Results 1 to 39 of 39
Thread: High reps for mass?
-
06-14-2006, 08:20 AM #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 94
High reps for mass?
Currently I do 6 reps for each exercise, I have been told to increase the rep range when bulking to 10-14?
Do you find higher reps better for mass building?
-
06-14-2006, 08:27 AM #2Originally Posted by legend05
totally depends on the muscle used.but i would include a broad spectrum of rep ranges and definitley not just 6 reps
-
06-14-2006, 08:30 AM #3Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 94
That's what i had in mind, incorporating high/low reps to each body part,
-
06-14-2006, 08:42 AM #4
The bulk of my movements I keep in the 6-8 rep range, but I believe in occasionally throwing in higher rep schemes to keep your muscles guessing. And I think alot of this is also person dependant, some guys only do high rep arm training and their arms are huge, other guys only do 6-8 reps arm training. Some guys have naturally good sweep in their quads and they can do high leg reps 15-20/set year round and hold their size. What I've done is customized my training to work for my body.
-
06-14-2006, 12:49 PM #5Associate Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 413
Higher reps for mass building?
Not really no... lower reps would be better, you can mix some in if you want though
-
06-14-2006, 01:12 PM #6Originally Posted by helium3
Works for me
-
06-14-2006, 01:28 PM #7Associate Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 413
Stay at 6 reps and take 90 second rests between sets if you want size, if you want strength take longer rests
I wouldn't try high reps for size
-
06-14-2006, 01:41 PM #8
to b honest i don't put much thought into # of reps at all. as long as your doing quality reps, and completely exhausting ur muscles thn thts fine. Personally i think bulking or cutting has more to do with wht ur feeding ur muscles w/, thn how many reps you do. but i agree w/ some of the others tht you should switch it up, just because shocking ur muscles is a great way to encourage growth.
-
06-14-2006, 02:09 PM #9Originally Posted by Elexecution
I agree.
I've gotten great results from the MAX-OT approach.
-
06-14-2006, 02:14 PM #10Originally Posted by Andorious
Agreed
-
06-14-2006, 02:51 PM #11Originally Posted by Andorious
-
06-14-2006, 03:59 PM #12Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 139
higer reps are for mucle endurance but not size , size and gains come from low reps ranging between 6-10 if less than 6 u will build strength but not size
-
06-14-2006, 11:16 PM #13Associate Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 413
Originally Posted by little_soldier
-
06-14-2006, 11:48 PM #14AR Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 25,737
I do 10-12 reps for all bodyparts except legs in which I do 15-20.
Just find what works best for you.
~SC~
-
06-14-2006, 11:53 PM #15
i also do about 10-15
the last few reps are the ones that count the most...the intensity you put behind them
-
06-15-2006, 12:30 AM #16Originally Posted by legend05
-
06-15-2006, 12:31 AM #17
though the most popular suggested rep range for mass building is typically between 6-10 reps, it all depends on your genentic predisposition. like others said, have to see what works for you. however, doing the same amount of reps over and over will eventually make you stale and your gains will slow or even stop without varying things up a bit.
what i do right now is start with a fairly light weight where i can do 14-16 reps. then, i add a decent amount of weight where i can get out about 6-10. if i'm doing 3 sets, then i go to an even heavier weight on my last set for about 4-6 reps.
a widely varying rep range such as this triggers both sarcoplasmic hypertrophy and myofibrillar hypertrophy, ensuring gains from both aspects of muscle growth.
-
06-15-2006, 12:37 AM #18
The one common thing I have read around here the most is "find out what works for you."
I guess I am inclined to agree on that at least. But, there are stickies in this forum and others that discuss bulking and cutting styles of lifting. I am bulking right now myself and am trying to follow the heavy weight low rep routine. I've been hearing this for years tho, even b4 I came here....
Higher reps, lower weight, less time= cutting
Lower reps, higher weight, more time= bulking
*personally, I don't follow the more time rule, I do some warm ups slap that weight to where I can't pull more than 7 reps.......
-
06-15-2006, 12:43 AM #19Originally Posted by ascendant
The guy said he worked out with people along the lines of Arnie.....(who knows how true that is, but he had the 70's orange-skin tan, and the hair implants on his head, so maybe....LOL)
ANYWAY, he told me this same thing. To start out with low weight on the first set and increase the weight with each following set.......3 to 4 sets.......
I've done this and it worked.
I agree with what someone else said on this thread too, about changing your routine around in order to keep the muscles guessing. I am going to follow the stickies for my bulking and cutting cycles to see how they work, then I'll probably go back to this style for a minute
-
06-15-2006, 12:44 AM #20Originally Posted by ascendant
-
06-15-2006, 12:47 AM #21
Riddle me this.....people talk about going to "muscle fatigue" or "muscle failure" I can, and have done this. BUT, when I do, my sets are cut more than in half........QUESTION.....IS THAT OK? To only do like 3 to 6 sets TOTAL on one muscle group if you are working to "muscle failure?"
-
06-15-2006, 05:37 AM #22Associate Member
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 414
it depends on the bodypart... sometimes i'll do a 20 rep squat... but would I ever do a 20 rep bench press??? NO!
-
06-15-2006, 06:22 AM #23
It depends on what your goals are, what your training experience is, the muscle group and more importantly the exercises used. I would personally not use low rep schemes (0-5) for single joint movements such as bicep curls, calf raises, shrugs and most shoulder movements (I know they multi-joint)
-
06-15-2006, 09:56 AM #24Originally Posted by Slowhand
My question is if you work any body part to muscle failure, how many sets do people consider is enough........Anybody???
-
06-15-2006, 10:04 AM #25
i count the amount of stress that i am trying to accomplish on the body part..
heavy weight = low reps static training
lighter weight = high reps
vary these two routines every 6 weeks or so to keep the body working.. i have done the 15-20 reps like swole stated but i mostly do that as a finish, seems to be working but really makes recovery longer..The answer to your every question
Rules
A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted
to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially
one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.
If you get scammed by an UGL listed on this board or by another member here, it's all part of the game and learning experience for you,
we do not approve nor support any sources that may be listed on this site.
I will not do source checks for you, the peer review from other members should be enough to help you make a decision on your quest. Buyer beware.
Don't Let the Police kick your ass
-
06-15-2006, 05:31 PM #26Originally Posted by stayinstacked
squats for instance might not be the safest exercise to really really push yourself with heavy weight. but you do a heavy set first, than finish up with a 20 repper, and this allows you to really annihilate yourself safely
on top of i think they are great
-
06-15-2006, 06:49 PM #27Originally Posted by Andorious
Last edited by gr8gear; 06-15-2006 at 06:53 PM.
-
06-16-2006, 02:29 AM #28Originally Posted by spywizard
Like let's say on bench, I'll do 5 sets, somewhat quickly ( 1 minute - 1:30 between each). My first set is my warmup and its light, like half my whole load. I'll pump out 15- 17. My next 3 sets are at a weight that I can't push for more than 7. The 4th is done within 15 seconds and it goes back down to my warmup weight and I do burnout set.
I pretty much do this on all my muscle groups.......I am beginning to think I need to treat them differently. After reading swole's sticky on arms, I am going to try that out next time.....
RIDDLE ME THIS.....WHAT IS YOUR RECOVERY TIME after you work a certain muscle group?
THANKS FOR THE ADVISE....I'll keep the switch every 6 weeks and give it a shot.....
-
06-16-2006, 02:36 AM #29Originally Posted by gr8gear
I'm going on my second week of a bulking AAS cycle, so I think I am going to stick with the low rep/high weight, because that is where I started. I have to agree with you tho about the inevitability of cheating......It's almost impossible to not cheat. It's hard to keep slow, concentrated movements on high weight.
ONLY on my legs do I not have much of a problem with this.
AS A MATTER OF FACT, for me, I have seen great improvements in strength and definition in my legs from this style. When I begin my cutting cycle, I am going to go with the low weight, higher rep routine tho and I do get a much bigger burn from that style.......
-
06-20-2006, 09:47 AM #30New Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Location
- Miami
- Posts
- 31
don't only look at your reps for increasing hypertrophy, rest time between sets are very important as well. Don't rest more than 60s between sets and try and maintain a 10-12RM. Volume is key to hypertrophy...
-
06-20-2006, 09:59 AM #31Originally Posted by x305x
-
06-20-2006, 10:00 AM #32
personally i think that your diet will dictate whether you are going to put on mass or not. Your going to need to lean bulk to put the mass on. The rep range like swole said is whatever works best for you. Your diet is the most important factor here. if your calorie deficient or arent getting enough protein you cant expect to put mass on. i have modified my workout over time and ive found that a rep range of 8-12 is optimal for me. On some exercises i do go as low as 4 reps but that is exercise specific to get that burn. For instance i find that with incline DB's i need my last set to be higher in weight and get 4-5 assisted reps out to really shock my chest.
-
06-20-2006, 11:09 AM #33Originally Posted by SwoleCat
Totally agree, I find 8-12 puts on quality muscle size. For legs I prefer 12-15. Nonetheless he is totally right you have to explore and find out what works out best for you.
-
06-20-2006, 01:57 PM #34
i try to avoid getting numbers stuck in my head and just execute the movement with the best form that I can for as many reps as I can, anywhere from 5-10 reps
-
06-23-2006, 06:28 PM #35
In my humble opinion, I believe the heavier the weight is - the harder it gets to have perfect form!!!!
If you lose the form, not only do you lose the benefit of the exercise but risk yourself for an injury.
-
08-23-2006, 07:31 AM #36Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 215
Originally Posted by Elexecution
I have been using Starting Strength since May and am very happy with results. This program utilizes a 5-rep scheme.
I plan i using this program for awhile. Until I am happy with all my poundage for my core lifts. My goals are at least 300 or more on all core lifts.Last edited by Kristofer68ss; 08-23-2006 at 05:19 PM.
-
08-23-2006, 10:37 AM #37
10-8-8-6
-
08-26-2006, 01:22 AM #38AR's Midget Beater
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Location
- in your girls panties
- Posts
- 6,526
My scheme right now is 15-15-12-12-25
Strange, but hey it's ****ing gravy.
-
08-28-2006, 08:48 PM #39New Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 21
I think the most important thing for B.B. purposes is that you squeeze the muscle you are traing . You need to make the muscle fail with good clean reps that train the muscle you are trying to train, when you go to heavy , you lose the ability to control and squeez the muscle , I am a firm believer that you should mix it up. Again for B.B. purposes I believe 8-12 rep range is the best but I dont think its the main focus. Just remember always push yourself , weather its shorter rest periods between sets or more weight , or drop sets or negitives, You've got to make the muscle grow because the body would rather stay the same. So bust ass.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS