Results 1 to 38 of 38

Thread: Total test levels only 2723

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Numbers are fine for prop. Please do not run 25mg of aromasin for an extended period. 25mg is the standard dose for metastatic breast cancer in adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and first line settings as a doublet to chemotherapy. 12.5mg/day is sufficient. 25mg/d is abusive.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Micanopy/Gainesville, Fl
    Posts
    5,868
    Quote Originally Posted by MuscleInk View Post
    Numbers are fine for prop. Please do not run 25mg of aromasin for an extended period. 25mg is the standard dose for metastatic breast cancer in adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and first line settings as a doublet to chemotherapy. 12.5mg/day is sufficient. 25mg/d is abusive.
    .....................

    Can I ask how you guys feel about not getting the male sensitive assay when looking at our Estradiol test. ??? ...crazy mike

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    206
    Quote Originally Posted by MuscleInk View Post
    Numbers are fine for prop. Please do not run 25mg of aromasin for an extended period. 25mg is the standard dose for metastatic breast cancer in adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and first line settings as a doublet to chemotherapy. 12.5mg/day is sufficient. 25mg/d is abusive.
    at 12.5 my e was way too high. Austinite says 25 mg is the standard dose. And cm the female hormonal panel has been suggested by many members here and in stickies I'm not cutting corners it is accurate
    Last edited by Whiteboyy0; 08-21-2013 at 01:42 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Whiteboyy0
    at 12.5 my e was way too high. Austinite says 25 mg is the standard dose. And cm the female hormonal panel has been suggested by many members here and in stickies I'm not cutting corners it is accurate
    I respect Austinite and his contributions to the forum, however, speaking from a professional point of view and someone who uses AIs frequently in a clinical setting, 25mg PO qd for an extended period is unnecessary. I believe you stated your E2 was 52 (which is NOT high) but an incorrect assay may have been performed. Controlling E2 is critical for numerous reasons I have covered before (as have other respected members) but all too often, naive users wrongly believe more is better and safe. Untrue. At 25mg PO qd, there are several common side effects that you simply do not need to endure.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    206
    Quote Originally Posted by MuscleInk View Post
    I respect Austinite and his contributions to the forum, however, speaking from a professional point of view and someone who uses AIs frequently in a clinical setting, 25mg PO qd for an extended period is unnecessary. I believe you stated your E2 was 52 (which is NOT high) but an incorrect assay may have been performed. Controlling E2 is critical for numerous reasons I have covered before (as have other respected members) but all too often, naive users wrongly believe more is better and safe. Untrue. At 25mg PO qd, there are several common side effects that you simply do not need to endure.
    thanks for bringing this up though I have been thinking of switching to liquid adex for a few reasons. 52 was high for me though I couldn't get a boner. Limped out on 2 girls 2 days in a row haven't talked to them since lol. Do you think adex is a better ai then, efficiency and safety wise?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    L.A
    Posts
    24,628
    Quote Originally Posted by Whiteboyy0
    thanks for bringing this up though I have been thinking of switching to liquid adex for a few reasons. 52 was high for me though I couldn't get a boner. Limped out on 2 girls 2 days in a row haven't talked to them since lol. Do you think adex is a better ai then, efficiency and safety wise?
    52 does not seem high for how high your testosterone levels are?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    206
    Quote Originally Posted by jim230027 View Post
    52 does not seem high for how high your testosterone levels are?
    Maybe mikes right then, the results might not be accurate for e2 levels. I've seen it recommended on here though. Once I upped my dosage though I started getting wood again. E2 levels were 57. Not that that would change much
    Last edited by Whiteboyy0; 08-21-2013 at 02:52 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    A rock & a hard place
    Posts
    13,447
    Quote Originally Posted by Whiteboyy0
    thanks for bringing this up though I have been thinking of switching to liquid adex for a few reasons. 52 was high for me though I couldn't get a boner. Limped out on 2 girls 2 days in a row haven't talked to them since lol. Do you think adex is a better ai then, efficiency and safety wise?
    Safer? That's not easy to answer. Adex works a little quicker and has a longer half life than aromasin but some published papers report a greater negative impact on lipids (cholesterol) with adex compared to aromasin.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •