cycle duration

[Emerald]

The pro or advanced BB seems to be using the 8 week on 8 week off model, not that this a new strategy, but one I want to discuss. With current science suggesting that little significant gains are made after the 8th week resulting in a waste of money and un-needed stress to the body systems. First, do you agree with this and second: if you go to an 8week cycle doesn't that limit your choices to short ester AAS? My mentor is a firm believer but I want an un biased view, thanks.

[Gaspaco]

All depends on ester!

LOOK!

Test e 12week(kicks in week 4-6) = 8-10weeks including clearing the este until PCT start!

Test prop 8weeks = 8weeks of cycle

Everybody is different but after 8weeks the gains start to hinder - not worth the sides!

[Gaspaco]

All depends on ester!

LOOK!

Test e 12week(kicks in week 4-6) = 8-10weeks including clearing the este until PCT start!

Test prop 8weeks = 8weeks of cycle

Every body is different but after 8weeks the gains start to hinder - not worth the sides!

YES! Short cycles = short esters

[marcus300]

I agree shorter cycles are far better for gains, sides and also maintenance. You can run long ester in a short cycle but your always better keeping it simple so just go with shorter esters

[Emerald]

Exactly. Thanks

[Turkish Juicer]

I have been refusing to run cycles that are longer than 8 weeks long for a while; I get less sides, equally decent gains and overall feel better about not staying on the juice for 12 weeks or longer.

My last burst cycle lasted for 6 weeks during which I blasted 3 different AAS and without the use of any peptides, I managed to add LBM and a decrement in BF%. Note that Tren wasn't involved, neither was non-steroidal ancillaries often used for cutting such as ECA, Clen, Ephedrine and etc.

Note that those who are both educated and experienced in the game will indeed benefit the most from burst cycles, as burst cycles are not for newbies.

[Dave11]

I know this was posted a long time ago but why are burst cycles not for first timers please explain thanx dave

[marcus300]

I know this was posted a long time ago but why are burst cycles not for first timers please explain thanx dave

Depends on what you mean by burst cycle?

[MickeyKnox]

I agree shorter cycles are far better for gains, sides and also maintenance. You can run long ester in a short cycle but your always better keeping it simple so just go with shorter esters

I have been refusing to run cycles that are longer than 8 weeks long for a while; I get less sides, equally decent gains and overall feel better about not staying on the juice for 12 weeks or longer.

My last burst cycle lasted for 6 weeks during which I blasted 3 different AAS and without the use of any peptides, I managed to add LBM and a decrement in BF%. Note that Tren wasn't involved, neither was non-steroidal ancillaries often used for cutting such as ECA, Clen, Ephedrine and etc.

Note that those who are both educated and experienced in the game will indeed benefit the most from burst cycles, as burst cycles are not for newbies.

Agreed! ^^

I know this was posted a long time ago but why are burst cycles not for first timers please explain thanx dave

Short Burst Cycling- Explained

http://forums.steroid.com/showthread...=#.UMIlnqzX_fs