Can I use SARMs when im 18?

[gangen]

I know a guy who knows a lot about SARMS and he recommended this cycle to me,

Ostarine 25 mg ED - 8 weeks
GW-501516 20 mg ED - 12 weeks
MK-677 30 mg ED - 12 weeks

And also said i won't need any PCT, is this a good cycle for a lean bulk? And will i not need any PCT. Also what is your take on the fact that i am 18 years old? I know anabolics will shut me down so im not doing that for at least a few years, but i heard SARMS are a better safer alternative.

[Mr.BB]

I know a guy who knows a lot about SARMS and he recommended this cycle to me,

Ostarine 25 mg ED - 8 weeks
GW-501516 20 mg ED - 12 weeks
MK-677 30 mg ED - 12 weeks

And also said i won't need any PCT, is this a good cycle for a lean bulk? And will i not need any PCT. Also what is your take on the fact that i am 18 years old? I know anabolics will shut me down so im not doing that for at least a few years, but i heard SARMS are a better safer alternative.

About Ostarine read this: http://forums.steroid.com/sarms-sele...ml#post7180243

GW-501516 is useless for muscle building, and personally I would say for anything.

MK-677 is long acting ghrelin, which has been around since 90's, and never made it into the medical community. Long acting GHrelin block normal pulsatile GH waves, GH basically "drips" at constant rate. This pattern is not normal in male humans, and can produce neurological problems due to the chronic stress of constant release of GH, i.e. panic attacks, depression, unfounded fears.

Bottom line, ostarine is as bad as using steroids with added bad side effects. MK-677 the objective is to raise your GH, which at your age are at peak production, messing it up might not return to what was before, adding an array of side effects.

[kelkel]

I know a guy

And that is how it starts.....


Listen to BB. You're 18. Your hormones are peaked. You need nothing else other than great nutrition, hard training and motivation to succeed.

[Ashop]

Absolutely not!! Some of the SARMS are just as suppressive,,if not more so,,,than most anabolic steroids.
As kelkel mentioned,,at your age all you need is : DEDICATION,TRAINING,DIET and REST
Take advantage of your own natural hormones while they are still high.

[AR's King Silabolin]

About Ostarine read this: http://forums.steroid.com/sarms-sele...ml#post7180243

GW-501516 is useless for muscle building, and personally I would say for anything.

MK-677 is long acting ghrelin, which has been around since 90's, and never made it into the medical community. Long acting GHrelin block normal pulsatile GH waves, GH basically "drips" at constant rate. This pattern is not normal in male humans, and can produce neurological problems due to the chronic stress of constant release of GH, i.e. panic attacks, depression, unfounded fears.

Bottom line, ostarine is as bad as using steroids with added bad side effects. MK-677 the objective is to raise your GH, which at your age are at peak production, messing it up might not return to what was before, adding an array of side effects.

Bottom line is that the sides which come with mk677 are far less serious than the sides that come with other ghreleasing drugs.

Well, maybe not bottom line. That line is no. No sarms or other rec chemicals before you are 23.

[Mr.BB]

Bottom line is that the sides which come with mk677 are far less serious than the sides that come with other ghreleasing drugs.

Which other gh releasing drugs do you know that have worse side effects?

[AR's King Silabolin]

Which other gh releasing drugs do you know that have worse side effects?

Ipam, lr3, cjc1295 with n without dac, ghrh 2 and 6 or what the fuk their called....everyone.
And igf1 and hgh, which are used 10 years straigth by "many" without noticable sides ( possible heart enlargement though) are lot more dangerous than mk. I guess it would be fair then to say that mk677 is pretty safe.
No..i have no pubmed or reports. Just an interpretation on what ihave red so far.

Only i can think of that is just as harmless is frag but frag benefits are just fatloss so..

[Mr.BB]

Ipam, lr3, cjc1295 with n without dac, ghrh 2 and 6 or what the fuk their called....everyone.
And igf1 and hgh, which are used 10 years straigth by "many" without noticable sides ( possible heart enlargement though) are lot more dangerous than mk. I guess it would be fair then to say that mk677 is pretty safe.
No..i have no pubmed or reports. Just an interpretation on what ihave red so far.

Only i can think of that is just as harmless is frag but frag benefits are just fatloss so..

Dont know which side effects are you talking about. The problem is probably where you read it.