Body Evolution After 3 Cycles (DEXAs)

[BJJ]

BEFORE 1ST CYCLE



AFTER 2 CYCLES



AFTER 3 CYCLES




BONY TISSUE GROWTH (g): 157.1 (+4,81%)
FAT DECREASE (g): 1223.5 (-11,14%)
LEAN MASS INCREASE (g): 16041.7 (+18,73)

[The Wolfman]

So:

Before first: 85.6kg and 12.7% bodyfat?
After three cycles: 101.6 and 9.6% bodyfat?

Is that right?
Holy shit

[BJJ]

Yes, that is correct.

[The Wolfman]

Amazing!

[Antonioj]

Very impressive and informative!

[cyounger100]

wow so 3 percent difference thats great

[BJJ]

Anyone experienced or knows available data to validate my results on bony tissue? I expected a bit more of weight.
Swifto?

[Swifto]

I think MS is your man here mate.

[BJJ]

OK thanks

[CMB]

I want to see pictures.

[MuscleScience]

I think MS is your man here mate.

You know it...LOL

Anyone experienced or knows available data to validate my results on bony tissue? I expected a bit more of weight.
Swifto?

SO the question is, is it right that your bone density increased after three cycles?

That to me looks right, granted most bone density increases I have seen with DEXA scans are on older adults. Mostly with the combination of weight bearing exercise and hormone replacement therapy. However AAS, is used in extreme cases of bone mineral lose to help facilitate re-sedimentation of minerals to the bone. Typically we are talking about phosphorus and calcium in carbonated hydroxyapatite, and lesser bone salts as well.

[BJJ]

SO the question is, is it right that your bone density increased after three cycles?

That to me looks right, granted most bone density increases I have seen with DEXA scans are on older adults. Mostly with the combination of weight bearing exercise and hormone replacement therapy. However AAS, is used in extreme cases of bone mineral lose to help facilitate re-sedimentation of minerals to the bone. Typically we are talking about phosphorus and calcium in carbonated hydroxyapatite, and lesser bone salts as well.

Well, first thank you for your response.

Basically, it is normal to have an increase in bone density after a cycle of AAS, this is clear to me.
What is not clear is the double result I got from either the lumbar spinal and the hip DEXAs, which indicated a normal range bone density.
I expected, as I improved my muscular quality and strength, to have improved also my bony tissue density, hence strength.
Any comments on that "dyscrasia"?

[BJJ]

I want to see pictures.

Someday you will.

[BJJ]

Bump for MS

[MuscleScience]

Bump for MS

I dont really understand your question, but I will take a stab at it.

The Lumbar and Hip densities are within normal range. Bone mineral densities are also determined by your genetic make up. Some people have denser bones than others even if they are more physically active. I wouldnt worry to much about those results, in fact I would be happy with them.

[BJJ]

I dont really understand your question, but I will take a stab at it.

The Lumbar and Hip densities are within normal range. Bone mineral densities are also determined by your genetic make up. Some people have denser bones than others even if they are more physically active. I wouldnt worry to much about those results, in fact I would be happy with them.

Much respect and thanks for your reply.
I apologize for my English!