muscle tech? any good?

**d2000honda** · 03-14-2006, 04:37 PM

What's best? Muslce Tech or what else is out there thats more affective.

**stocky121** · 03-14-2006, 04:44 PM

muscle tech = over priced

**Bojangles69** · 03-14-2006, 04:51 PM

Originally Posted by stocky121

muscle tech = over priced

true that, but they do have some decent products.

**Pro_built7** · 03-14-2006, 07:11 PM

ba haha don't buy muscletech. overpriced and overhyped.

**Testsubject** · 03-15-2006, 02:00 AM

muscletech makes some of the best products around, IMO. Overpriced? Ya, maybe a little but who the hell cares, at least your getting something that you know is gonna work.

**Warrior** · 03-15-2006, 04:42 AM

Originally Posted by Testsubject

muscletech makes some of the best products around, IMO. Overpriced? Ya, maybe a little but who the hell cares, at least your getting something that you know is gonna work.

I concur...

***Giantz11*** · 03-15-2006, 06:45 AM

Originally Posted by Testsubject

muscletech makes some of the best products around, IMO. Overpriced? Ya, maybe a little but who the hell cares, at least your getting something that you know is gonna work.

You ain' paying more for the product, you're paying for marketing.

What do they make that's good anyways?

**Testsubject** · 03-15-2006, 10:34 AM

Originally Posted by Giantz11

You ain' paying more for the product, you're paying for marketing.

What do they make that's good anyways?

Well whatever is it, you know what Im sayin'. Celltech's good, their monohydrate (when they made it)was good, Gakic, hydroxycut, acetabolan 2, Ive tried all that shit, loved it all. Celltech is killer if you ask me, mix it with some vanilla protein powder and youve got a creamsicle.

**Hackamaniac** · 03-15-2006, 10:37 AM

overrated for sure

**Testsubject** · 03-15-2006, 10:37 AM

............I just cant get over the fact of how many people sit there a diss muscletech. I bet 90% of the people that diss muscletech aint never even tried any products made by them. It seems like what ever bandwagon is the fullest people want to jump on. I dont get it

**Pro_built7** · 03-15-2006, 10:44 AM

I paid 60$ more for cell-tech just to find out the cheaper stuff works just as well.

**pelly789** · 03-15-2006, 10:53 AM

cell tech is garbage just like about 75% of mainstream products are like nitro tech and animal pak stuff you can definatly find better prices with equal or better results your paying for all of there ads in all the magazines thats what it comes down to and 60$ for cell tech? what did you get the 2.2 lbs or something that was a rip off i did the same thing but paid 40 instead and it doesnt work too well either

**Warrior** · 03-15-2006, 11:19 AM

Originally Posted by Testsubject

Well whatever is it, you know what Im sayin'. Celltech's good, their monohydrate (when they made it)was good, Gakic, hydroxycut, acetabolan 2, Ive tried all that shit, loved it all. Celltech is killer if you ask me, mix it with some vanilla protein powder and youve got a creamsicle.

Dude - when that Acetabolan II came out - I did really well on that... think I was about 19 years old at the time. Bck when Creatine was more expensive then crack! But hell, I think MuscleTech was one of those companies gettin' their sups tested for oral AAS back in the day (Cybergenics for something, Hotstuff for oral test, EAS for clen , and I think MuscleTech for an oral test)... if they are kind enough to splip a little sumin-sumin in their sups - thanks guys!

**Undecided09** · 03-15-2006, 03:17 PM

Muscletech=All Advertising

MRI (Medical Research Institute)=All Research (they sell themselves)

P.S. Why do you think cell tech tastes so good, SUGAR HIGH.....I got off of it because it isnt real size, it doesn't enter your cell, it creates a edema and swelling takes your from a 1 to a 10, and when your off u drop to a 2

CE2 from MRI takes you from a 1-10 and when your off you drop to a 7 or 8, its significant..Real Mass or Fake Mass??? Which do you prefer??

**d2000honda** · 03-15-2006, 03:30 PM

thanks everyone for the answers. You guys helped alot

**Warrior** · 03-15-2006, 11:38 PM

Originally Posted by Undecided09

Muscletech=All Advertising

MRI (Medical Research Institute)=All Research (they sell themselves)

P.S. Why do you think cell tech tastes so good, SUGAR HIGH.....I got off of it because it isnt real size, it doesn't enter your cell, it creates a edema and swelling takes your from a 1 to a 10, and when your off u drop to a 2

CE2 from MRI takes you from a 1-10 and when your off you drop to a 7 or 8, its significant..Real Mass or Fake Mass??? Which do you prefer??

And the problem with dextrose is what again?

If you don't want sugar, then don't buy Cell Tech... that is for sure. If you want the dextrose - then it is an option. Seems sugar has become such a taboo thing these days - like fat was in the 70's and 80's. There are times when you need a fast acting carb (glycogen supercompensation) - and the dextrose in Cell Tech is a quality source.

**kaptainkeezy04** · 03-15-2006, 11:44 PM

if yall want cheaper nitro tech or cee pro, just go to wal mart and buy six star brand...its all IOVATE products so im sure its the same. muscletech is a good brand if money is not an option.

**Undecided09** · 03-16-2006, 12:02 AM

I never said dextrose was bad, but if i remember correctly, and i THink I do 75 GRAMS OF SUGAR per serving is way to much dextrose in one sitting, especially post lift, I mean yeah you do need to replenish your glycogen stores, but your trying to replenish those stores and not exceed them to prevent glycogen stores being converted to fat...well whatever, its not worth arguing over, I like esterfied creatine more specifically CE2, and you like Cell-tech, whatever works, I just stopped using it becaues they drive the creatine through your system with sugar and I don't need that much...

**Warrior** · 03-16-2006, 12:16 AM

Originally Posted by Undecided09

I never said dextrose was bad, but if i remember correctly, and i THink I do 75 GRAMS OF SUGAR per serving is way to much dextrose in one sitting, especially post lift, I mean yeah you do need to replenish your glycogen stores, but your trying to replenish those stores and not exceed them to prevent glycogen stores being converted to fat...well whatever, its not worth arguing over, I like esterfied creatine more specifically CE2, and you like Cell-tech, whatever works, I just stopped using it becaues they drive the creatine through your system with sugar and I don't need that much...

I am not argueing with ya at all dude... but I am currently using it to Carb load once a week and it fills me right out. It looks like a great thing to use after about 10IU of slin too though I have yet to run any slin with it... but again, it's totally goal dependent, lose fat, gain mass, strength... carb loading... factors in it all...

I agree though - for many people, it probably is too much dextrose/sugar... just depends on what you want to use it for...

Anyway... I don't look at brand names... I look at ingredients and known quality of the products (like from big companies with lots to lose), and MuscleTech has provided some good blends and top quality stuff for me... I am not trying to under cut the industry and get some basement-quality sups at a bargain price... I'll gladly hand over my money based on two things: Does it have the ingredients I want? Do I know the company produces quality products?

**Undecided09** · 03-16-2006, 12:39 AM

No i know were not arguing, but i was preventing it heading to a pointless debate, but I agree about the money is worth the product. I hate to keep harping about CE2 and MRI, but Ed Byrd invented creatine and if he says that this new supplement is his best and the best, then I have to believe it. Yeah i understand advertising, but I mean the guy invented the stuff for God Sake, haha, he knows what works and what doesnt...MRI does provide quality products because all their money goes toward research, their isnt a company that puts more science into their product than MRI, their prodcuts sells themselves...The Research to Advertising Ration of a companies spending is key....

**MFT81** · 03-16-2006, 02:13 PM

Originally Posted by Undecided09

their prodcuts sells themselves...The Research to Advertising Ration of a companies spending is key....

There products dont sell themselves, people like me that work at health food stores do.

Between reading this thread and the other in which you tried to out piss another member on ester vs monohydrate shows me that you are just like all the other people that I have to talk out of buying crap like muscle tech and MRI, You've got to remember that Ed Byrd is a SALESMAN dude, and thats it.

Everyone has there own brand, And now matter how much hype there is, the truth is in the Nutrition Facts on the back of the label. CAVEAT EMPTOR!

**firmechicano831** · 03-16-2006, 04:43 PM

Over priced but does work.

**Bojangles69** · 03-16-2006, 08:55 PM

muscletechs nortestan and anotestan rocked, many other frontline supps were tested for % of actual diol in thier product and musletech was amongst the best. Expensive-yes, quality-yes.