
Originally Posted by
Narkissos
Are your legs better than theirs? I'll get back to this shortly.
Quite frankly no... If biomechanically you can get into the position without your back rounding over..and without your knees straying past your toes much, you're good to go. The chance of injury is reduced drstically when those two factors are accomodated.
Guys that squat below parallel should have better quads...or at least a fuller-looking development. The 'tear-drop' section of the quads is activated by sub-parallel knee-bending. This is why the leg-extension is so good at building the tear-drop...this is why the (below-parallel) hack-squat is so good at building the tear-drop. Review the leg-extension range of motion. The knee-bending is akin to a sub-parallel squat...check it out!
Stop calling it 'half-way down'. For many people, hip-flexibility only allows parallel.
Back to the point...theorectically you could get up to 405 in a couple weeks if you change to parallel-squatting.
It will take a whole new mindset tho. The weights'll be times heavier...Gravity will be more of your enemy. Your mindsection will feel unstable etc.
I do both below-parallel and parallel squatting..in the same workout.
High-rep Below-parallel work to warm my hips/glutes/hams: to prepare me for the heavy parallel work...and to help me find the right 'groove' for the exercise
Low-rep Parallel work to pile on the poundage
I actually apply the same concept to leg-presses (which i do preceding squats)... During leg-presses: i bring my knees down to the sides of my torso on the lighter sets...to warm the hips and knees and get that gluteal stretch going on. On the heavies, i lower my knees to my chest.
I think both parallel and sub-parallel have places in your work-out
Hope this helps
~Corey