
Originally Posted by
thegodfather
My issue is the unequal application and enforcement of the laws here. If he wanted to arrest her for failure to obey a lawful order (to disperse) he was within the law to do so. However, the girl was following his command and dispersing. An officer should never arrest someone because he feels "disrespected," he has no right to not have his feelings hurt, and even less so as a public servant. Whether or not you get arrested should NEVER depend on your 'attitude,' and should ONLY be dependent on the FACTS of a contact. 'Respecting your elders,' and this other nonsense is inconsequential.
With that being said, even though the decision to arrest her was not justified, once he made the decision to do so, and issued the command that she was under arrest, it was her obligation to comply. Because of qualified immunity and good faith, even though his arrest was unlawful, his order was not, and therefore should have been obeyed, and she did resist arrest (a lawful command).
So, lets only look at these videos through a legal framework, and please leave the platitudes and offended sensibilities for your backyard BBQ's.