Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: masteron vs. halotestin for hardness

  1. #1

    masteron vs. halotestin for hardness

    Lookin to specifically add hardness for looks. Have tried both mast and halo with both very similar dissappointing results. Think the mast i took was too low by dosage and the halo was poor quality. Having said that if i was to take just one of those specifically to add hardness and detail which is the more preferable? By the way if i do either would run my mast at 800mg's per week and have a real high quality halo. Thanks for the input and feedback.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    991
    BF%? mast wont show what uve got unless under 14% halo is basically a quick acting oral that has no bearing on hardess, more on streghth.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    13,506
    Quote Originally Posted by Stosh_112 View Post
    BF%? mast wont show what uve got unless under 14% halo is basically a quick acting oral that has no bearing on hardess, more on streghth.
    Actually, it is probably the best pre-contest hardener there is (once you're at 6% BF).

    OP, bear in mind that the hardening effects mostly only last as long as you're using the drug. Once you discontinue it, your body composition alone will determine how you look. So unless you're competing or doing a photo shoot, go with mast (since it can be used much longer than Halotestin).

  4. #4
    Thanks bonaparte, exactly the info i was looking for.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •