which sides are worse?
pro-hormones
steroids
which sides are worse?
comparing both, prohormones are not worth it IMO
Hmm...prohormones r much weaker, but they still might be quite useful if only used in direct cycles+ good food (and "diet") and intensive workouts. I'd even say: if there was good supplement store in my area, containing also good prohormonal supplements, I'd never try any roids, because...haahaaa I don't need such gains as, for example, Ronnie Coleman has.
P.S. I'm also going to say, that I'm ****in angry, EU directives ban them to be selled in Europe.
Last edited by hdd123; 05-02-2008 at 06:57 AM.
WTF!? Look just at the results of voting...haahaaa, it already becoming ****ing funny. The idea by itself to make topic containing roid & prohormone wars is quite absurd, especially on steroid site.
Where's the option for uneducated and irresponsible use?
Hard question to answer. Im currently on my 1st aas cycle 500mg sust/wk and currently on week 5 with zero sides not even a pimple. However I've run the PH Halo-50 as well with zero sides and I also have run a Methyl-Test PH that had me incrediably broken-out everywhere and shut down for months after.
prohormones are cant get wood thats why
PH suck donkey balls, and i dont think should even be compared to the real thing.......IMO if you are going to mess with a prohormone, why not just do the real thing and get a lot better results.......
pro hormones are worse.. they screw up your body the same and they are less effective. it's that simple!
can i vote again? j/k i fvcking clicked the wrong one lol
im only just starting my fifth week on injectables, but i would say orals easily.
stay away from the ph. I knw guys still sitting on cases of 1AD and they cannot move it cuz everyone wized up to that bs.
buying cases of PH.....an even dumber idea........i think i will save some money on this crap by buying it in bulk.....AWESOME
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)