldn't be 588 views,

  23. #103
    terraj's Avatar
    terraj is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    2,280
    In that case^ ^The lack on votes reflect that most people don't see the pat downs as an issue ...

  24. #104
    zabster151's Avatar
    zabster151 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Cali
    Posts
    812
    not trying to Carty this on but they should just vote no then.

  25. #105
    JJ78 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    The Beach
    Posts
    1,524
    Here you go, even your trusted lawmakers in Washington think this infringes on our rights as American Citizens:

    (NaturalNews) Several state legislators are outraged over the US Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) continued and escalating assaults against individual freedom, personal privacy, and even the Constitution itself, through the use of naked body scanners and full-body pat downs. So these lawmakers from Hawaii and several other US states are banding together to form the "United States for Travel Freedom" (USTF) caucus, whose aim is to pass state laws that combat TSA tyranny (http://www.akhealthcaucus.org/TSA.php).

    When Alaska Representative Sharon Cissna, a breast cancer survivor, was recently pulled aside after going through the naked body scanner at a Colorado airport, agents insisted that she also undergo a full-body pat down. TSA agents had detected Cissna's breast implant, which was the result of a mastectomy she underwent, and insisted that she also be felt up by a TSA agent. When she refused, agents would not let her proceed, and instead she had to find an alternate form of travel.

    Similar incidents in other states, including the recent, inappropriate full-body pat down of a six year old girl (http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_...), have been the tipping point for many states that have decided, enough is enough. Thus, legislators in several US states are fighting back against the TSA's gross violation of privacy and freedom by working to pass airport security legislation that bars the TSA from certain invasive protocols.

    In Hawaii, Sen. Sam Slom introduced Senate Bill 1150, "Relating to the use of Body Imaging Scanners at Airports," which would prohibit the use of non-consensual naked body scanners at Hawaii airports. The bill was never given a proper hearing at the time it was introduced, but Sen. Slom has said it will be reintroduced again in 2012.

    In Michigan, Rep. Eileen Kowall introduced the latest version of House Resolution 368 in 2010, which would fully prohibit the use of naked body scanners and full-body pat downs in airports, citing the procedures' explicit constitutional violations.

    Other states with TSA legislation include Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington.

    Sources for this story include:

    http://www.hawaiireporter.com/hawai...

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/032122_TS...#ixzz1K68xjYNB

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •