-
09-07-2005, 03:12 PM #1
Deca And Sust Fake Or Legit
what do u think
Last edited by romeo469; 09-13-2005 at 12:07 PM.
-
09-07-2005, 05:33 PM #2
think about what ?? Any picture will be helpful ...
-
09-07-2005, 05:34 PM #3Originally Posted by MichaelCC
I agree
-
09-08-2005, 09:43 AM #4Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 75
yes legit, thx to ur very good pictures with their great detail its clear that theyre not fake
dude lol WTF how do u expect us to be able to answer a question like that
-
09-09-2005, 10:40 PM #5
sry but im trying to get the pictures to work
-
09-09-2005, 11:01 PM #6
i cant the pictures to work it keeps saying there to big
-
09-09-2005, 11:24 PM #7
i think thats it
Last edited by romeo469; 09-09-2005 at 11:54 PM.
-
09-09-2005, 11:53 PM #8
pics are way to blurry bro
-
09-10-2005, 12:22 AM #9
try again sry guys
deca norma
sus 250Last edited by romeo469; 09-12-2005 at 01:39 PM.
-
09-10-2005, 06:50 AM #10
Way too blurry bro. Can't tell a thing.
-
09-10-2005, 10:15 PM #11
Take some pics a bit further away. I have a feeling that Norma is fake.
-
09-11-2005, 02:22 PM #12
blurry pictures - try to take better pics, bro.
I agree with PowerBB - norma looks strange to me too. Don't forget to take "top picture" of your norma.
-
09-11-2005, 02:27 PM #13
Use the Macro function on your camera. It looks like a Flower.
-
09-11-2005, 02:31 PM #14
yes- makro is better way to take good quality pictures from short distance - also don't forget to fixate your camera.
-
09-12-2005, 05:27 AM #15
I hope you haven't get another Croatian "Greek" Norma Deca , a
better pic would help alot, we are willing to tell you the truth, bro!
-
09-12-2005, 01:34 PM #16Originally Posted by Seajackal
-
09-12-2005, 03:46 PM #17
Norma Pics
-
09-12-2005, 03:47 PM #18
Your tops look a bit different Romeo469, It can also be a bad pic.
-
09-12-2005, 06:11 PM #19
do you know if the sust is real....cause the deca looks exactly the same as urs
probodybuilder
-
09-13-2005, 04:55 AM #20
Romeo, your Decas a re fakes cuz they messed up with the Batch# date
codings cuz they look to be red logo Normas and they should be 04XXXXX
batch# but they are 01XXXX instead! Did I miss something? Tell me if your
sust have batch# and exp dates printed in dot matrix black collored or not
cuz if they don't they are a very well done fake, from a first glance they
look good by the neck collar, that will deppend only on your answer to
the batch# exp date. Sorry for your loss on your decas bro!
PS the crimps in your decas look very poorly done so that's why PowerBB
said that they are bad IMO, you could tell they are fake just from that!
Correction: where I wrote 04XXXX I should have writen 05XXXXX because
your stuff is supposed to be good till 2007 as Normas are good for 2 years.
My bad again....Last edited by Seajackal; 09-14-2005 at 03:27 AM.
-
09-13-2005, 05:02 AM #21Originally Posted by Seajackal
-
09-13-2005, 05:15 AM #22
I have to agree with PowerBB and SJ - something's wrong with your Norma deca . Maybe it's just because of picture quanlity - who knows.
For comparison, there are more pictures - some of them are from closer distance, so you can see the details PowerBB and SJ were talking about (red NORMA logo, Batch, aluminium top, ...):
http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51461
http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51462
http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51463
http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51464
http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51465
http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51477
http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51479
http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51480
-
09-13-2005, 05:20 AM #23
re
Originally Posted by romeo469
-
09-13-2005, 05:21 AM #24
re
Originally Posted by romeo469Last edited by Maryland-Mcl-Machine; 09-13-2005 at 05:45 AM.
-
09-13-2005, 05:31 AM #25
romeo469 - now you have some much perfect pictures to compare it with you deca , that you cannot miss any detail ...
-
09-13-2005, 11:48 AM #26
Did you remove the crimp (stopper seal) or was it like that when you got it? If the're no crimp, chances are, it's been tampered with.
-
09-13-2005, 12:04 PM #27Originally Posted by jmt
cause if they are fake im gonna snap my suppliers neck in 2Last edited by romeo469; 09-13-2005 at 12:16 PM.
-
09-13-2005, 12:23 PM #28Originally Posted by Seajackal
HERES A BOTTLE OF MARYLAND MCI MACHINES DECA HES SAYS ITS REAL BUT ITS NO 04XXXXX
LOOKLast edited by romeo469; 09-13-2005 at 12:26 PM.
-
09-13-2005, 02:28 PM #29
re
Originally Posted by romeo469
just or you to know i colect them directly from pharmacy in greece and i have post the old box and the new box of deca those pics ware sent to BOF to chek legit and they went ok.
-
09-13-2005, 02:36 PM #30
re
Norma lot# 0403024 test results
-
09-13-2005, 05:03 PM #31
-
09-14-2005, 03:36 AM #32
Romeo, your Decas are deffinitly fakes why bother posting more pics?
Maryland's Normas are real deals the batch number has something with
the year of production and month as well I mean if one have been made
in 2004 June for example THEN it must be 0406XXX if it was made in
July 2005 THEN its batch is 0507XXX take the first 2 digits and add 2
years THEN you will get the expiry date for example 0406XXX is good
till 2006 06, so MMM's decas are spot on in this code bro but not yours!
I'm really sorry for the loss. The Sust looks real for me. Oh, just grab
your source's neck and get your money back! It rhymed huh?
-
09-14-2005, 11:29 AM #33
So These Are Fake Because Of Of The Date And Batch # Right Cause I Want To Make Sure I Know So I Can Say It To My Supplier
-
09-15-2005, 05:00 AM #34
Bro, just tell him that the crimps just looked shity, nothing to do with real
Normas, plus the batch/exp date doesn't match to the real ones, just don't
comment to him about the coding cuz he will probably contact the fakers
and they will work things over this detail making spoting those fakes a little
more difficult, but not for us over here, hehe! Kick his ass in my name bro!
PS: the "E" letters look wrong, and the rubber stopper looks grey, when it
should be black.Last edited by Seajackal; 09-15-2005 at 05:03 AM.
-
10-03-2005, 11:14 PM #35New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 1
any further information
on this lot number and expiry for the greek deca
13292
07 2007
as pictured by romeo?
look good expect for the lot as pointed out...
just curious
-
10-04-2005, 04:39 AM #36Originally Posted by atyomommas
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS