frontloading test e

[jfalco]

dont bother.

Could you eloborate on this? Never heard this before. I am a noob, only 1 cycle. I was planning on frontloading my next cycle. The logic behind it seems very reasonable. If you're running 500ml/wk that's only two 2ml shots for the first 2 weeks. Seems easy enough to me. Only costs you an extra 4mls of gear - less than half a bottle.

So is what you are saying that the benifits of front loading aren't worth 30 bucks?

[TITANIUM]

Could you eloborate on this? Never heard this before. I am a noob, only 1 cycle. I was planning on frontloading my next cycle. The logic behind it seems very reasonable. If you're running 500ml/wk that's only two 2ml shots for the first 2 weeks. Seems easy enough to me. Only costs you an extra 4mls of gear - less than half a bottle.

So is what you are saying that the benifits of front loading aren't worth 30 bucks?

He's saying that you won't benefit from it.

This guy is only running test by itself.

So, it would be pointless to front load on this particular cycle.

Best

T

[C-MaN]

exactly.. he should spend that extra 30 bucks on an oral to kick it off....

[JiGGaMaN]

Could you eloborate on this? Never heard this before. I am a noob, only 1 cycle. I was planning on frontloading my next cycle. The logic behind it seems very reasonable. If you're running 500ml/wk that's only two 2ml shots for the first 2 weeks. Seems easy enough to me. Only costs you an extra 4mls of gear - less than half a bottle.

So is what you are saying that the benifits of front loading aren't worth 30 bucks?

thats not how it works in real life. since no one on the board (including myself) is scientifically competent, we can only speculate for the most part. i mean, couldnt you then just inject the whole bottle on the first day and it would kick in right then and there?