if im correct these 2 products r claiming to do the same thing, Ive used No2 and it sucked, i saw n felt no results, which of these 2 is better, ne one know?
Anabolic Member
if im correct these 2 products r claiming to do the same thing, Ive used No2 and it sucked, i saw n felt no results, which of these 2 is better, ne one know?
Senior Member
if you did not like no2 then you will not like pump tech as it is the same thing. No xplode is a lil different but nothing drastic
Senior Member
i used no explod and loved it.....and if you stack it with cell mass its supposed to be sick!
Senior Member
i am about to do that mass stack by bsn just cause i had some extra cash. well let yall know how it does
Anabolic Member
aboslutly msn, def keep up posted on it, is cell mass a creatine???
Senior Member
yea cell mass is creatine, its CEE
Anabolic Member
yea i just looked it up, not a bad combo, someone should now stack cell-tech with pump-tech and see which one is better. I just read all the user reviews on cell-mass and arent so hot. keep us posted, maybe a cheaper CEE would be jsut as good
Last edited by Machdiesel; 04-21-2005 at 01:06 PM.
Senior Member
where did you read the reviews at??/? i have heard good things about it.
Senior Member
I've heard both good and bad reviews althought I have yet to try CEE.
Anabolic Member
seems like no xplode is the real deal, but cell mass can easily be switched with a cheaper cee
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
396 Pages of Anabolic Steroid resources, techniques and facts. Discover the best types of Steroids to use to reach specific goals and outcomes.
Reply With Quote