Optimal Ranges

Attachment 118432

There are a lot of Physicians who practice restorative (TRT/AA) medicine and have their own blood reference ranges for what they believe to be "optimal" for excellent health. Dr. Duzgan, a world renowned medical restorative practitioner wrote an excellent book recently called "Your Blood Doesn't Lie" which I highly recommend as it's a great read and where you can learn.

Dr. Dzugan published what he believes to be some of the most important optimal blood ranges when compared to the standard ranges we find on labs today.

In the attachment Duzgan compares some of the key panels important to us side by side for you.

You may want to save this for future reference.

Thanks for the reference. The cholesterol looks a little higher than I usually see and the estrogen (men), a little lower...

thanks for the post GD, i guess i was wrong regarding e2, i thought you can't have your e2 at 0, but the scale shows 0-53! what am i missing here?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bass

thanks for the post GD, i guess i was wrong regarding e2, i thought you can't have your e2 at 0, but the scale shows 0-53! what am i missing here?

---

Who knows bass; guess they want to measure E2 in dead men LOL!

Nice reference table for everything except (IMO) test/E2

E2 should never be 0, and it might have been a little better to bump the optimal range up to 30 or so.

Guys often forget that with E2 less is not always better. Some is needed for bone repla***ent.

Total T at 827 is a little funny, number-wise. Maybe 900?

What about el supremo: Free Test??

Would be great to have a "Master Table" of reference values to post as a sticky (of course realizing that each lab's reference range may be method-specific)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bass

thanks for the post GD, i guess i was wrong regarding e2, i thought you can't have your e2 at 0, but the scale shows 0-53! what am i missing here?

---

having that 0 in there just shows how invalid and meaningless yet another graph/range is

my guess would be that their optimal ranges would be different if they could even display a number higher than the reference range, not implying more is better, but pretty sure that is how they come up with the top number.

Seems chaps feel better at 600-800 than top of the range 1100. Guess the body is more balanced at the mid upper level. Just a guess though.