Was wondering what the difference in the muscle building capabilities of different AAS chemicals are. For example, how may the results vary if a person were to run Prop/Tren cycle as oppsed to a Prop/Nandro Phenylprop cycle, or a Prop/Deca cycle, Prop/Deca/Drol cyle etc. I would suppose this is going to be a hard question to answer as I believe that each persons body is unique in that not all chemicals will affect each individual the same. I am just trying to figure out how to the most bang for the buck. To me I would think that a Tren/Prop/Drol cycle would probably pack on the most mass, but if this were true for everyone, why would anyone want to use anything else? (With the exception of IGF and GH) I guess what I am asking is, with the availiabilty of so many different types of AAS chemicals, would a person eventually just have to experiment with everything to see what works the best for them?