
Originally Posted by
charger69
Well, OK.... since it was revived.
A lot of people refute the cancer thing. Here is my answer to that.
This test is no different than any other test. They used rodents and they used an amount that they would use in any other test. There was significant cancer detected. A company who was expecting on to make huge sums of money for “exercise in a bottle”, cut the cord and said nope- not going there ... too much risk.
Everyone says because it has the C word. Totally not true. I see so many people defending why the results were not valid ( type of mice, age, dosage, etc). I do know 4 people that have taken it and did have cancer. No- there were no links to what caused the cancer. There are t nowadays since it is not that uncommon.
Now, the other side of the coin... there were tests accomplished on people however the above results ended that. None of the people were ever reported with cancer however they never followed up either.
I would like to state that the people that disregard the test results for cancer still take the test results for fat loss from the same rodents. Hmmmmm.
The only test results that I have seen on humans only shows an increase in the bloods ( cholesterol, etc) and no signs of fat loss caused from it.
I have not checked in the last couple of years for studies because I don’t expect any changes.
To close this up. I live in CA and e wry where you go has a sign that there are known carcinogens here. Even at the hospital!!!! WTF??
This is sort of like Covid- it is a personal preference- you are either cautious ( or scared) of it because of the reported results or you say screw it because you don’t feel that they apply to you (health, age, etc).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk