Mg for mg which compound is considered a better muscle builder? My friend and I are having a discussion on the subject. This isn't a thread for everyone to tell me how to cycle, this is purely a question about the 2 compounds.
Mg for mg which compound is considered a better muscle builder? My friend and I are having a discussion on the subject. This isn't a thread for everyone to tell me how to cycle, this is purely a question about the 2 compounds.
I am curious as well.
Both are two completely different compounds......
personally it all varies on the persons diet for best results..
But the main thing to think of is.... wdeca shouldn't be ran alone... it should have some sort of test with it as well whether it be Test E/C, prop....... So it is usually more then just a deca cycle... where as test e you can run alone an see good gains.
Tht nis like asking which is more powerful Gasoline or Nitrous Oxide... One compliments the other... same thing with Deca.. it works Great.. when Stacked testosterone.. by itself mit is horrible and will give you the limpest noodle you have ever seen!
exactly.... thats what i was trying to get at nine... but maybe it didnt come out right. hahaha
Listen, I know all the things people are thinking.
A. Deca should not be run alone.
b. It depends on the person's genetics, diet, lifting philosophy etc.
c. Different people will have different results.
My question is, if a person was cloned and each person lifted the same, ate the same, etc. the only difference being one was given 250 mgs of test e and the clone was given 250 mgs of deca, in most informed people's opinions which person would experience the greater muscle/strength growth?
Thank you.
IDK...... I am not stupid enough to run deca alone... therefore idk how well it will work.....
I like my penis working.
Dude are you serious? I realize Deca can and will shut you down. I think most on this board understand that and wouldn't dare run it without Test.
The question isn't whether or not you should run test concurrently with Deca, it's which compound is considered the stronger compound/muscle builder.
You obviously don't understand that we here are not fools... so how are we to judge how one compound will work vs another... when one of them is ran with the other?
Its a stupid F*cking question.
Deca should be ran with test... But is test better at building muscle?
I cant even think of something to compare this to because it is so damn stupid.
I have heard most people say Deca is stronger than test .
No i have not. Decas detection time is far to long for the career im trying to pursue. and everyone i talk to who runs it prefers tren over deca. deca is to much bloat they say.
Use both at the same time. You can't evenly compare them to eachother as they do different things. As far as bloat off of deca...I didn't get any. The only thing that ever got me bloated was sust. Deca is great if you're going to be lifting really heavy (powerlifting), makes your joints feel oh-so-good.
We have a no flaming policy here bro.. And no i am not slow.... but your question is strictly stupid i am sorry....
and i can bash it because several guys around me whos jobs dont care about that shit have run it..... Personally.... it doesn't ****ing matter.. because.... test and deca should be ran together.
we are going to get some newb on here seeing that someone says deca is better.. and a week later the newb is going to come back asking why his pencil isnt working........ thats the problem i see with this post.
and to answer your question... yes i think 19nor are stronger then test itself.
I answered the question a long time ago... If you would have gotten your head out of your ass and read you would have seen that. Perhaps you don't know which falls under the 19nor. The whole question is not thought out though and is just stupid.. Personally I think my IQ dropped after reading all of your comments.
I answered yer stupid question a LONG time ago.
So i did grasp and understand the question. And I did have something to add to the thread. Wanted to make sure you understood the idiotness of it all. I help plenty of people here... And in the three years you have been here..... have never seen you. Soo maybe you need to get out of the lounge and get over here more. I knew the answer and stated it. You my friend didnt.
Last edited by c-Z; 09-02-2009 at 05:23 AM.
I can honestly say I am on several boards and this site gives the worst advice period. This board NEEDS vets with experiance this is just stupid IMO/. Jigga, Mad Matt, DSM plus a bunch of other worthy vets here.
Last edited by gymnerd; 09-01-2009 at 08:04 PM.
wow i cant belive this post. The advice you two idiots have gotten on here is good advice and its true. HOw could one answer a question like that. That fact that your asking it makes you sound like you need to do more research before jumping on this forum and wasting everybodys time
You're being serious also aren't you?? Unfreakingbelievable. In the original thread I wasn't asking advice, I was posing a question.
I had been having a discussion with another weightlifting friend of mine, we disagreed so I thought I would ask this forum.
Let me state again: I do understand test should be a base for virtually any cycle someone wants to run. I was not asking advice, I was asking which compound was stronger: Testosterone enanthate or Deca Durabolin.
Kind of like which compound is stronger Dianabol or Anadrol or which compound is stronger Tren or Halo? I just choose to compare Test e and Deca. Are we now clear?
Dbol and drol are both similiar... Comparing apple to apples....
Deca and test... are not. your comparing apples to oranges...
how about... test prop vs test e... That would be more logical IMO......
It all comes down to personal experience. how your body reacts to the substance.......
Go look at the drol vs dbol threads.. half say dbol is better. the other half says drol is better... but because you think dbol is better the people who think drol are better are idiots? no.....
If you do not like this board then go somewhere else!! I have been a member on several other boards and i disagree i think 99% of the people on those other boards could not run a decent cycle if they had LLewellyn there helping them!
Test Is a Better Base
Deca Will give greater Strength Gains.... IMO
Hey gym nerd, are you having a bad day? I am as well. Please do not bash the forum in which you participate. Thank You
My advice is from personal experience.. And what I have seen.... Many of my friends are users. because I haven't ran deca.. Doesn't mean shit. I have seen its affects.
BTW its not really paroting when the advice is coming from another user on the internet....
BRO IF YOU DONT LIKE IT HERE! then gtfo... plain and simple..... If your not happy with the members here etc... I'm sure admin wouldnt have a problem removing you...
I taught you what i thought here....
Its a stupid question. Lets compare a 500hp car... and a 150hp car...? Does it make sense? Which is faster? Two completely different things.. like i said test e and prop would be more logical.. Smart ass.![]()
Well I think the question is good.
But it's really hard to answer (because yes test should always follow deca).
But nonetheless I hope someone can answer this straight forward without the mumbojumbo.
Say you don't care about your dick and decide to run deca alone, or test alone.
Which would yield better gains at 1g / week.
Have a good one
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)