Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    y100adics's Avatar
    y100adics is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    310

    Burns more calories

    What burns more calories??????

    An hour on the eliptical at a very high speed .... as fast as u can go to keep pace for an hour.... or

    An hour on the eliptical at a high resistance level

    Thanks for comments!

  2. #2
    ckgators is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    9
    Staggered resistance and/or Run/Jog...alternating has great results for burning fat and "primo" cardio training.

  3. #3
    t-gunz's Avatar
    t-gunz is offline MONITOR~ ~ RIP ~ Gone never Forgotten
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    sydney, australia
    Posts
    3,512
    ^^^^ agreed it is more intense

  4. #4
    perfectbeast2001's Avatar
    perfectbeast2001 is offline "king of free stuff" / Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    7,979
    I wouldn't worry about how many cals you have burned, worry about the right intensity to burn fat not muscle.
    220 - age x .7 =

  5. #5
    Tru2's Avatar
    Tru2 is offline Female Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    197
    how about 30 mins on the treadmill doing sprint intervals.

  6. #6
    Springbok_Powered's Avatar
    Springbok_Powered is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    47
    Agree completely, intensity is far more important. I would try to find a good balance between high resistance at a decent speed.

  7. #7
    Payton is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Toronto, ON, Canada-eh
    Posts
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by perfectbeast2001
    I wouldn't worry about how many cals you have burned, worry about the right intensity to burn fat not muscle.
    220 - age x .7 =
    Did you mean (220-age) x .7 ? This way f I am 27 I will have to stay in 135 range.
    If it's 220 - age x .7 my HR should be 201

  8. #8
    t-gunz's Avatar
    t-gunz is offline MONITOR~ ~ RIP ~ Gone never Forgotten
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    sydney, australia
    Posts
    3,512
    yeah the one with the brackets lol..... 135 is right

  9. #9
    JohnboyF is offline Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    3,948
    Cals burned is not the answer, its burning fat from the fat stores.

  10. #10
    MFT81's Avatar
    MFT81 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    On Steroid.com
    Posts
    1,683
    Quote Originally Posted by y100adics
    What burns more calories??????

    An hour on the eliptical at a very high speed .... as fast as u can go to keep pace for an hour.... or

    An hour on the eliptical at a high resistance level

    Thanks for comments!

    Setting the resistance level at a high rate would be borderline anarobic which uses glucose as a primary fuel source, Meaning that although you might have burned up more calories overall you could of burned fat more effeciently by following the 220-age*.7 (Or just 170 minus age too)

    IMO, you should do intervals and if you want kick up the resistance on high for a change of pace periodically, your body gets used to cardio just like weight training and should change things up a bit as well too.

  11. #11
    S.P.G's Avatar
    S.P.G is offline AR Workout Scientist
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    uk/ south east
    Posts
    4,535
    Quote Originally Posted by FaizakaFez
    Cals burned is not the answer, its burning fat from the fat stores.
    agreed.......

  12. #12
    IBdmfkr's Avatar
    IBdmfkr is offline AR VET
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,326
    Quote Originally Posted by FaizakaFez
    Cals burned is not the answer, its burning fat from the fat stores.
    Exactly, if you want to burn more calories.. just have more self control and don't consume them in the first place..

  13. #13
    y100adics's Avatar
    y100adics is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    310
    In my defense of this thread .. it was started originally on jan 4 ... and I've learned calories burned doesn't mean anything

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •