why is prop the type of test that is normally suggested for a cutting cycle? why not enan or other longer acting ester test?
why is prop the type of test that is normally suggested for a cutting cycle? why not enan or other longer acting ester test?
You have less bloat with prop, the shorter the ester the less bloat, this is nice when you are cutting, you don't want to much estrogen water bloat.
Pain
i know why they say it but i have been thinking why does it matter if you have alittle bloat take some anti e's if its that big of a deal and the bloat will go away anyway after your off cycle
i havent saw any kind of proof other than preference
JLI
Another reason is because most cutting anabolics have to be injected ed or eod anyways (example: fina, winny).... so they just stack the prop in the same syringe. Bloat is the main reason though, not everyone wants to get liquidex.
Why would you want spend that much extra money on anti e's when you can just change your gear. Whois has a good point about usually stacking with fina and winny too.
Pain
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)