Now i heard this before, once you do a cycle of roids even after you come off you will always be at a slight advantage over people who never used roids... FACT or FICTION?
Thanks
RR![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Now i heard this before, once you do a cycle of roids even after you come off you will always be at a slight advantage over people who never used roids... FACT or FICTION?
Thanks
RR![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
i'm guessing you mean advantage in lifting?
Wrong, wrong, wrong! You will slowly lose all the "artificial" gains you make(from six months to a year). Plus, you will have that taste in your mouth of the way training on AAS feels. So, I think you may be at a disadvantage unless you intend to stay on for good.
Originally Posted by Furo-master
wrong wrong wrong, you will not lose "all your gains" if you take the proper steps such as proper PCT, diet, and exercise.
305
fictionOriginally Posted by Roid Rage
i agree with 305Originally Posted by 305GUY
And by advantage i meant... a slight strength advantage and the ability to put on size advantage!
Anymore comments?
RR
Do you mean bad breath? I saw the side affects on that anti roids picture a few weeks ago.Originally Posted by Furo-master
As long as you don't stop your proper diet and workout regime cold turkey after you cycle you should keep most, with the correct pct to of course.
Originally Posted by Seattle Junk
Ha ha ya I remember that to.
Originally Posted by bigbadbootydaddy
well yeah i know that but i'm talking about over all ... i guess that kind of does and doesn't answer my question... meh oh well heh![]()
Originally Posted by Roid Rage
I know what your saying (I think) like I said earlier. If that is the only cycle you ever do then yes I believe you would have an edge over what you would naturally gain over time.
i agree i took an 7 month break from lifting 1 year after my first cycle. I still looked almost the same and weighed only a couple pounds less, but then i got back into the gym and in a little over a month i had all my gains back and then some, muscle memory weird. Also the beginning of the thread mentioning juicing even one cycle to be an overall advantage, i will slightly agree but only on one hypothisized count. i know a lot of guys that lift naturally and no matter how much they gain even if they have a lot of muscle, their bodies still dont look that great. i believe that juice can alter the shape of ones muscle bellies unlike natural lifting can, giving them a more developed look and huge increases in muscle maturity, that sometimes arent in the cards for everyone genetically. steroids ability to sh-it on genetics, jm .02 though.Originally Posted by 305GUY
If hg/igf-1 is classified as a steroid, then it would be a definite yes since you just crossed your genetic limit and have produced 'new muscle cells'.![]()
ok now i got some good reponsesthanks
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)