You Wont Believe The LAB Tests on QV Gear from the 2006 Anabolics Guide!

[CatGrabber]

I made this thread the other day and had a great response and feedback. It helped many of you and shocked many of you all at once. Due to the fact some underground labs were mentioned, the thread was taken down. It had a ton of good info. I hope none of you will ask me about any UG lab test results so we can keep this thead up as most of you have me check your gear and see if it was tested. They have many brands tested in the book.

The following lab tests were conducted by the Authors of the new 2006 Anabolic Ref Guide at Melecular Nutrition.

Below are some QV results that might shock you...

Oxymethalone (anadrol) tested at 71.7mgs out of 75mgs -----GOOD
DECA 200 tested at 180mgs out of 200mgs -----FAIR
STEN tested 10.5mgs out of 10 -----GOOD
EQ tested 198mgs out of 200 -----GOOD
TEST CYP tested 136mgs out of 200mgs -----TERRIBLE
TEST ENANTHATE tested 158mgs out of 250mgs -----TERRIBLE
WINNY TABS tested 11mgs out of 10mgs -----GOOD

BOTTOM LINE

QV Tabs seem to be very good. QV test appears to be garbage. (a very informed member) said he has had no problems with QV Test Prop. He is very experianced so if you have Prop, do not fret too much.

Again, this info is right from the ANABOLICS 2006 book. They have MANY brands of gear that were tested. I will happily check your gear and post the results they got as long as it is NOT an underground lab so please do not ask so our new and improved thread remains here for all to learn from.

I apoligize to any MODS for breaking any rules from my last post. Im not sure If I did or others did so lets keep it within the rules. Cat

[soccer#3]

interesting

[stuball]

enan350, if you have the 2006 anabolics reference manual, then i think i have the answer, underdosed, i think 219 mgs per ml, when it should be 350, but thats one test result, from one lot #, correct me if im wrong

[tvd220]

I was happy to hear that my brovel gear was on point.

[CatGrabber]

Brovel did very good. Cat

[stuball]

Cat did you check the enan 350 for me or was i right ?? By the way good looking out for the brothers ..

[southpaw26]

i am not supprised that he qv test was underdosed. i have always thought that.

[CatGrabber]

TY STU...Ill get on it...1 sec. That is if they dont ban me. I was run down the other thread regarding this by a mod. Telling me to "Get over it" when all we asked for is "why a good thread was taken down" Go figure. Cat

[eL FriJolerO]

wo0w, nice post bro, good info. i was scared at first since i just got new QV deca, at least it didn't rate terrible...

I'm rooting for you Cat my brotha. Don't know why mods are making this such a bid deal, you apoligized for the last thread and all, you think that'd be enough. but what the heck...go Cat

[1buffsob]

Let's keep all UGL's outta of this thread. If you are unsure if a specific lab is a UGL, please PM a mod, me, or maybe Cat if he is cool with it. Do not use a !@#* in place of a letter or two, cuz you're pushing the envelope. Either way, Cat, I think this is an awesome thread.

1buffsob

[Booz]

TY STU...Ill get on it...1 sec. That is if they dont ban me. I was run down the other thread regarding this by a mod. Telling me to "Get over it" when all we asked for is "why a good thread was taken down" Go figure. Cat

you was told why the thread was removed mate...what is the problem now?

[heavyrotation92]

I am pretty sure swolecat won't want his reference stated bro...

[1buffsob]

Let's not start this shit again. Keep the thread going the route that was intended and make this an informative thread.

1buffsob

[G-1000]

you was told why the thread was removed mate...what is the problem now?

[Booz]

I'm rooting for you Cat my brotha. Don't know why mods are making this such a bid deal, you apoligized for the last thread and all, you think that'd be enough. but what the heck...go Cat

so you do not agree with the rules of the board then friend.................

[Streaker]

Thanks for putting this post back up cat.

[Booz]

Cat as said in the prev thread about this....it was not your thread that was the problem it was the countless mentionings of ugls by other members......we do not have a problem with your thread or you...but continuing to harp on about why it was closed is not becoming...where the reason has been told....................and it was a good reason board rules were broken...now can we let it lie...please..

[CatGrabber]

you was told why the thread was removed mate...what is the problem now?

See the other thread when I asked why my thread was removed. I was happy with your explanation booze. It made 100% sence to me and I will abide by this simple rule now. I thank you for taking time to inform me an the other bros so we can enjoy this thread. Another mod had to tell me to GET OVER IT. I simply did not think that was needed. I was over it. Cat

[CatGrabber]

so you do not agree with the rules of the board then friend.................

I think we are all on the same page now. Lets just start over and get back to whats important. We all know what we cannot do. I will make sure to keep this post clean. Thank you again to Booz. Cat

[CatGrabber]

I was asked to post Products as well. I will do that when I get home for those of you interested. There are some good lab tests for this company as well.... This will b up tonight

[Streaker]

Sorry to keep bugging you Cat but is there any chance of you looking up Test 250?

[USfighterFC]

Cat thats some pretty informative info, just do me the favor and take that Mods name out of your first post. I dont know if he approved of that without consent. Interesting read tho.

[TheMudMan]

I'm rooting for you Cat my brotha. Don't know why mods are making this such a bid deal, you apoligized for the last thread and all, you think that'd be enough. but what the heck...go Cat

Why are you turning something that was nothing into a two sided thing?

[TheMudMan]

I'm going to go through the thread and delete all the UG names. If I see another one posted that person will be suspended for a week and the thread deleted.

Cat - This is a good thread with very good info but the UG names have to stay out of it.

[USfighterFC]

I'm going to go through the thread and delete all the UG names. If I see another one posted that person will be suspended for a week and the thread deleted.

Cat - This is a good thread with very good info but the UG names have to stay out of it.

Just noticed myself that their a bunch of UGL names in here as well.

[MotorBoatin' SOB]

more more more

[RA]

^^^^

[STB]

I am thinking it would be nice to know what tested the worst. It would be good info for the bros on the board, but would fly in the face of the no UGL name rule.

Kind of a drag. I would like to know if my gear was 50% under-dosed. I guess I can go buy Anabolics 2006, along with the other 1000 people that would like to see the info.



Bluesman

[1buffsob]

I always felt QV test was way underdosed. But Jesus, I didn't think it was that bad. I wonder how AP compares to QV. Same parent company, I wouldn't think it's that much different, but most seem to think AP is of higher quality.

1buffsob

[TheMudMan]

I am thinking it would be nice to know what tested the worst. It would be good info for the bros on the board, but would fly in the face of the no UGL name rule.

Kind of a drag. I would like to know if my gear was 50% under-dosed. I guess I can go buy Anabolics 2006, along with the other 1000 people that would like to see the info.



Bluesman

You could buy the book......... and I'm not being a dick but the book is a good reference to have for tests, fakes, and what is thought about the product.

[2bshredded]

I am thinking it would be nice to know what tested the worst. It would be good info for the bros on the board, but would fly in the face of the no UGL name rule.

Kind of a drag. I would like to know if my gear was 50% under-dosed. I guess I can go buy Anabolics 2006, along with the other 1000 people that would like to see the info.



Bluesman

Education is always a good thing, the $$ nothing to what you gain, IMO.

[love 2 lift]

How about Animal Power testE and Eq?
I never saw my answer in the last thread since it was deleted.
Thanks Bro

[givemethejuice]

aaaa

[neverenuff21]

uggh

[stuball]

You could buy the book......... and I'm not being a dick but the book is a good reference to have for tests, fakes, and what is thought about the product.

I got the book but what does that prove they test one vial one lot # maybe 25 different brands, so if it comes back underdosed, its just that one vial, there are millions of vials and amps out their, whats bad for one might not reflect another, the only way you can tell is get it tested yourself, you could have a brand thats dosed at 100 % but some sh!thead might pull a couple of ml's out of each vial, and have hundreds of vials hes selling and replace it with piss!! Guys, sorry but buyind AS this is a crap shoot...

[stuball]

uggh

AND THE GOOD THING ABOUT THE BOOK IS THAT THEY SHOW PICTURES OF THE FAKES , AND THE LEGIT ONES, SORRY ABOUT THE CAPS

[eL FriJolerO]

Why are you turning something that was nothing into a two sided thing?

Wasn't my intention, maybe i should've kept that one to myself...sorry.

[CatGrabber]

Lets keep the peace bros. We are all here for the same reason. To learn and grow. Anyway, I promised a few of you test results from ......ugl...... The results are as follows...

OXANDRALONE 10mgs tested at 7.25mgs....BAD
EQ 200mgs tested at a mere 132mgs.......BAD
TEST PROP 100mgs tested at 88.7mgs.....FAIR
TEST ENENTHATE 100 (yes 100mgs) tested at 154mgs....FANTASTIC
NOTE: batch 2 of BD TEST E tested at only 67.8mgs out of 100mgs. LOT # 69993

TREN 75mgs tested at 87.5mgs.....GOOD

A member made a very good point in this thread. He stated that just because these tests show these results it does NOT mean your batch is the same. It DOES show IMO the level of quality this company has. Cat

[CatGrabber]

enan350, if you have the 2006 anabolics reference manual, then i think i have the answer, underdosed, i think 219 mgs per ml, when it should be 350, but thats one test result, from one lot #, correct me if im wrong

Stu, you are 100% correct on both accounts. 219mgs. The LOT # they tested was 0507 ET. Hope this helps. CAT

[CatGrabber]

TORNEL, DENKAL AND BROVEL RESULTS...

BROVEL Deca 200mgs tested at 177mgs....FAIR
TORNEL Deca 200mgs tested at 134mgs......TERRIBLE
DENKAL Deca 200mgs tested at 155mgs.......BAD
DENKAL EQ 100mgs tested at 100mgs.........GOOD
TORNEL EQ 50mgs tested at 56.2 mgs........GOOD
DENKAL T400 tested at 302.4mgs..............TERRIBLE
DENKAL Test Cyp 250mgs tested at 238mgs...GOOD
BROVEL Test Enan 200mgs tested at 199mgs...GOOD
TORNEL Test Enen 200mgs tested at 177mgs....FAIR


I hope this helps shed some more light on this subject. Pretty suprizing facts.