Coming from you, that's a redundant statement!! Lmao, jk bro.
Damn, that sucks dude... sorry to hear that
I'm not surprised!
now, i have a grip on nutrition and how it works but i now think the whole protein intake thing is BS to a certain degree and has been 'broscienced' around by the supplement companies.
IMO, alot of guys have their protein WAY too high. I tend to agree with you as to why they believe it needs to be that way... so many follow supplement ads and what not in the magazines, it's no wonder.
I don't know if he wants his personal information divulged by me, but let's just say a very well respected Vet and undoubtedly one of the smartest guys on this board is around 5'9 and has been upwards of 220lbs at < 10% bodyfat - and has admitted he's never had his protein intake higher than 250g. I believe that was the number, if not it was something in that ballpark.
My point here is that you look at a guy who can achieve and maintain his stats at 250g protein OR LESS.... and then look at these 150lb supposed 'hard gainers' who are at 400 + grams/day, and you have to start to wonder what the real issue is, because it's HIGHLY unlikely to be an issue with insufficient protein intake.
So many people trying to add mass look at protein only and fail to see the essential role carbs play. I've seen 'bulking' diet macro splits at 50/30/20 (P/C/F) which is just asinine to me. In most cases i'd have carbs make up the majority of a bulking diet.
The only time i'd consider increasing my protein macro is with a strict cutting diet entailing a fairly severe caloric deficit. Since calories will be relatively low, we can assume the energy macros (carbs and fat) that make them up are also low, therefore we want to ensure we spare LBM by increasing protein. This simply isn't necessary on a higher calorie diet, as carbs and fat themselves have protein sparing properties.
Generally speaking though, my protein and fat macros remain pretty consistent, and carbs are all that really changes depending on the current goal at hand.