Results 1 to 40 of 44

Thread: tren worries

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    2,110
    I can see why people have reacted like this due to your complete lack of education on what you are doing, and the fact that you began using aas when you really should not have been.

    However I do see alot of people getting flamed for being " too small for aas," every body type is different, bone density, bone structure ect, in his profile he is apparently 7%bf if I remember correctly, which most here haven't and may never achieve.

    I would like to refer to a member by the name of sonson who posted a thread yesterday

    http://forums.steroid.com/showthread...d-Tren-A-cycle

    Ok I understand this guy is 2" shorter than the op here, they are both apparently carrying similar bf in fact the op is slight lower "apparently", and slightly heavier "apparently".
    I strongly believe if sonson had not posted pics in his original post he would have got written off for being "too small" and have no business playing with tren or any aas for that matter and should "learn to eat".. However as he included pictures, anyone who read and responded were blown away with his physique myself personally, i believe it was one of the best physiques I've seen posted here IMO..

    So this may or may not be the case here but please do not be so quick to judge. Every body is different..and to categories everyone into the same rule of stats is ridiculous.
    Hopefully not stepping on too many toes here.
    I'm not saying this is, or isn't the case in this situation. But drawing a line in the sand saying you should be this weight/height is ridiculous, as everybody is built different and stats really don't paint a true picture..

    Op I suggest posting pictures to justify your aas use if you want to be taken seriously..
    Last edited by auswest; 03-24-2013 at 07:20 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    Quote Originally Posted by auswest View Post
    I can see why people have reacted like this due to your complete lack of education on what you are doing, and the fact that you began using aas when you really should not have been.

    However I do see alot of people getting flamed for being " too small for aas," every body type is different, bone density, bone structure ect, in his profile he is apparently 7%bf if I remember correctly, which most here haven't and may never achieve.

    I would like to refer to a member by the name of sonson who posted a thread yesterday

    http://forums.steroid.com/showthread...d-Tren-A-cycle

    Ok I understand this guy is 2" shorter than the op here, they are both apparently carrying similar bf in fact the op is slight lower "apparently", and slightly heavier "apparently".
    I strongly believe if sonson had not posted pics in his original post he would have got written off for being "too small" and have no business playing with tren or any aas for that matter and should "learn to eat".. However as he included pictures, anyone who read and responded were blown away with his physique myself personally, i believe it was one of the best physiques I've seen posted here IMO..

    So this may or may not be the case here but please do not be so quick to judge. Every body is different..and to categories everyone into the same rule of stats is ridiculous.
    Hopefully not stepping on too many toes here.
    I'm not saying this is, or isn't the case in this situation. But drawing a line in the sand saying you should be this weight/height is ridiculous, as everybody is built different and stats really don't paint a true picture..

    Op I suggest posting pictures to justify your aas use if you want to be taken seriously..
    Nope, not buying it - not even for a New York second.

    First off, i assure you i would NOT have cried foul at SonSons stats. I have a clear grasp of what 5'5" 170lbs looks like, especially at 8% BF.

    Secondly, there is a HUGE difference between 5'5" @ 170lbs 8% BF and a guy who began cycling at 125lbs and has three cycles under his belt yet still only weighs 155lbs at 5 ft 7". C'mon man. If those aren't two red flags, what is??

    You keep saying everyone is different. Of course everyone is different. But stats tell the tale of the tape bro - that's why they are so important. And with these stats I know for a FACT the OP is lost when it come to eating properly. Thats my point, and i think i made it clear based upon the FACTS and STATS in this thread.

    Other than that, i love ya bro.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    2,110
    Quote Originally Posted by MickeyKnox

    Nope, not buying it - not even for a New York second.

    First off, i assure you i would NOT have cried foul at SonSons stats. I have a clear grasp of what 5'5" 170lbs looks like, especially at 8% BF.

    Secondly, there is a HUGE difference between 5'5" @ 170lbs 8% BF and a guy who began cycling at 125lbs and has three cycles under his belt yet still only weighs 155lbs at 5 ft 7". C'mon man. If those aren't two red flags, what is??

    You keep saying everyone is different. Of course everyone is different. But stats tell the tale of the tape bro - that's why they are so important. And with these stats I know for a FACT the OP is lost when it come to eating properly. Thats my point, and i think i made it clear based upon the FACTS and STATS in this thread.

    Other than that, i love ya bro.
    Read sonson's thread properly brother he's walking around at 152 and hopes to be 160-170 AFTER test and tren cycle...
    Stats don't always paint a true picture

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    2,110
    However I honestly believe in the importance of pictures in a thread like this...shall we leave it at stats can be sometimes misleading?

    I have mentioned this may not be the case here as it is clear there are other issues, but I did notice this thread turn into a bit of a flame at the op a little to quickly



    This is nothing against you btw mickey you do a great job here
    Last edited by auswest; 03-24-2013 at 09:23 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    13,200
    Quote Originally Posted by auswest View Post
    Read sonson's thread properly brother he's walking around at 152 and hopes to be 160-170 AFTER test and tren cycle...
    Stats don't always paint a true picture
    I misunderstood, i thought he was "walking around at 170." I stand corrected.

    I still maintain my position on the OP however.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    2,110
    Quote Originally Posted by MickeyKnox

    I misunderstood, i thought he was "walking around at 170." I stand corrected.

    I still maintain my position on the OP however.
    I don't disagree,

    But notice how you mistook a 150lb guy for a 170lb guy, stats do not always paint a true picture..

    As far as this guy goes, pictures are obviously warranted, and obviously diet and training should always be the first thing knocked on the head, without it aas are useless.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •