Results 1 to 15 of 15
-
03-14-2003, 04:38 PM #1Associate Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Detroit, MI
- Posts
- 246
Riding a Bike compared to Running
I was wondering how is riding a bicycle compare to running when trying to lose weight? I was told I needed to ride like 5 miles for every one mile I run. Running is just too hard on my knees now. Please give comparisons on this theory. Oh yeah, mainly trying to slim up the ol' stomach for summer. I do ab workout daily in combination with cardio.
-
03-14-2003, 04:47 PM #2Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Location
- fairfax va
- Posts
- 131
any cardio is good but running is more intense, therefore you can burn more calories in a shorter amount of time, although some of these calories might be muscle and less fat, the lower your intensity (heartrate) the more likely you will be burning fat instead of muscle. this is why you notice the really big dudes just walking or riding at amedium pace. if you just wanna lose weight go for the treadmill but if you wanna spare muscle go for the bike, this is just my opinion though
-
03-14-2003, 07:44 PM #3Associate Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Detroit, MI
- Posts
- 246
How about a time frame. What is a good time limit to ride and or distance. Assuming it is done 5 days a week.
-
03-14-2003, 08:00 PM #4
I would say the usual 30 - 45 mins at 65% your MHR. It is really a function of your heart rate and not what you are doing. I always switch up my cardio as I find I get used to it just like the same lifting workout and it loses its effectiveness.
Pain
-
03-14-2003, 08:47 PM #5Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Location
- Northern VA
- Posts
- 594
IMO, biking is the smith machine version of running...
-
03-14-2003, 08:49 PM #6Originally posted by yellows2k
IMO, biking is the smith machine version of running...
Pain
-
03-15-2003, 12:07 AM #7
I guess that depends on if you mean running outside vs biking outside. I'd say that you'd have to go about 5 times as far on the bike but you're also going about 5 times as fast.
I think biking outside is great, asuming you're going to put some intensity in it (as much as you would if you were running).
If you mean riding the bike inside then I'd have to say that you're wasting your time. IMO the stationary bike is worthless. If you're inside and don't want to run on a treadmill try one of the steppers.
-
03-15-2003, 07:33 AM #8Junior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 109
i've got the same problem with my knees and running! What's everyones opinion on elliptical trainers? i personally find it easier on joints than the treadmill and better/tougher than the bike
-
03-15-2003, 07:48 AM #9
The eilliptical gets me pouring sweat. I've found though that I've had better results walking on a treadmill with a 10% incline.
The treadmill is nice and easy on the joints and a pretty damn good cardio workout when walking on an incline.
-
03-15-2003, 09:27 AM #10
The eilliptical and incline are my main fallbacks. All other forms, are just for variety. I always feel a little "fruity" when I am on the eilliptical though.
Pain
-
03-15-2003, 10:29 AM #11Originally posted by painintheazz
The eilliptical and incline are my main fallbacks. All other forms, are just for variety. I always feel a little "fruity" when I am on the eilliptical though.
Pain
-
03-15-2003, 01:44 PM #12
Yup, running took a toll on my joints when I started cutting from 250ish down to 205lb. Now I just can't run for more than 2 times a week or I get really achy. Anyway running gets my HR too high.
Pain
-
04-05-2003, 02:18 AM #13Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2003
- Location
- The Gym-aka my garage :-)
- Posts
- 790
They say it doesn't matter what you do, as long as your heart rate is in the "zone".
For myself, I sweat the most on an exercise bike and treadmill. I have to work really hard most of the time to get my heart rate high on the bike. I like to run alot, and find that when I am below 190 pounds, my joints don't hurt.
I also use the elipticals. I always split my cardio sessions in half, 15 - 20 on one, and 15 - 20 on another. It is the only way I can make it through my workout.
Now when I am taking eca and hit the treadmill, look out.
Also, I can't stand ding cardio at 65%. I like to get my heart rate at high 150's to low 160's. I just feel so much better after a workout if it is high intensity.
-
04-05-2003, 05:18 AM #14
I used to go in the 150-160 range and I liked it better too, but I noticed lots of muscle loss. I have noticed about the same fat lose in the 130 range for me with no muscle loss. I would watch out for that.
Pain
-
04-05-2003, 08:02 AM #15
I have always done high intensity cardio as well. I always heard that it was low intensity/long duration cardio that burned muscle. I always got the example of a sprinters physique vs. a distance runners physique.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS