running GH and IGF

[Captain Fantastic]

can these two be run in the same pin?

[PT]

i wouldnt. i shoot gh in my stomach and igf into the muscles im working that day

[rodge]

hgh is to be used subq.

igf is shot im.

-rodge

[kingof516]

well technically you could do it. IM shots of gh have no real advantage...but my only concern or question rather relates to how you are constituting the IGF.

[supersteve]

^^ I believe it results in a higher peak concentration of hgh

[kaorialfred]

bump

[Gear]

IM shots of gh have no real advantage

No matter what you shoot, IM injections will always have a higher absorbency rate than Sub-Q. That is the advantage that IM has over Sub-Q.

-Gear

[SPIKE]

No matter what you shoot, IM injections will always have a higher absorbency rate than Sub-Q. That is the advantage that IM has over Sub-Q.

-Gear

So what do you say? I just started a 6 month cycle of GH about 3 weeks ago and am going Sub-Q. I always haev. You think I should go intramsucular?

[needmassx3]

So what do you say? I just started a 6 month cycle of GH about 3 weeks ago and am going Sub-Q. I always haev. You think I should go intramsucular?

My doc told me to shoot IM

[SPIKE]

My doc told me to shoot IM

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.. You go in the shoulder? I'm hearing more and more on IM not sub-Q. I think I"m going to switch it up to IM. Any reason why?? Thanks!!

[Gear]

So what do you say? I just started a 6 month cycle of GH about 3 weeks ago and am going Sub-Q. I always haev. You think I should go intramsucular?

No, stick to doing Sub-Q because HGH is recomended to be taken that way. I was just saying that it can also be taken IM as well. Most people take GH Sub-Q and are happy with the results, so stick to taking GH that way.

-Gear

[rodge]

hgh gives a litle site specific fatloss if shot subq.

-rodge

[Gear]

hgh gives a litle site specific fatloss if shot subq.

-rodge

There you have it. Great point.

-Gear

[SPIKE]

There you have it. Great point.

-Gear

You 2 guys are good. Really informative and always on point. The question of Sub-Q or IM is especially important to me bc of my situation. I dont know if you read the thread I started about a month ago. I had plasic surgery on my midsection. An ab sculp and slight lipo of the abs and flanks. Actually the first time perfoprmed in CT and only the 4th state in the US that this has been done in. That's why I'm so concerned. I have "dead" fat deposits in my abdominal region. So I"m curious if I"m wasting it. AHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh raising eyebrows huh guys????? See now its a differnet game. I've been going sub-Q and think I am goign to stick w/ it. I'm just trying to pinch sections of my frontal area that hasnt been worked on.

[JohnnyB]

I've used hgh IM it worked fine

JohnnyB

[Nicky B]

I've used hgh IM it worked fine

JohnnyB

Did you see an advantage from IM over sub-q.

[needmassx3]

Did you see an advantage from IM over sub-q.

Im pretty sure theres a higher absorbtion rate

[Gear]

You 2 guys are good. Really informative and always on point. The question of Sub-Q or IM is especially important to me bc of my situation. I dont know if you read the thread I started about a month ago. I had plasic surgery on my midsection. An ab sculp and slight lipo of the abs and flanks. Actually the first time perfoprmed in CT and only the 4th state in the US that this has been done in. That's why I'm so concerned. I have "dead" fat deposits in my abdominal region. So I"m curious if I"m wasting it. AHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh raising eyebrows huh guys????? See now its a differnet game. I've been going sub-Q and think I am goign to stick w/ it. I'm just trying to pinch sections of my frontal area that hasnt been worked on.

I would stick to Sub-Q, perhaps inject in areas that weren't effected by the operation as much.

Hope all turned out well.

-Gear