Running a SARM for LONG TIME

[Whacked]

Say 50 mg for 6 months for example.

Any concerns for long term or permanent visual issues?

[tballz]

No idea about that one. I personally wouldn't do over 2 months on the sarms.

[bass]

i did 6 weeks and couldn't take anymore! 6 months is insane!

[Big]

trouble is, sarms have not been available to the public for a long time, so no one could really say what the long term effects are.

[sprinter911]

I have looked into SARMs and researched it quite a bit. I would NOT recommend 6 months. Very excessive. After reading about it I decided not even to try it. The vision sides don't appeal to me. There are some good threads with SARMs logs in the SARMs section. Check them out if you haven't had the opportunity. You may think twice about them.

[Whacked]

Because of the eye sides?

i did 6 weeks and couldn't take anymore! 6 months is insane!

[Whacked]

I feel ya but wsnt that the intended purpose of this stuff? To replace testosterone in HRT?

trouble is, sarms have not been available to the public for a long time, so no one could really say what the long term effects are.

[the big 1]

I feel ya but wsnt that the intended purpose of this stuff? To replace testosterone in HRT?

yes your right

but the intended dosage for HRT is 3mgs !!!!

and most people are chugging down at least 50mgs !!!!

i doubt the vision sides are present at that low dosage (3mgs) but over extended periods who knows ???

also the effect of any anabolic is sure to platue at that stage IMO (6 months), not to mention the cost of doing sarms that long !!!

[Whacked]

Good insight buddy. Thanks

[carver56]

WHACKED:

Nobody has ever tried this before. Keep it in short cycles only!

[skeldno]

I will do six months as a guini pig if you want?

[stevey_6t9]

I will do six months as a guini pig if you want?

please do.

[toothache]

I will do six months as a guini pig if you want?

Seriously?

[bass]

Because of the eye sides?

Yes!