Results 1 to 40 of 56

Thread: Church posts video of Gay Exorcism; Outrage ensues

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    30,963
    Quote Originally Posted by thegodfather View Post
    Biologically/Physically speaking? Modern medicine...

    Remember that statement you made the next time you go into the ER in cardiac arrest ok. Or maybe if you are ever diagnosed with cancer, just tell the doc, who are you to determine that dysplasia and hyperplasia aren't normal?
    Should i post all the recent scientific facts/studys on a gay gene or do they just not count ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Middle East
    Posts
    3,511
    Quote Originally Posted by DSM4Life View Post
    Should i post all the recent scientific facts/studys on a gay gene or do they just not count ?
    So Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Receptor gene, thats not a diseased state? Just because it exists as a gene does not necessarily mean it is not a diseased state. There are a number of intact genes which cause harm. You're attempting to differentiate this one for emotional and political reasons. I am completely divorced from that train of thinking when it comes to science. If statistically X percent of something is this, and a narrow percent of Y is this, then Y is the abnormality.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Beyond the Pale.
    Posts
    936
    Quote Originally Posted by thegodfather View Post
    So Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Receptor gene, thats not a diseased state? Just because it exists as a gene does not necessarily mean it is not a diseased state. There are a number of intact genes which cause harm. You're attempting to differentiate this one for emotional and political reasons. I am completely divorced from that train of thinking when it comes to science. If statistically X percent of something is this, and a narrow percent of Y is this, then Y is the abnormality.
    There are FAR more brown eyed people than blue eyed people.Are blue eyes abnormal?And if your answer is yes, is that automatically a bad thing?Blond hair is in the same position.As a matter of fact, there are more males born than females in any year,does that make being female an abnormality?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    13,966
    This got interesting...

    Im on the fence. I can see where both parties are coming from.

    So DSM, Tock, or anyone gay for that matter. There is actually a gay gene? But didn't you say you use to be straight (DSM)? So is this gay gene like cancer and takes over "normal" cells at a certain point in life?


    And just if anyone didn't know already, Im all for peoples rights.
    Last edited by xlxBigSexyxlx; 07-02-2009 at 10:03 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Beyond the Pale.
    Posts
    936
    Quote Originally Posted by xlxBigSexyxlx View Post
    This got interesting...

    Im on the fence. I can see where both parties are coming from.

    So DSM, Tock, or anyone gay for that matter. There is actually a gay gene? But didn't you say you use to be straight (DSM)? So is this gay gene like cancer and takes over "normal" cells at a certain point in life?


    And just if anyone didn't know already, Im all for peoples rights.
    Wait, what?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    30,963
    Quote Originally Posted by xlxBigSexyxlx View Post
    This got interesting...

    Im on the fence. I can see where both parties are coming from.

    So DSM, Tock, or anyone gay for that matter. There is actually a gay gene? But didn't you say you use to be straight (DSM)? So is this gay gene like cancer and takes over "normal" cells at a certain point in life?


    And just if anyone didn't know already, Im all for peoples rights.
    I say that jokingly . Did i use to date women ? Yes. A lot of it had to do with my environment . When you are growing up what do all your buddies talk about ? Having sex with women. I did the same to fit in even though i would think about guys. It was always there i just ignored it because it was the easier choice.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    13,966
    Quote Originally Posted by DSM4Life View Post
    I say that jokingly . Did i use to date women ? Yes. A lot of it had to do with my environment . When you are growing up what do all your buddies talk about ? Having sex with women. I did the same to fit in even though i would think about guys. It was always there i just ignored it because it was the easier choice.
    I see.... thanks for clearing that up.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,751
    Quote Originally Posted by xlxBigSexyxlx View Post
    So DSM, Tock, or anyone gay for that matter. There is actually a gay gene? But didn't you say you use to be straight (DSM)? So is this gay gene like cancer and takes over "normal" cells at a certain point in life?


    And just if anyone didn't know already, Im all for peoples rights.
    Oh my god. Seriously?

    NO. being gay is not "a cancer." It's an imbalance of HORMONES in the body, which as a result create an altered sexual attraction. OF COURSE IT'S GENETIC. It's been proven many, many times. Most people who are gay WISH they weren't gay, and can't understand why they were "created" gay.

    Being homosexual is NOT a life-style choice. It's a hereditary trait.

    Similarly, people who are transsexual, did NOT choose to feel as if they were born the wrong sex. It's completely reliant on hormones. Basically, my feeling is though that homo-sexuality is not a "genetic defect" rather it's a form of evolution.

    -- For anyone who doesn't understand why I consider homosexuality to be a form of evolution... consider this: a male-frog can ALMOST INSTANTANEOUSLY alter it's sex, and become a female, in order to reproduce... IMO homosexuality is just man-kinds version of this adaptation.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    324
    Quote Originally Posted by seriousmass View Post
    Oh my god. Seriously?

    NO. being gay is not "a cancer." It's an imbalance of HORMONES in the body, which as a result create an altered sexual attraction. OF COURSE IT'S GENETIC. It's been proven many, many times. Most people who are gay WISH they weren't gay, and can't understand why they were "created" gay.

    Being homosexual is NOT a life-style choice. It's a hereditary trait.

    Similarly, people who are transsexual, did NOT choose to feel as if they were born the wrong sex. It's completely reliant on hormones. Basically, my feeling is though that homo-sexuality is not a "genetic defect" rather it's a form of evolution.

    -- For anyone who doesn't understand why I consider homosexuality to be a form of evolution... consider this: a male-frog can ALMOST INSTANTANEOUSLY alter it's sex, and become a female, in order to reproduce... IMO homosexuality is just man-kinds version of this adaptation.


    are you saying in future years men will be able to do what this frog does .

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by countrybhoy View Post
    are you saying in future years men will be able to do what this frog does .
    i think thats what hes saying. you know its bad when even you thought that was a dumb comment.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •