Thread: How Does Cell-tech Compare...
-
08-21-2003, 01:38 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- LOUISIANA
- Posts
- 10
How Does Cell-tech Compare...
How Does Cell-tech Compare To Some Of The Other Supplements Out There? Price-wise, Effectiveness, Etc...?
-
08-21-2003, 02:01 PM #2Junior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Posts
- 112
Cell tech is overpriced creatine, ala, and dextrose. Check out the post I made about making your own.
-
08-21-2003, 07:02 PM #3
There is a good product out there called Trans-X. Its got 86 grams of dextrose and 17 grams of creatine a serving. Also has other amino'... glutamine,arganine
-
08-21-2003, 10:51 PM #4
Celltech is overpriced, and yes you can make it your self. But it is still good stuff though. Better than plain creatine and water.
-
08-23-2003, 12:36 AM #5
bigol'legs,, ya know who makes and carries this trans-x online???
-
08-23-2003, 11:58 AM #6
bump for Trans-X, I love that stuff.
Fear.com, SciTec makes it. It has 12 grams of creatine per serving, glutamine, arginine, taurine, zma, and ribose in it.
Here's a friendly tip, don't buy the Lemon.
We sell it for $29.99 for 4 lbs.
-
08-23-2003, 02:02 PM #7
very expensive, but im gonna make it myself wonder how good it will taste
-
08-25-2003, 03:20 PM #8
So this Trans-x is better than phosphagen HP? I agree on the cell-tech a friend buys it but hes out of money now. If you look on the label of cell-tech under ingredients 50% will be ADVERTISING, At least it should be because that is what you are paying for.
-
08-25-2003, 05:50 PM #9
Fruit punch is my favorite. Orange is OK. I agree dont get lemon. Ive never used phos. HP
-
08-26-2003, 06:38 AM #10Originally Posted by lloyd_cannon
-
08-26-2003, 01:12 PM #11
I know they don't compare in the field of ingredients but Im speaking of results. Is there really that much difference between the two in results. Trans-x is probably only slightly better, is it worth all the extra money?
-
08-26-2003, 04:03 PM #12
I use it to bulk and I put on 80 lbs. 8) of course I ate a lot 2 *)
-
09-25-2003, 01:04 AM #13New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- SYD, Australia
- Posts
- 31
dude u dont need that much sugar to replace glycogen stores mate!
i would shoot 4 dymatize powertech. it just landed in australia so its good shit 4 us
-
09-26-2003, 01:10 PM #14
Try vitargo cgl. It's cheaper than cell tech and works awesome.
-
09-29-2003, 04:02 AM #15
80lbs?OMG!
-
09-29-2003, 01:08 PM #16Originally Posted by steadygaining1
-
09-29-2003, 01:12 PM #17Originally Posted by mass junkie
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS