-
08-08-2006, 10:49 AM #1
quick pro quo....iso or both....?
machines that can be used isolateral wise.....
will they work ur areas better then using both ways at same time???
i ponder this alot...
i will iso it up for the back machines
but not for chest....difference???
-
08-08-2006, 05:50 PM #2
......bastards.....
-
08-08-2006, 08:57 PM #3Originally Posted by boxingbean
anytime you can isolate a muscle group, is good you are souly focused just on that muscle group and that muscle alone, i assume you are talking about Hammer Stregth equipment ? i love hammer stregth's back equipment that stuff really help isolation
-
08-09-2006, 01:32 AM #4Originally Posted by steve0
yup....love em for the back!
-
08-09-2006, 02:22 AM #5
Well, hard to tell i do both. but in general i try to isolate my muscles most of the time .. in the end i wanna train a caertain muscle and not the whole body.
Moreover "the big 3" compound movements are not that benefical i feel. Heavy squats and rows tend to broaden your waist and hips and flat bench hurts your shoulders in the long run.. I do variations of these which are far better IMO..
-
08-09-2006, 09:15 AM #6Originally Posted by AleX-69
i agree....benching does mess my shoulder joints up, so ill switch it up with dumbells...
squatting is not for me...well it is., but i mean free weights, my knees get tight so i have to use a machine
-
08-09-2006, 09:45 AM #7
you need both,
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Blast cycle thoughts
Yesterday, 02:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS