Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Injection Myth? True or False

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    No Steroids for you..NEXT
    Posts
    2,636
    Who told you that bro??

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    I live in North Texas
    Posts
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by TJM7275 View Post
    Who told you that bro??
    damn bro its been soo long, but i think it was the guy i used to get my gear from back in the day, lol thats why i switched to injectin the quad, but heres another question, since i have hit the lower body in ages lol my "GLUTES" are no longer tight like they used to be know what i mean, soo if i do another cycle, should i inject into my flabby ass or quad?

    Couldnt do lower body for a while due to knee surgery

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by SayIWont21 View Post
    damn bro its been soo long, but i think it was the guy i used to get my gear from back in the day, lol thats why i switched to injectin the quad, but heres another question, since i have hit the lower body in ages lol my "GLUTES" are no longer tight like they used to be know what i mean, soo if i do another cycle, should i inject into my flabby ass or quad?

    Couldnt do lower body for a while due to knee surgery

    bump for that question

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,747
    Quote Originally Posted by hdrider135 View Post
    bump for that question
    the poster kind of answers it himself, in that if you are shooting glutes you should use a 1.5 inch needle, if you have more fat than that to get through, your bodyfat is too high and gear needs to wait until a lower bf% is achieved. so my answer is no, you hold off until you lower your bf%.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    32,801
    if you shoot directly in your sack you get 110% absorption

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,747
    Quote Originally Posted by gixxerboy1 View Post
    if you shoot directly in your sack you get 110% absorption
    i thought sack absorption was 120%......... ouch!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •