Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Madscientist is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    4

    Real or Fake Testabol 400?

    Just wondering if anyone can confirm if this is real or fake? Dates on bottle are printed in blue ink and reads
    Manufactured: 05.2010
    Use by date: 05.2015
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Real or Fake Testabol 400?-img_0360.jpg   Real or Fake Testabol 400?-img_0357.jpg  

  2. #2
    gixxerboy1's Avatar
    gixxerboy1 is offline ~VET~ Extraordinaire~
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    32,802
    that company is not in business anymore. its now a ugl that people copied the name.

    Its probably test but doubt whats on the label

  3. #3
    methan is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    385
    this stuff is no longer manufactured, imo quite risky choice to buy these

  4. #4
    Madscientist is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    4
    Yeah I was thinking the same. I think I'll source out something different. Thanks for your opinions.

  5. #5
    methan is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    385
    go for new version of bd if u want this brand

  6. #6
    Sheven is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    losing the plot,remember?
    Posts
    916
    Why would you use a brand that is a total replica of a old brand that doesn't exist any more, they try to "replica" a product that never existed. Is like a copy-car of BMW makes BMW 9000 cc3 motor.

  7. #7
    gixxerboy1's Avatar
    gixxerboy1 is offline ~VET~ Extraordinaire~
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    32,802
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheven View Post
    Why would you use a brand that is a total replica of a old brand that doesn't exist any more, they try to "replica" a product that never existed. Is like a copy-car of BMW makes BMW 9000 cc3 motor.
    I'm not recommending them. But why not its not different then any other ugl.
    They arent replication a product. BD didnt have anything unique. They are using the name for marking reasons.
    This isnt the only brand that has happened with

  8. #8
    Sheven is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    losing the plot,remember?
    Posts
    916
    Quote Originally Posted by gixxerboy1 View Post
    I'm not recommending them. But why not its not different then any other ugl.
    They arent replication a product. BD didnt have anything unique. They are using the name for marking reasons.
    This isnt the only brand that has happened with
    I prefer to buy a new brand that gives me some sense of safety than to buy a BAD replica. I surely give more credit to someone that made the effort to make a new brand and take the trouble to give some sense of safety.

  9. #9
    methan is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    385
    Quote Originally Posted by Sheven View Post
    I prefer to buy a new brand that gives me some sense of safety than to buy a BAD replica.
    I m totally agreed with u.

  10. #10
    gixxerboy1's Avatar
    gixxerboy1 is offline ~VET~ Extraordinaire~
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    32,802
    the only thing that is a replica is the label.
    What is the difference of the name or label if what is in the vial is good.

  11. #11
    SumJJ is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1
    So i have this same stuff to.. whats the verdict? is it fake and untrustworthy or should i go for it... never injected anything before so im a lil worried.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •