
Originally Posted by
MuscleInk
I agree with YOU. I didn't say I believe there is no subjective difference. I was simply providing the current rationale behind some MDs' view of TRT and its necessity. The highest my endogenous T reaches is 162 and that was before I ever used gear. Now, after a few cycles, the highest it typically goes is 52!!!!! I know exactly how low T feels and believe you me, it is extremely unpleasant when its well below normal ranges.
From the perspective of many (not all, thankfully) MDs, the risks of TRT (elevated hemoglobin, RBCs, LDL, TC, TG, decreased HDL, hair loss, acne, and psychological changes in some cases) far outweigh the benefits for men still within normal ranges - even when at the lower end of normal.
Many men seeking TRT for low T are looking for improvements in quality of life. Most men on THIS board are the exception. They want higher free T levels so they can feel better and see some physical improvements and in many (not every) case, use TRT to maintain levels between cycles. Many men seeking TRT do not fit in that category. Moreover, I know very few MDs personally (I would of course be the exception) that would endorse or condone TRT as a "bridge" to maintain normal levels between anabolic cycles.
I understand what you are saying. I'm not in disagreement, nor did I state that view, but remember, to a physician, a normal range is a normal range even if low and men on this board would not be representative of most men using TRT IMO.