Results 1 to 40 of 57
-
03-11-2006, 11:19 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 48
i'd rather be built like these guys from before the 1950's
You Guys can have the new look withs it's bloated puffyness,i'll take to look of the old timers like the following:
GEORGE HACKENSCHMIDT
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Hackenschmidt
or Eugen Sandow
http://www.sandowplus.co.uk/sandow3.jpg
http://www.sandowplus.co.uk/sandow2.jpg
-
03-11-2006, 11:23 PM #2
good luck to u. the 1st guy looks fat 2 me.
-
03-12-2006, 08:35 AM #3Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 351
Ill take my hat off to him. That pic was taken in 1903!!!!!!! He doesnt look fat at all.........He probably looks better than 80% of the guys on this board. Awesome achievment considering he was born in 1878! Back then they didnt know anything.......no diets, no supplements, no steroids .
-
03-12-2006, 09:01 AM #4
Yeah thats pretty amazing to have a body like that around early 1900's .
-
03-12-2006, 11:18 AM #5New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 48
Originally Posted by Jnrmrplymouth
-
03-12-2006, 11:24 AM #6New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 48
Originally Posted by jax larue
-
03-12-2006, 11:27 AM #7New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 48
Originally Posted by Jnrmrplymouth
I also know that the vast majority of them,was against smoking,drinking and the use of drugs(yes they had drug use backthen too,it justwasn't as many doing drugs then as now),and i believe they'd be appaled at the thought of roid's being used.
-
03-12-2006, 11:34 AM #8
He doesn't look that great bro jmo.
-
03-12-2006, 11:44 AM #9New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 48
Originally Posted by Jnrmrplymouth
it'sjust that as for as training methods gowe are really so far behind them it's
pathetic.
Now before you stone me let me explain:
1)sure there where trainers and books on weight lifting back then,but everything was done and written in a way that anyone could understand it
and could get great results,i'll explain in the second point now.
2)Science has gotten intoand since then basically ruindedworking out on weights,beacsue their constantly changing their stnace on just what makes a muscle grow,and howmany reps it takes to make a muscle grow,one minite itslow repsthey say,the next it's high reps.
true the old timeers didn't science back then saying this amount of reps works that one doesn't,which is a good thing because they used all sorts of rep and set schemes,some 1per,some 5 some 10,etc same with the sets1 ,2 some times 3 or 4.
also scienceissaying don't squat,dead liftor press behind the neck,and in the place of those exercises they tout isolation exercises.the old times did mostly the vary exercises that science is saying not to do.
so you can see why there's so much confusionamong people just starting out
as to sets,reps,and types of exercises to do.
3)also because ofscience getting into bodybuilding and them saying that you shouldn'tsocertian exercises because their dangerous,the strength levels of todays bodybuilders are nothing like thoseof the old timers.
Ask yourself,how may of todays gouys could do a 157 pound one arm militarypress with a barbell?
remeber bodybuilding dealswith people not a set of equations and chemical formulas so its not a science but an art.
ok i'll get off my soap box now guys.
-
03-12-2006, 11:45 AM #10New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 48
Originally Posted by ManWhore
yeh i suposeyou'd rather have the puffy look like they have today
-
03-12-2006, 11:47 AM #11Originally Posted by jax larue
If thats what they call it, YES.
-
03-12-2006, 11:52 AM #12New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 48
Originally Posted by ManWhore
1)water retention from steroid use ,and they lookthat way even when ripped.
2)training for size instead of sterngth and size.
Soimyself willtake the older look it's fuctional.
-
03-13-2006, 06:35 AM #13
i wouldnt describe bodybuilders of today as puffy
freakish yes
puffy no
how can dexter jackson or victor martinez be descibed as puffy
-
03-13-2006, 10:59 AM #14New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 48
Originally Posted by G-Force
I'm talking about the guys that are bigger then dexter jackson.
-
03-13-2006, 11:00 AM #15New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 48
Originally Posted by jax larue
oh yeh and another way youcan tellif their doing roid's is they looklike their pregnant because of the distended abs
-
03-25-2006, 01:02 PM #16Originally Posted by jax larue
-
03-25-2006, 09:51 PM #17Originally Posted by jax larue
-
03-26-2006, 06:39 AM #18Associate Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2004
- Location
- Chitown
- Posts
- 348
Originally Posted by jax larue
-
07-18-2006, 09:23 AM #19New Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 4
I want the sox from the 1st guy
-
07-18-2006, 09:30 AM #20VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
I'd rather (and will) look like Flex Wheeler or Chris Cormier. Preferably at their 99 Mr.O condition.
Those old school dudes looked GREAT for their time, no doubt about it.
-
07-18-2006, 10:43 AM #21
1st guy sucks
-
07-18-2006, 11:06 AM #22
1st guy's got some pretty good legs, ESPECIALLY for 1903! I would take Lee Priests look @ my height, though!
-
08-30-2006, 10:26 PM #23Junior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 75
Originally Posted by jax larue
-
08-30-2006, 10:40 PM #24Originally Posted by l Viruz l
-
08-30-2006, 10:47 PM #25
Guy looks fat....U all are crazy.
To bad he's not taking gram after gram of shit into his system.....
Just because he's not anerexic with a sixpack or jacked on hormones makes him "fat".
-
08-30-2006, 11:43 PM #26Originally Posted by jax larue
-
08-30-2006, 11:51 PM #27Originally Posted by zodiac666
-
08-31-2006, 06:13 AM #28Originally Posted by jax larue
-
08-31-2006, 11:50 AM #29
Here's a great page which shows how some of the older guys match up with todays mass-monsters.
http://ironage.us/virtual/virtual7.html
-
08-31-2006, 11:51 AM #30
Personally, I think I would rather look like Frank Zane.
-
08-31-2006, 01:56 PM #31Originally Posted by Dangerdan
LOL nice link.
THat frank zane & markus ruhl comparison is priceless!
-
08-31-2006, 02:24 PM #32
Yeah, I think Ruhl probably has him on mass. . .
-
09-01-2006, 12:29 PM #33
BBWWWHAHAHHAAHAHAHHA!
Muscle Asylum Project Athlete
-
09-01-2006, 09:55 PM #34Originally Posted by Hellmask
-
09-04-2006, 12:45 PM #35New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 26
Originally Posted by jax larue
-
09-06-2006, 12:34 AM #36VET Retired
- Join Date
- Dec 2001
- Location
- barbados
- Posts
- 6,251
Originally Posted by aclg
-
09-06-2006, 03:33 AM #37Originally Posted by aclg
-
09-06-2006, 03:56 AM #38Originally Posted by hardgainer12
-
09-06-2006, 04:53 PM #39Originally Posted by aclg
I would actually have a ton of respect for sombody who walks into a gym like that!
-
09-06-2006, 07:33 PM #40Originally Posted by jax larue
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Tren Cycle (blast)
01-06-2025, 11:29 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS