Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 42

Thread: EQ - How do you like it?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    94

    EQ - How do you like it?

    Seems a very hit and miss topic

    How do you EQ as a mass builder at say 600-800mg per week for 12 weeks

    In comparison with deca/tren/primo

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Pissing on saluu
    Posts
    5,415
    Eq=lean slow mass
    Test/Deca=Big Mass cycle

    Eat like non-other...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    psss. over here! ;)
    Posts
    539
    Results would differ with each individual. Everyone responds differently to chemicals. EQ might be a good mass builder for one person then be useless for another. All EQ did to me was make me eat like a horse while deca and tren on the other hand blew me up.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,233
    I feel that EQ works great when stacked with a mass builder or two, such as test, tren, or deca. However, i wouldnt use EQ on its own. I like to add 600mg of EQ to my cycles because it really helps with appetite, and I love the freaky veigns it gives me.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    lol im not telling :D
    Posts
    29,198
    eq is completely pointless IMO

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Rising from my Ashes !!
    Posts
    9,717
    Quote Originally Posted by taiboxa
    eq is completely pointless IMO

    YEAH TAI, we know, if it's not TREN, its pointless.....lolol

  7. #7
    what are the advantages? endurance?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    276
    How would it be for recovering from training? Overall healing?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    124
    I actually loved it, loved the pumps and crazyyyy veins.

    Increases RBC, so theoreticaly supposed to help with indurance, but I havnt seen a study to prove that.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    yeah thats me in avvy
    Posts
    5,669
    Eq is so mild you have to be on it for 14 to 16 weeks at a minimum600mgs to even get something out of it IMO.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    yeah thats me in avvy
    Posts
    5,669
    Oh and TAI we know you Hate it.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Down South
    Posts
    3,371
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigmax
    Eq is so mild you have to be on it for 14 to 16 weeks at a minimum600mgs to even get something out of it IMO.
    did u run this dose yourself?? or did you read this and now posting it???

  13. #13
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,919
    IT takes to long to start seeing results with eq, thats if you do see results in the first place, very mild and i prefer to take advantage of the first few weeks of growth of a cycle with the correct compounds and eq doesnt come into play with me.

  14. #14
    + what most people seem to forget: EQ is in fact bad for your lipid profile [not as bad as winni is, but nevertheless]. So for me it is not worth it, too.
    even more so, as i am mostly doing short cycles.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    264
    Quote Originally Posted by Stumbo
    I feel that EQ works great when stacked with a mass builder or two, such as test, tren, or deca. However, i wouldnt use EQ on its own. I like to add 600mg of EQ to my cycles because it really helps with appetite, and I love the freaky veigns it gives me.
    I agree, def will help you eat more while On.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    264
    Quote Originally Posted by Liftnainez
    did u run this dose yourself?? or did you read this and now posting it???
    LOL!!

  17. #17
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,919
    Quote Originally Posted by AleX-69
    + what most people seem to forget: EQ is in fact bad for your lipid profile [not as bad as winni is, but nevertheless]. So for me it is not worth it, too.
    even more so, as i am mostly doing short cycles.
    Thats my man....

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    E London,no SOURCES given
    Posts
    14,957
    well i like it...........
    but then i normally run 14-16 week cycles..........
    doubt if i will use any after this course as im gonna be a student of Marcus nexy year..............
    _____________________

    Remember.............for us to help you you need to help us....................stats and exp.........

    Source checks and Ugl's to be kept to PM's
    dont ask for source checks unless you have 100 posts/and 45 days minimum as a participating member.........

    Booz.. a long-standing member of the AR Police:

    sorry but absolutely no sources will be checked at this present time....

  19. #19
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,919
    Quote Originally Posted by Booz
    well i like it...........
    but then i normally run 14-16 week cycles..........
    doubt if i will use any after this course as im gonna be a student of Marcus nexy year..............
    Finally your coming to the darker side, there is no turning back and trust me the force will be with you my son........

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,222
    Eq sucks... Plain and simple!!

    Even "Primo" which is considdered very mild, gives me much better gains than eq.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    mass
    Posts
    153
    whats with everyone hating EQ...i used to hear nothing but good things about it. Personally I really like EQ. I get nice gains (slow and steady) and get really vascular. Also the only EQ i used was by DEP

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    gettin lucky in kentucky
    Posts
    1,729
    damn! i wonder if i wasted my hard earned money because i just started my cycle which is 750mg cyp with 600mg eq and i'm tossin in 50mg of winny the last 6 weeks. never ran this compound but heard it's somewhat like deca. i guess not. does anybody like eq?

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    264
    On my fifth week, @400mg with test E @500...Not that bad I suppose, I started to see some rounded mucseles, and viegns starts shownig up.I'm getting leaner. But I agree not that much mass

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    nor-cal(yay area)
    Posts
    585
    i've ran EQ before and i'm running it at 600mg a week for 14 weeks with 750mg a week test, and i really like the appetite stimulating attributes, but i'd rather my test be accompanied by something else.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    holland.
    Posts
    2,849
    i like it at 1000mg ew

    -rodge

  26. #26
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,919
    Quote Originally Posted by rodge nl.
    i like it at 1000mg ew

    -rodge
    You mean ED dont you rodge

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    VA - Formerly OH
    Posts
    2,774
    Quote Originally Posted by JAYROD
    damn! i wonder if i wasted my hard earned money because i just started my cycle which is 750mg cyp with 600mg eq and i'm tossin in 50mg of winny the last 6 weeks. never ran this compound but heard it's somewhat like deca. i guess not. does anybody like eq?
    I ran the EXACT same injectable doses of thos compounds for 17 weeks. The only difference is I ran var for the first 6, then Tbol for the rest.

    I didn;t get anything from the EQ until after week 15. All of a sudden during week 15 I looked down and noticed new veins. I don't think it was worth the money I spent on 16 weeks worth. I could have used something more effective and spent less.

  28. #28
    i like EQ. i think people forget that when EQ makes you want to eat MORE that it is good because the best Anabolic steriod is FOOD!!!! Deca has never made me feel hungry like EQ does, but hey to each there own that is why the world has so many drugs for the same results.

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    lol im not telling :D
    Posts
    29,198
    Quote Originally Posted by BigHawk
    i like EQ. i think people forget that when EQ makes you want to eat MORE that it is good because the best Anabolic steriod is FOOD!!!! Deca has never made me feel hungry like EQ does, but hey to each there own that is why the world has so many drugs for the same results.
    show me studies..
    eq at 1200/wk did nothing for my appetite
    let alone 600 and 900/wk

  30. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Quote Originally Posted by taiboxa
    show me studies..
    eq at 1200/wk did nothing for my appetite
    let alone 600 and 900/wk
    All strong androgens make my appetite go through the roof, test prop was bad but proviron was the worst.

  31. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    lol im not telling :D
    Posts
    29,198
    Quote Originally Posted by big k.l.g
    All strong androgens make my appetite go through the roof, test prop was bad but proviron was the worst.
    EQ = Strong Androgen?! ><

  32. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Quote Originally Posted by taiboxa
    EQ = Strong Androgen?! ><
    What i was trying to say is EQ is not needed for this specific reason.

  33. #33
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,919
    Quote Originally Posted by taiboxa
    show me studies..
    eq at 1200/wk did nothing for my appetite
    let alone 600 and 900/wk
    Am not sure studies would make you get an appetite , alot of user do claim an increase in appetite so i would say there are the studies what back it up,

    Also alot of vets use EQ for there horses if there is a weakness in there frame,it usually improves the general state of the weakened horses helping to correct the lost of weight and to stimulate the appetite, its a common drug to use in the veterinary world for weaken horses who would benefit with an increase of appetite,

    With all studies you will find another stating the completely opposite, the best way to judge eq is get first hand experience of the user's and many say an increase so that settles it for me,

    Got to say it didnt with me, infact it doesn't do much

  34. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    yeah thats me in avvy
    Posts
    5,669

    EQ-how do you like it

    Quote Originally Posted by Liftnainez
    did u run this dose yourself?? or did you read this and now posting it???
    Thats almost an insulting question bro,Ive used eq a shitload of times to finally say i'm done with it.Its weak and not worth a crap to me anyway...but if other people lie it to each his own.

  35. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    gettin lucky in kentucky
    Posts
    1,729
    Quote Originally Posted by MAXIMA5
    I ran the EXACT same injectable doses of thos compounds for 17 weeks. The only difference is I ran var for the first 6, then Tbol for the rest.

    I didn;t get anything from the EQ until after week 15. All of a sudden during week 15 I looked down and noticed new veins. I don't think it was worth the money I spent on 16 weeks worth. I could have used something more effective and spent less.
    i guess i should have gotten some deca instead because it worked very well last cycle. i'll just keep at 600mg and see what happens.

  36. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    VA - Formerly OH
    Posts
    2,774
    Quote Originally Posted by JAYROD
    i guess i should have gotten some deca instead because it worked very well last cycle. i'll just keep at 600mg and see what happens.
    YEah, you might end up loving it.

    I was somewhat satisfied with my results, but like I said, the cost:results ratio left much to be desired.

  37. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,717
    Anyone interested in EQ should try Bold Base once or twice... Once you've tried base, it's tough to go back to undecylenate.

    I'd have to say there are better things than EQ ... so if you're really on a tight budget, it's not going to give you much for your $$ ... although there is always the occaissional good-responder. I like EQ for the appetite stimulation, however, B12 @ 1000mcg ED gives me a stronger appetite than EQ does - although i do believe the combination of them is better still.

    My mantra is "frontload" ... and I think that should be done with ANY long half-life injectible. If you don't know how you respond to a long half lifed ester, you should be using a short half life ester to test your sensitivity and optimal result dosing schedule... which brings us right back to frontloading.

    Tren gives me wretched acne when coming off of it - I'm about to start using it again - I'll include accutane as soon as I start coming off it this time.

    Deca makes me a bit lethargic ... but I'm sure I'll try it again...


    The profiles you read about drugs offer you a GREAT starting point to analyze your initial run with it - however, once you have PERSONAL experience with a drug ... and you know how YOU respond to it - you can throw out ALL that theoretical and statistical information. So ... the way this ties in to EQ? If you haven't used it ... know what the likelihood of your results to be, and make the economic estimation of what the trial is worth relative to your access to funds.

  38. #38
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    barbados
    Posts
    6,251
    Quote Originally Posted by Two4the$$
    Anyone interested in EQ should try Bold Base once or twice... Once you've tried base, it's tough to go back to undecylenate.

    I'd have to say there are better things than EQ ... so if you're really on a tight budget, it's not going to give you much for your $$ ... although there is always the occaissional good-responder. I like EQ for the appetite stimulation, however, B12 @ 1000mcg ED gives me a stronger appetite than EQ does - although i do believe the combination of them is better still.

    My mantra is "frontload" ... and I think that should be done with ANY long half-life injectible. If you don't know how you respond to a long half lifed ester, you should be using a short half life ester to test your sensitivity and optimal result dosing schedule... which brings us right back to frontloading.

    Tren gives me wretched acne when coming off of it - I'm about to start using it again - I'll include accutane as soon as I start coming off it this time.

    Deca makes me a bit lethargic ... but I'm sure I'll try it again...


    The profiles you read about drugs offer you a GREAT starting point to analyze your initial run with it - however, once you have PERSONAL experience with a drug ... and you know how YOU respond to it - you can throw out ALL that theoretical and statistical information. So ... the way this ties in to EQ? If you haven't used it ... know what the likelihood of your results to be, and make the economic estimation of what the trial is worth relative to your access to funds.
    Excellent point and i agree. If you can homebrew try using base hormones, just suck up the shots.

  39. #39
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    264
    Quote Originally Posted by Two4the$$
    The profiles you read about drugs offer you a GREAT starting point to analyze your initial run with it - however, once you have PERSONAL experience with a drug ... and you know how YOU respond to it - you can throw out ALL that theoretical and statistical information. So ... the way this ties in to EQ? If you haven't used it ... know what the likelihood of your results to be, and make the economic estimation of what the trial is worth relative to your access to funds.
    Good point Bro!

    I totally agree everyone is different and everyone responds differently to drugs.

  40. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    14,421
    EQ = 1g a week. If not i feel it's a wast.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •