
Originally Posted by
thegodfather
Well reason number one...is that it is in the Constitution that every person has the right to bear arms and protect him/her self.
Reason number two, if you do not allow citizens to carry handguns, only the criminals have them...
Its very easy to be idealistic and think that "the police can always protect you." However, anyone with common sense knows that the police are not everywhere at every time. If this were the case, people would not get robbed, raped, killed, mugged, etc, etc...
Mace or pepper spray? Many reasons this is not adequate. You dont bring a knife to a gun fight. And believe it or not, pepper spray does not work on everyone, especially meth heads and crackheads, sometimes shooting them doesnt even work unless your using a .45 or something similar with alot of stopping power. I just dont understand how any rational thinking citizen can believe that people should not have adequate and EQUAL means to defend themselves. By equal means, I mean why should a person rely on a less effective method like mase/pepper spray when the bad guy is carrying a gun?
Statistics show that conceal and carry lowers crime rates, PERIOD. Crazy people and bad guys will still get guns, whether you let law abiding citizens with clean records posess and carry them or not.
Not to mention, this bringing me to my next point. YOU dont think anyone needs a gun and cant see why they do. But I think that I do. So who are YOU to decide for me?