Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    mowla's Avatar
    mowla is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    74

    optimum heart rate

    you know this "220-agex0.7= ohr" .does the same calculation apply to women or is there a diferent calculation to use?

  2. #2
    skank's Avatar
    skank is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    601
    No difference for men or women. Same calculation. But just remember the 220-age is just a very rough estimate of max heartrate. Everybody is different.

  3. #3
    mowla's Avatar
    mowla is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    74
    how do you get a more exact optimum heart rate if this calculation is a rough guide

  4. #4
    skank's Avatar
    skank is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    601
    The only way I could tell is through the events I used to do when wearing a heartrate moniter. I would hit my max heart rate at the end of a 5k or 10k run. The only time I seem to reach the max is during a competition of something sustained. In training , even during intervals, I just cannot get above 90%.

  5. #5
    AandF6969's Avatar
    AandF6969 is offline Made Up Of Wires
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    5,383
    Quote Originally Posted by skank
    No difference for men or women. Same calculation. But just remember the 220-age is just a very rough estimate of max heartrate. Everybody is different.
    Actually the MHR value for women is 226, not 220. Not a huge difference but on the books it's there.

  6. #6
    skank's Avatar
    skank is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    601
    Quote Originally Posted by AandF6969
    Actually the MHR value for women is 226, not 220. Not a huge difference but on the books it's there.
    Thanks, thats the first I heard of it.

  7. #7
    max2extreme's Avatar
    max2extreme is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    0
    Like Skank said, when using equations to estimate things like MHR and such, you have to remember the number you get is an estimate with deviations. Example, the MHR standard deviation is + or - 15bpm. So if you have a 50 year old man for example, 220-50 = 170 meaning his MHR is anywhere between 155-185... THats a pretty big range! HRs should be used to guide intensity because of its direct relationship with oxygen consumption. So dont think that if you do the equation for OHR and you get 185bpm, that 185bpm is the absolute best hr for you. Experiment a little and take note of your body is the best way. It may take some work and time and attention to detail, but then you'll know better how your body works and how to manipulate it the most efficiently.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •