data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1086/c1086eb63cabf9928fc4abe746e5dc1658a44af3" alt="Quote"
Originally Posted by
Times Roman
no doubt auto insurance is profitable. and in california, it's required by law.
I am waiting for the day when your premium will also be based on how many "proven" miles you drive. Think of a device hooked to your odometer somehow that will provide a variable insurance policy. If you do not drive the vehicle one month, then the premium should be very very low (it could still be stolen, so the theft premium would not be variable mile based)
there is a proven statistical correlation between bad credit and driving risk. Maybe not true for any given individual, but over a population, the correlation is undeniable.
Let's look at the highschool drop out thing. But let's spin it around and look at it assbackwards. It is very common for professionals with college degrees to get substantial discounts on their auto policies. Why? Again, there is a statistical correlation between that group and lower driving risk. People in this category, statistically, have invested more heavily in themselves and their career, and they have more to lose, which means they have more to protect. They are typically homeowners, which also means more stability and less risk. Compared to this group, highschool dropouts have not invested much in themselves or their careers, and they have less to lose, and therefore less to protect. Highschool dropouts, as a demographic, are less likely to be homeowners than the general population.
Now, if you were the insurer, who would you rather insure? The professional with the college degree, or the highschool dropout?