Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    adam15425 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Pa
    Posts
    181

  2. #2
    endus is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    242
    Yikes - did the article from Ergo said 150mg per ml for Ar-r S4????????

    That means people that were taking 100 mg was actually taking 300mg (packaging says 50mg/ml). Thats not good

    Ar-r did mentioned that it was over filled to make sure it wasn't underdosed, but this is way beyond overfilled.

    Edit - I wonder if this might be possible cause for suppression? I believe Bass got one of the earlier ones, maybe his wasn't dosed like one mentioned on this article. I'm just conjecturing here.
    Last edited by endus; 01-18-2010 at 12:29 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    pre-med
    Posts
    793
    Blog Entries
    2


    This is very suspect... The ergo-log article says that this was regarding RUI-Prodcuts (AR-R ) sarms ...but that doesn't seem to be the case..

    In the German study performed by Mario Thevis, he purchased SARMs S4 online, but not from RUI-Products...when you look at the full article published by Thevis, he doesn't once reference where he purchased his SARMs from. The article did say, "one unit (30mL) was purchased online and delivered in a box labelled as containing face moisturizer and green tea extract."

    Here is a link to the FULL TEXT of the study by Mario Thevis, and below that is a link to the full PDF verions:

    http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/c...4942/HTMLSTART
    http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/c...14942/PDFSTART


    I don't know about you, but i've never received anything from ar-r in a box labelled face moisturizer or green tea extract.

  4. #4
    bass's Avatar
    bass is offline HRT Specialist ~ Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In Southern Commiefornia
    Posts
    9,332
    me too, nothing was labeled as face moisturizer or green tea extract. there was a misprint on ARR S4 when it was first listed on their website, its was 3mg/mL, but immediately Lion pulled the product off the shelf until got the correct labels. i received two different batches from ARR, the first one tasted like shark oil as some have described, and it separated especially toward the end, but got all the sides we normally get from S4. then the second batch was different, perhaps too strong because i felt the effects more, and it didn't separate like the first batch. it also tasted different, the second batch tasted like fiberglass glue...

    SARMs Liquid S4 UPDATE

  5. #5
    lifterjaydawg is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,603
    yea just read it and they never mention who they actually bought it from, and lion always has the same packaging, would never dome like that, this is definitely from someone else.

  6. #6
    toothache's Avatar
    toothache is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,220
    Quote Originally Posted by mister.fantastic View Post
    This is very suspect... The ergo-log article says that this was regarding RUI-Prodcuts (AR-R ) sarms ...but that doesn't seem to be the case..

    In the German study performed by Mario Thevis, he purchased SARMs S4 online, but not from RUI-Products...when you look at the full article published by Thevis, he doesn't once reference where he purchased his SARMs from. The article did say, "one unit (30mL) was purchased online and delivered in a box labelled as containing face moisturizer and green tea extract."

    Here is a link to the FULL TEXT of the study by Mario Thevis, and below that is a link to the full PDF verions:

    http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/c...4942/HTMLSTART
    http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/c...14942/PDFSTART


    I don't know about you, but i've never received anything from ar-r in a box labelled face moisturizer or green tea extract.
    After reading the study by Mario Thevis, he never mentions rui which makes that ergo log complete crap.

    And all the products that I've gotten from arr never was labeled face moisturizer or tea extract.

    Thanks Mr. Fantastic for that study and clearing this up.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •