Results 1 to 40 of 43
Thread: sam byrd squats a 1003 at 198lbs
-
08-28-2006, 12:03 PM #1
sam byrd squats a 1003 at 198lbs
sick squat,thereis a video at http://www.powerliftingwatch.com/
does he break parallel??i am not sure, but i will say this. looks a lot beter than thesquats mike miller gets away with!he does half squats.
kierian kidder pres of the WPO recently stated in so many words that heis organization wouldnt take a BIG lift away from a lifter because they didnt break paralell. people crowd want to see big squats and big numbers
IMO the squat BLOWS!!!it is SO subjective, the rules change from organizations so much, and peoples definition of what paralell is is always an argument, there are 2 real lifts left, press and deadlift, the squat is a dying movement.i is bd enough that the whole sport has been tainted with this 3ply equipment giving everyone crazy numbers in the press and the squat,but now,besides that, the rules are being applied loosely so lifters can get even bigger numbers!!you have to draw a line somewhere. what next, 6 ply equipment and quartrer squats will be counted as good lifts?!?!?come fckn on!!!
any way, not to take anything from sam , the lift looks alot beter than most, congrats on the lift
-
08-28-2006, 12:06 PM #2
on a side note, power lifting watch is a great site to get up to date info and all meet information for EVERY organization!!!2 thumbs up!
-
08-28-2006, 12:43 PM #3
Where exactly on their site is that video?
Edit: Found it; it looks pretty close to parallel to me, but you can't really tell from the video.Last edited by Dangerdan; 08-28-2006 at 12:47 PM.
-
-
08-28-2006, 12:52 PM #5
great site. Looked at some videos of a chick called kara bonigham some of her lifts were huge.
-
08-28-2006, 03:11 PM #6Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA
- Posts
- 377
I was thinking about moving to the APF to compete with guys like Byrd and I think Weech is in there also. I'll probably sit out of competition for a year or two just to concentrate on my lockouts.
It's funny when I see a guy like Byrd (who is 23-24) and I think to myself, "I can compete with him." But then I realize he' a hundred pounds lighter than me and I have to give the guy props because he is the coan/vogelpohl of the future. Damn is he strong for his size and in general.
-
08-29-2006, 02:49 PM #7
what do you gent think? did he break paralell?
-
08-29-2006, 02:50 PM #8Originally Posted by perfectbeast2001
-
08-29-2006, 02:51 PM #9Originally Posted by Velkar182
-
08-29-2006, 03:22 PM #10Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA
- Posts
- 377
It is almost impossible to see whether he is deep enough or not. The video only captures the essence.
-
08-30-2006, 07:09 AM #11
dam good lift any way you look at it
-
08-30-2006, 09:20 AM #12Originally Posted by Velkar182
-
08-30-2006, 10:29 AM #13
1003 nicee... i read the newest PL USA and there was a picture of Sam Byrd at NERB and it said his best squat was 705... ?? so he gets close to 300lbs out of a suit and wraps??
-
08-30-2006, 01:00 PM #14Originally Posted by Squatman51
-
08-30-2006, 03:09 PM #15Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA
- Posts
- 377
It is a certainty that when we say powerlifting we are speaking broadly about a couple of sports that were once united. WPO powerlifting is about lockout strength while powerlifting used to mean that an individual could squat with or without clothes on and it would make no difference. These are obviously two different sports. Two of many that we call powerlifting.
-
08-30-2006, 06:42 PM #16Originally Posted by Doc.Sust
-
08-30-2006, 07:04 PM #17Originally Posted by Squatman51
-
09-03-2006, 05:05 PM #18
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...84427006412318
Here's for the guys who were wondering if Sam broke parallel or not.
-
09-04-2006, 12:06 PM #19Originally Posted by DARKSEID
-
09-04-2006, 10:40 PM #20
The three lift shot wasn't working on my pc. I only saw the one you posted that was taken far out with people obstructing the view. My bad.
Last edited by DARKSEID; 09-04-2006 at 10:44 PM. Reason: change
-
09-05-2006, 03:50 PM #21Originally Posted by DARKSEID
-
09-09-2006, 10:40 PM #22New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Great N.W. U.S.A
- Posts
- 22
It seem like you get white lights for getting to paralle, yet in the past you had to go below parallel. The advancement of gear are pushing the weight up very fast. I guess this will ultimately smash the records of the past. I don't know if this is good or bad.
-
09-10-2006, 11:03 AM #23Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA
- Posts
- 377
Gear or no gear, juice or no juice, If you don't go parallel or slightly below, each white light is a kick in the face of Ed Coan, Captain Kirk, Anthony Clark, Kaz...................everyone who set any kind of record at anytime!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
09-10-2006, 04:24 PM #24New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Great N.W. U.S.A
- Posts
- 22
I totally agree with the above. It is taking away from the lifters of the past..
-
09-11-2006, 12:22 PM #25Originally Posted by suns
-
09-11-2006, 04:41 PM #26New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Great N.W. U.S.A
- Posts
- 22
i can understand that the sport is just wanting to grow and become more popular so that maybe the top lifter can make a living and get paid . People want to see big lifts and get exited when it happens. So i guess this is why maybe some lifts get passed know that wouldn't have 10yrs. ago. I dont think most lifter will be okay with this, if i were to leave the platform i would want to feel confident my lift was good with out any question. Yes, i call bullshite on this as well. It makes a 600+ bench by ed coan look like nothing when everyone with a double denim is belly benching this. I have my reservation about gettin a bench shirt. I think i will start our with single ply. I feel it should be for support and safety like a knee wrap. More layers and denim go beyond safety and into aiding the lifter for extra weight.
-
09-13-2006, 12:00 PM #27
what organization do you want to compete in? if you lan on doing drug fre work and single ply go to the usapl. if you plan on going drug full, get the multi ply equip and go to the apf or ipa. you have to get the equipment that the people in your organiztion use to keep it fair, would work very welll if you took single ply equipment to a multi ply federation and got waffled. or if you took multi ply equip to a single ply fed and they wouldnt allow it
-
09-14-2006, 01:32 PM #28New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Great N.W. U.S.A
- Posts
- 22
I do like apf it looks like it would be alot of fun. I will eventually use AS, probalby sooner than i think actually. As far as gear goes i think i will start with single ply and then move my way up to double and maybe eventualy denim. I guess i would like to make a natural progression instead of just jumping right to double denim. I would like to train for maybe a year of so until i complete. have only been lifting again for like 3 months. Trying to dedicate myself and give it a realy go once in for all in my life. I think i read on this forum that competing in the afp withoug AS is like going to gun fight with a butter nife. I thought this was funny LMAO.
-
09-14-2006, 04:09 PM #29Originally Posted by suns
-
09-15-2006, 03:36 PM #30Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA
- Posts
- 377
The other thing is that by jumping up layers of suits quickly and materials, your lockout must be greater for each upgrade. If a guy benched 185 and can lockout 255, there is no way in hell they should try to work with a triple denim. The bar would never come close to touching and it would be a waste. Suited PLing requires a lot of lockout work in order to make good use of the suits.
-
09-15-2006, 06:08 PM #31
I say this is parallel anyday. GOOD SQUAT !
-
09-16-2006, 07:05 PM #32Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA
- Posts
- 377
JEEZ LOUISE! That is parallel. I like seeing guys "just break parallel" for it to be a good lift, but parallel is a minimum requirement (should be anyways). Great lift!!!!
-
09-16-2006, 10:59 PM #33New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Great N.W. U.S.A
- Posts
- 22
Its their i guess, but if that my depth i am not happy with myself. all depends on oganization, squat style, ect. ect. camera angle and stuff. all in all big lift good enough for white lights. awesome BW to weight ratio!!!
-
09-17-2006, 08:05 AM #34
I can do 1003 quarter squats raw!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lol, yea not too impressive i know
-
09-17-2006, 08:08 AM #35
Im convinced guys in the 181 and 198 are the strongest per weight. they can just pack alot of punch.
-
09-17-2006, 11:16 AM #36New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Great N.W. U.S.A
- Posts
- 22
i love giggly giggly mike.
-
10-04-2006, 08:31 PM #37
I lifted highschool in Alabama...breaking parallel was a must...
HIGHSCHOOL, that's funny right?
ALSO LIKE THE LITTLE CLIP
-
10-05-2006, 02:18 PM #38Originally Posted by BNK
-
10-05-2006, 02:20 PM #39Originally Posted by powerliftmike
-
10-07-2006, 05:18 PM #40Originally Posted by Doc.Sust
im with you on the subjectiveness of the squat in PL. If it were up to me Id throw it out and put in rock bottom raw front squat instead, just like olympic lifting. which is my favorite.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS