Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Comments on this Full Body Scan Results (screen shot posted)

  1. #1

    Comments on this Full Body Scan Results (screen shot posted)

    Hi all,

    Did this full body scan the other day which tells me BF%, Muscle Mass etc. I've attached it.

    It's basically telling me I'm at 19.6% BF (circled it on the screen shot), however I feel like I'm much leaner than this.

    Please also note the red out line is muscle and yellow is fat.

    The thing is, this stupid scan doesn't appear to take height into consideration. It's just a percentage based on fat to total weight ratio.
    My question is - To get an accurate BF% reading you would have to factor in someones height right? What if I was like 8 foot with the same amount of fat, I'd look heaps skinny yet this thing would still tell me I'm at 19%...?

    Any comments, when can I just start bulking again, I'm sick of this diet and leaning and getting smaller and losing strength

    Thanks.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	BodyScan 19.03.2013.jpg 
Views:	144 
Size:	105.4 KB 
ID:	136393  

  2. #2
    Oh and its also telling me:

    • Total body bone mineral density: 1.199 g.cm-2 (normal)
    • Total percent body fat: 19.6 % (recommended limits1 8% – 20%)
    • Central abdominal fat (sub-region R1): 0.473 kg – Low risk2
    • Resting Metabolic Rate: 2141 kcal/day
    • In reviewing your current body composition your ideal weight is between 88.0 kg to 89.9 kg
    • To achieve this you need to lose 2.9 kg to 4.8 kg of fat
    Suggested calorie intake to attain ideal weight based on RMR
    165 (P) 220 (C) 73 (F) 2200 (Calories/Day)

    I don't think this Macro is a good idea either, carbs looks way to high?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •