Bloodworkresults 6 weeks in sarmsstack
week 1-3 100 mg superlaxo
week 1-6; 25 mg ostarine
week 2-6; 17,5 mg mk677
week 2-6; 20 mg SR9009
week 6 RAD140 10 mg
Bloodpressure 128/80 (lowest ever). Heartbeat at rest 55 (before 75).
FSH; 2,2 (0,7-11,1) LH; 4,7 (0,8-7,6)
Testosteron, well, they send it next week. Damned, i was looking forward to that one, but i guess its not that bad as the LH is good.
E2; <40 (20-130)
GFR (kidneys) 66 (100-140) Thats bad but i also had 66 last summer. Didnt think much of it then. Maybe its ok because my creatinin is often out of range due to much more muscles than average. But, i need to call my doc on that one. But it doesn relate to the sarmsstack cause the value was the same as last summer when i was natural.
Creatinin; 115 (60-105)
HDL-cholestrol; 0,52 (0,8-2,10) Disapointing, ok it was 0,38 before christmas but then i was cycling + lgd. Last summer 2 months after gear it was 0,77. I guess my natural hdl is low, and the ostarine made it lower, but the disapointment is that i was hoping the sr9009 would be good for hdl. Possible it could have been lower without it, but i doubt it.
HB ok, PSA ok, 0,8 (0,0-2,7), strange, im peeing 3-4 times each nigth.
Total cholestrol 5,8 (3,3-6,9), on cycle before christmas it was 7,4, but last summer off everything 3,9.
LDL-cholestrol; 4,3 (1,4-4,7), 6,3 before christmas, 2,7 last summer. I can live with that, but no supereffect from sr9009 as i was hoping for.
Prolactin 290 (86-324) Finally ok, i was strugling with prolactin all 2015. Used deca last christmas and summer without DA.
ASAT; 83 (35-105)
ALAT; 51 (10-70) 91 before christmas, ok, this sarmsstack is not harsh on the liver.
Thankful if anyone can fill me in on GFR. Is it normal that bodybuilders have a low GFR as they often tend to be a little high in creatinin, or is it a kidneydamage warning as the rangevalue indicates? I red on a medicalsite that abnormalities, psyko vegan diett or wrong musclesize could mess up this value. But this is important, liverdamage can be healed, kidneys are very hard to repair.
I know they cannot deceide GFR from a standard blood test. They have to calculate from the formula; Man and creatinin >80: 141 × [kreatinin / (0,9 × 88,4)]–1,209 × 0,993age = eGFR, meaning estimated GFR. But my maths knowledge is not was it used to be. I cant even see if a high creatinin makes a low eGFR in that equation, but it doesnt look like that.
