So Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Receptor gene, thats not a diseased state? Just because it exists as a gene does not necessarily mean it is not a diseased state. There are a number of intact genes which cause harm. You're attempting to differentiate this one for emotional and political reasons. I am completely divorced from that train of thinking when it comes to science. If statistically X percent of something is this, and a narrow percent of Y is this, then Y is the abnormality.
There are FAR more brown eyed people than blue eyed people.Are blue eyes abnormal?And if your answer is yes, is that automatically a bad thing?Blond hair is in the same position.As a matter of fact, there are more males born than females in any year,does that make being female an abnormality?
This got interesting...
Im on the fence. I can see where both parties are coming from.
So DSM, Tock, or anyone gay for that matter. There is actually a gay gene? But didn't you say you use to be straight (DSM)? So is this gay gene like cancer and takes over "normal" cells at a certain point in life?
And just if anyone didn't know already, Im all for peoples rights.
Last edited by xlxBigSexyxlx; 07-02-2009 at 10:03 PM.
I say that jokingly . Did i use to date women ? Yes. A lot of it had to do with my environment . When you are growing up what do all your buddies talk about ? Having sex with women. I did the same to fit in even though i would think about guys. It was always there i just ignored it because it was the easier choice.
Oh my god. Seriously?
NO. being gay is not "a cancer." It's an imbalance of HORMONES in the body, which as a result create an altered sexual attraction. OF COURSE IT'S GENETIC. It's been proven many, many times. Most people who are gay WISH they weren't gay, and can't understand why they were "created" gay.
Being homosexual is NOT a life-style choice. It's a hereditary trait.
Similarly, people who are transsexual, did NOT choose to feel as if they were born the wrong sex. It's completely reliant on hormones. Basically, my feeling is though that homo-sexuality is not a "genetic defect" rather it's a form of evolution.
-- For anyone who doesn't understand why I consider homosexuality to be a form of evolution... consider this: a male-frog can ALMOST INSTANTANEOUSLY alter it's sex, and become a female, in order to reproduce... IMO homosexuality is just man-kinds version of this adaptation.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)