Something I was thinking about for my website

[SS1476]

i wonder who's fault it is that this thread turned into such a debacle.....??? isnt it AMAZING that every time a thread takes a turn for the worse and people start public mud slinging, it is always the same "certain somebody" "pushing buttons" and starting trouble

The good thing out of this Doc is
that many will take notice of this.

[BG]

i wonder who's fault it is that this thread turned into such a debacle.....??? isnt it AMAZING that every time a thread takes a turn for the worse and people start public mud slinging, it is always the same "certain somebody" "pushing buttons" and starting trouble

Brings everything into perspective.

[Doc.Sust]

The good thing out of this Doc is
that many will take notice of this.

i already thought this was common knowledege on the board because of the wonderful doings in the HGH forum and also the insightful blog acusations of other mods sourcing.none of this is new,same old crap, from the same person.but it does reinforce what i already thought was common knowledge and hopefuly showed a few others if they didnt already know

[Doc.Sust]

since the thread is getting alot of attention, anyone care to see a man deadlift a 1003lbs? it is more educational than this bull crap thread
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAiUTF6DC8M

[pigrond]

imo and it is my opinion the source checker is a good idea i currently have a good .com source that has not scammed me or my freinds yet but they are pricey and im too scared to try anyone else until i have to .ive got 4 freinds that use aas including myself and we goto 3 diffrent gyms (we go each to our own gym)and have yet to meet anyone willing to supply thjere just arent many people i guess around our part of town into what we do so a legit check on a .com is great news for those that have to do it again just my opinion

[Property of Steroid.com]

I think it's important to bring things into the public's attention. Too many people think that all the "Good Bros" are only trying to help, or whatever...when in reality this board has had several soucres and scammers on staff, who used their position to rip the members off.


It's funny how everytime I bring this kind of thing to light publicly, the current staff gets all upset. I wonder how upset the members were 2 years ago when a mod here on steroid.com ripped them off of Ten grand?

[Property of Steroid.com]

imo and it is my opinion the source checker is a good idea i currently have a good .com source that has not scammed me or my freinds yet but they are pricey and im too scared to try anyone else until i have to .ive got 4 freinds that use aas including myself and we goto 3 diffrent gyms (we go each to our own gym)and have yet to meet anyone willing to supply thjere just arent many people i guess around our part of town into what we do so a legit check on a .com is great news for those that have to do it again just my opinion

I'm checking with my IT guys right now and trying to see when I can have it up and running. I'll have an answer tomorrow I think....

[BG]

imo and it is my opinion the source checker is a good idea i currently have a good .com source that has not scammed me or my freinds yet but they are pricey and im too scared to try anyone else until i have to .ive got 4 freinds that use aas including myself and we goto 3 diffrent gyms (we go each to our own gym)and have yet to meet anyone willing to supply thjere just arent many people i guess around our part of town into what we do so a legit check on a .com is great news for those that have to do it again just my opinion

How do you know its going to be legit? Because its on the list, well maybe you wont get scammed but could be underdosed but it wouldnt matter right, its on the list. You need to find a good ugl, test their gear randomly, let them know you test it, build a relationship and you'll be set. Your stupid by going on one mans word, I never would unless I knew them very well.

[Doc.Sust]

I think it's important to bring things into the public's attention. Too many people think that all the "Good Bros" are only trying to help, or whatever...when in reality this board has had several soucres and scammers on staff, who used their position to rip the members off.


It's funny how everytime I bring this kind of thing to light publicly, the current staff gets all upset. I wonder how upset the members were 2 years ago when a mod here on steroid.com ripped them off of Ten grand?

SO ................are you denying the alllegations of yourself being a selective zebra scammer!?!?!?!LOL! the people have a right to know!!

PLEASE!!!! since when have you ever been intrested in the peoples best intrest??you have said it in so many words so many times, that you dont do crap unless it brings a cash flow to you. are people suposed to think that YOU of all people are a so called "good bro" and they could trust you???GET REAL! you tell me why you think people would or could actualy believe that you wouldnt play favorites for YOUR source checks???

[Property of Steroid.com]

How do you know its going to be legit? Because its on the list, well maybe you wont get scammed but could be underdosed but it wouldnt matter right, its on the list. You need to find a good ugl, test their gear randomly, let them know you test it, build a relationship and you'll be set. Your stupid by going on one mans word, I never would unless I knew them very well.

Hopefully my sourcecheck feature will be used as part of someone's investigation into the legitimacy of a given source, and not the whole investivgation. It should provide a useful, anonymous (*and free) way to get information on whether a source has proven to be good in the past.

[Doc.Sust]

How do you know its going to be legit? Because its on the list, well maybe you wont get scammed but could be underdosed but it wouldnt matter right, its on the list. You need to find a good ugl, test their gear randomly, let them know you test it, build a relationship and you'll be set. Your stupid by going on one mans word, I never would unless I knew them very well.

EXACTLY!

[Property of Steroid.com]

you tell me why you think people would or could actualy believe that you wouldnt play favorites for YOUR source checks???

Why would I have favorites? I use Oasis Rejuvination for my anabolics....

I'm currently compiling a list of the first 50 sources who are going to be on the list...I don't even know some of them, I'm just going on my reader feedback. I know the major sources, but most of these little ones...I can't even begin to tell you how many sources I haven't heard of....I'm far from playin favorites...i don't even know these guys personally, in some cases...I'm just going off feedback from different people I know, who have agreed to help me.

[Doc.Sust]

Hopefully my sourcecheck feature will be used as part of someone's investigation into the legitimacy of a given source, and not the whole investivgation. It should provide a useful, anonymous (*and free) way to get information on whether a source has proven to be good in the past.

or help get a source busted for posting info on an open website.great idea

[BG]

It just seems to easily taintable, just like with MB, people were faking being scammed so that their competitors would end up on the scammers list. What if this happened in reverse on your site? Just a quick question.......whats your stock in this?

[BG]

or help get a source busted for posting info on an open website.great idea

I never even thought of that, with the amount of open sources being busted daily.

[Doc.Sust]

Why would I have favorites?

two words.......KICK BACKS!

you accuse the mods of taking kick backs, and being biased to sources that"hook them up" who is to say the same cant be said for you? for a little extra cash, maybe they could be put at the top of your list.it could be exactly the same. y would anyone believe you were doing this out of the goodness of your heart whan you have repeatedly stated multiple times that money is your first and foremost priority?

[Property of Steroid.com]

It's not a list. It's an open field with nothing in it, where you can type in the E-Mail address of a source, and it'll tell you if they've been ok in the past according to feedback I've gotten, or if I've never heard of them personally.

There's not going to be "posting" of any sources or scammers...you need to have the address first in order to check it. Same as any sourcecheck on any board.

[pigrond]

How do you know its going to be legit? Because its on the list, well maybe you wont get scammed but could be underdosed but it wouldnt matter right, its on the list. You need to find a good ugl, test their gear randomly, let them know you test it, build a relationship and you'll be set. Your stupid by going on one mans word, I never would unless I knew them very well.

point well taken but like i said my only option now is .com until that day i find a good ugl .and right now i got no bodys word on any .com being good or bad at least it would be starting point .i get yoour point 100 percent bro and as newb im not taking sides either way im just looking for help in my personal quest of gettin large

[Property of Steroid.com]

two words.......KICK BACKS!

you accuse the mods of taking kick backs, and being biased to sources that"hook them up" who is to say the same cant be said for you? for a little extra cash, maybe they could be put at the top of your list.it could be exactly the same. y would anyone believe you were doing this out of the goodness of your heart whan you have repeatedly stated multiple times that money is your first and foremost priority?

Actually, what I'm banking on is more traffic for my site, not money. More Traffic is good, because it gets more people reading my stuff, and the more people read my stuff the more people will be interested in me and my projects. I'm not taking any money to put anybody on the list...it's free to be on, and it's free to access.

[SS1476]

point well taken but like i said my only option now is .com until that day i find a good ugl .and right now i got no bodys word on any .com being good or bad at least it would be starting point .i get yoour point 100 percent bro and as newb im not taking sides either way im just looking for help in my personal quest of gettin large

No offence to you...
let the parties involved post.

This is also fishing in this thread.

[Doc.Sust]

It's not a list. It's an open field with nothing in it, where you can type in the E-Mail address of a source, and it'll tell you if they've been ok in the past according to feedback I've gotten, or if I've never heard of them personally.

There's not going to be "posting" of any sources or scammers...you need to have the address first in order to check it. Same as any sourcecheck on any board.

i cant believe i am saying this, but that isnt that bad of an idea, BUT it certainly does leave you with a HELL of alot of power to make or break sources for whatever reasons you feel

[pigrond]

No offence to you...
let the parties involved post.

This is also fishing in this thread.

sorry it was not my intent to fish just trying get my point of view across ive said enuff

[BG]

sorry it was not my intent to fish just trying get my point of view across ive said enuff

No biggie buddy, stick around you'll find a good one with time.

[Property of Steroid.com]

i cant believe i am saying this, but that isnt that bad of an idea, BUT it certainly does leave you with a HELL of alot of power to make or break sources for whatever reasons you feel

It's not a bad idea. Exposure translates to more sales, and the better my site is, the more sales I will eventually get.

When I write, I want two things:

1. Exposure
2. Money

If I can't get both, then I want one of them in larger amounts. I write "creative" (Ad-copy) for more than one site right now, under other people's name(s). In that case, I earn more money, because my writing gets edited and turned into somebody elses article. In the case of my own site, I'm offering all of the information for free, because the exposure is commesurate with the return on investment (ROI) I'll get. I wrote all of the AAS profiles for Isteroids, as well as steroidsprofiles...but my name isn't on any of them, to my knowledge...so in that case it was money. Here on steroid.com, I get tons of exposure, and so when I write, I can do it for less than I do for other sites....the exposure is worth it.

As for making or breaking sources....I don't know if this really helps me more in that respect than the amount of influence I already have. I try to stay primarily out of that world, because the ROI isn't there...free gear and free hook-ups on stuff like that isn't something I need now that I'm on HRT. And in order to make my source-check feature popular, I can't play favorites, because that will reduce the value of it, and a reduction in it's value will reduce the exposure it gets...so it's counter productive for me to play favorites in that respect.

Look at it logically, and you'll see that in order for my idea to produce a favorable ROI for me, I have to play it straight. Think about it.

It just seems to easily taintable, just like with MB, people were faking being scammed so that their competitors would end up on the scammers list. What if this happened in reverse on your site? Just a quick question.......whats your stock in this?

I suppose it's possible to have things go wrong. But if I get a bunch of e-mails from people I never heard of, claiming that a source is bad, then obviously I'll have to check into it, and see where they are members, etc...

It'll take work, for sure. Right now, I have 30 names on the list, and am going to aim for 50 before it's up and running.

[Property of Steroid.com]

Here's one of the touchy subjects I was thinking about. A certain ug (I************ P**************) was producing B****** D***** counterfeits, as well as fake QV and sustanon. But they had real steroids in them and were properly dosed. The question is, do I list someone like that as legit or not? Because their products were all delivered, and they didn't scam...they just weren 't genuine.

That's kind of a philosophical question, I suppose...

[Swifto]

If there not genuine, there not a legit source IMHO.

[almostgone]

Here's one of the touchy subjects I was thinking about. A certain ug (I************ P**************) was producing B****** D***** counterfeits, as well as fake QV and sustanon. But they had real steroids in them and were properly dosed. The question is, do I list someone like that as legit or not? Because their products were all delivered, and they didn't scam...they just weren 't genuine.

That's kind of a philosophical question, I suppose...

There's no "was" to it. It's still going on full blast.

AG

[Property of Steroid.com]

There's no "was" to it. It's still going on full blast.

AG

Well...I said "was" because they "were" doing it w/o people knowing it (I knew about the sustanon thing about a year ago, and the QV thing as well). I think everyone knows about the counterfeit issue now...so I guess I put it in past tense because they aren't getting one over anymore...

I suppose they're still doing it, but now they are doing it with everyone knowing...so it's not so much "tricking" people anymore...just producing clones.

They were doing it with Rolexes too....selling fake Rollies on their site...which, you have to admit, everyone must have known were fake....

[305GUY]

Here's one of the touchy subjects I was thinking about. A certain ug (I************ P**************) was producing B****** D***** counterfeits, as well as fake QV and sustanon. But they had real steroids in them and were properly dosed. The question is, do I list someone like that as legit or not? Because their products were all delivered, and they didn't scam...they just weren 't genuine.

That's kind of a philosophical question, I suppose...

I would say yes, you list them as legit. They make clear on their lists that the certain items are "knockoffs" of the originals, and they do carry items that are legit as well. I personally would never touch their oils due to their problems over a year or so ago, but i do have some tabs that are good to go. As well as their remailers are approved on other boards with members giving them good ratings. Including a rating feedback/rating section on your site would be most beneficial with the source checker.

[Property of Steroid.com]

I'm up to 40 e-mail addresses right now. As soon as I get ten more and confirmation from multiple people that they're legit, I'll have the IT guys for my site working on putting the feature up.

I'm thinking that it's an easy way for people who don't want to do a sourcecheck themselves to avoid it...just link to the page of my site with the sourcecheck feature.

I'll probably put up a post about it in the mod forum of EF, and see if any of them want to contribute to get me the last 10 addies I need....

[guest589745]

Eh, nevermind. Edit.

[shrpskn]

......

[broken7]

What ever happened with this ?

[ecto9]

Anthony, I'm interested in this too. I see the thread is nearly 1yr old. Did you decide against this idea? Been to your website.